Does anyone know a simple way to convert mpg (either imperial or US gallons, but say which) to L/100km? I'd love to know what y'all are talking about.
2008 Mazda CX-7 FWDAround town, last fill was 14.8 L/100Km or 19 mpgMostly highway run, 11.2 L/100 Km or 25 mpgThese are with an engine that has not been broken in yet as I only have 1,400 km on the vehicle.
Quote from: Wolverine on April 28, 2008, 11:27:46 pmOk, so I've got a nice one here.Polo 1.6L Flex Fuel Engine.Using only gasoline it averages: 12L/100km~11L/100km (100% city driving with some bad traffic on the way back home, 6 km two way commute and some short trips along the day). Only tested it once on the highway, car fully loaded with 5 people and trunk full of stuff, 7.5L/100km.Now the best part:Using only ethanol: 18L/100km~16L/100km (same commute as with gasoline), never tested with ethanol on the road tho, too low autonomy.Of course I've reached heaven doing 9L/100km with 100% gasoline, 100% city driving during one full tank right after an oil and filters change. But I've touched hell as well, doing 13L/100km with 100% gasoline and on 100% city driving. This car is really weird, each tank is a surprise. Ps. The company pays the gas so any mileage is ok to me, heeheheheeheh. No offense intended, but do you have a lead foot?
Ok, so I've got a nice one here.Polo 1.6L Flex Fuel Engine.Using only gasoline it averages: 12L/100km~11L/100km (100% city driving with some bad traffic on the way back home, 6 km two way commute and some short trips along the day). Only tested it once on the highway, car fully loaded with 5 people and trunk full of stuff, 7.5L/100km.Now the best part:Using only ethanol: 18L/100km~16L/100km (same commute as with gasoline), never tested with ethanol on the road tho, too low autonomy.Of course I've reached heaven doing 9L/100km with 100% gasoline, 100% city driving during one full tank right after an oil and filters change. But I've touched hell as well, doing 13L/100km with 100% gasoline and on 100% city driving. This car is really weird, each tank is a surprise. Ps. The company pays the gas so any mileage is ok to me, heeheheheeheh.
Quote from: mmret on April 28, 2008, 11:43:01 pm No offense intended, but do you have a lead foot? Remember that ethanol has less energy per gallon than petrol; 9L/100km with ethanol is not nearly as bad as 9L/100km with gas. This is also why fuel economy drops when you use E85.
No offense intended, but do you have a lead foot?
John's reports on his new '09 Corolla got me thinking about how useful real-world fuel consumption reports are. So here's mine for my '06 Mazda3 GS (sedan, 2.0L engine, manual).With the snow gone I am averaging about 8.5-9.0L/100km in all-city driving (the longest highway stint is only a couple of exits).Today I took a drive down to Ogdensburg, New York. I averaged 7.2L/100km on the way there with the cruise set at 105 km/h. On the way back I got 6.2L/100km with the cruise set at 100 km/h (this is all according to the on-board fuel consumption computer which has proven generally accurate). I must say that I'm very surprised at seeing such a big difference for such a small change in the speed.
Less than 4,000 kms in the car.Averaging 9.4 L/100 kms in pure city driving, with hitting VTEC a # of times per fill-up.Mazda3 (2.3 litre) in the same conditions averaged 8.4 L/100 kms, and took regular gas.
Quote from: dorin on April 28, 2008, 10:01:11 pmJohn's reports on his new '09 Corolla got me thinking about how useful real-world fuel consumption reports are. So here's mine for my '06 Mazda3 GS (sedan, 2.0L engine, manual).With the snow gone I am averaging about 8.5-9.0L/100km in all-city driving (the longest highway stint is only a couple of exits).Today I took a drive down to Ogdensburg, New York. I averaged 7.2L/100km on the way there with the cruise set at 105 km/h. On the way back I got 6.2L/100km with the cruise set at 100 km/h (this is all according to the on-board fuel consumption computer which has proven generally accurate). I must say that I'm very surprised at seeing such a big difference for such a small change in the speed.did you fill up your tank in NY? it might be your answer, quality of fuel has impact on it's economy.
I'm still a little puzzled as to why a 5 km/h speed difference would translate into a 1L/100km difference in the fuel consumption.
Quote from: Arctic_White on April 29, 2008, 08:33:54 pmLess than 4,000 kms in the car.Averaging 9.4 L/100 kms in pure city driving, with hitting VTEC a # of times per fill-up.Mazda3 (2.3 litre) in the same conditions averaged 8.4 L/100 kms, and took regular gas.My civic si just got 600km for 45 litres (7.5L/100km) on a hwy/city/vtec mix. But yes, even though just 45 litres, that was a $1.41/L 91-octane fillup.
Dodge Dakota Quad Cab 4.7 AWD. Rush hour commuting, full city, max speed 60 km/h.. Lots of red lights etc. 19L/100km.