Author Topic: 2022 F-150 Lightning  (Read 67671 times)

Offline Great_Big_Abyss

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13744
  • Carma: +267/-457
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 Mazda CX-5
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #660 on: April 26, 2024, 08:41:01 am »
^^^  You're so smart.  We all wish we could be just like you.  We bow down to you, O Superior One. 

Offline BWII

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6156
  • Carma: +188/-375
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #661 on: April 26, 2024, 09:37:45 am »


Seems like a better idea for a new build.

I believe they are mandatory here in MB on new builds.  When my kid looked at a new build it had it, realty guy said it had to. 

If you want to save some real money, get a new high efficiency gas furnace vs a 20 (or more) year old gas furnace.  Now THAT there is some real savings that pays itself off quick.  IIR it was less than 3 yrs in how much our heating bill dropped that the new furnace was paid for, I was shocked. Unless you live in a city where a furnace install is more than double what mine was (yay for small towns again!  ;D).  Then the ROI is a bit longer. Still worth it.  Friend replaced his e-furnace with gas a few years back...couldn't believe how much cheaper it was than the electric.  And 'nicer' heat, too.

Offline blur911

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13625
  • Carma: +242/-779
  • Nasty Weasel
    • View Profile
  • Cars: and bikes by age:BMW, Porsche, Subaru, Suzuki, Suzuki, Mazda, Jaguar, Kawasaki, Porsche, GMC, Suzuki
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #662 on: April 26, 2024, 09:51:48 am »
You have to have a water tank heater to make that work, don't you?

Nope.  Drain water recovery is a system whereby it pre-heats the water being fed into the hot water heater, tankless or tank, doesn't matter.
We have a tankless water heater in fact.

Example : as we shower, the hot water that would normally just be wasted down the drain goes through a heat exchange which transfers 47% of that waste heat to incoming cold water input to the water heater.   Effectively, your water heating requirements are dropped in half for showers.   We only put the system on shower drains because those are the majority of our hot water use.  Again, due to good planning during the reno we ensured we separated the drains to ensure we caught only hot water through the system.

Due to 4 adults in the house, our payback is two years, see article, and our system looks identical to the picture.
https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/toronto-passive-some-thoughts-on-drainwater-heat-recovery



Interesting concept. Can't see it working on a two story very well as you need to wrap the drain near the shower drain. My master toilet, sinks, shower and tub all drain on one side for about 10' and then come together in one common drain. On the other side of the house the other two bathrooms  etc tie together in another drain system (Open house concept with no drain runs in middle of house. The cold line would need to run up two stories and then back down two stories to the water heater cold intake. That's a lot of extra line but the concept is solid.
Ya, I was looking at my stuff just now.

Seems like a better idea for a new build.

And with only 2 of us? Not sure it's worth it.

AFAIK, this is code for new houses in Ontario.  Builders hate it because depending on the house and septic, it can be near impossible to install and have work. (think septic line that goes out the basement 7 feet up a wall)   
Mr Pickypants

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15752
  • Carma: +117/-436
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #663 on: April 26, 2024, 10:02:04 am »


Seems like a better idea for a new build.

I believe they are mandatory here in MB on new builds.  When my kid looked at a new build it had it, realty guy said it had to. 

If you want to save some real money, get a new high efficiency gas furnace vs a 20 (or more) year old gas furnace.  Now THAT there is some real savings that pays itself off quick.  IIR it was less than 3 yrs in how much our heating bill dropped that the new furnace was paid for, I was shocked. Unless you live in a city where a furnace install is more than double what mine was (yay for small towns again!  ;D).  Then the ROI is a bit longer. Still worth it.  Friend replaced his e-furnace with gas a few years back...couldn't believe how much cheaper it was than the electric.  And 'nicer' heat, too.

Interesting. I have looked at the ROI of "upgrading" from mid efficiency to high efficiency many times and the numbers just don't work. Throw in the fact that high efficiency units are much more finicky requiring services, calibrations and cleanings more often and the return is just not there. Current natural gas pricing sitting at historic lows is not helping the case at all. The last time a fitter was in my place servicing my AC he said to hold onto my mids as long as I possibly can. I would save about $50/month so $600/year. New HE units for my place are about $12k. So 20 years with no time value of money calculation. Not at this time.  ;D




Offline blur911

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13625
  • Carma: +242/-779
  • Nasty Weasel
    • View Profile
  • Cars: and bikes by age:BMW, Porsche, Subaru, Suzuki, Suzuki, Mazda, Jaguar, Kawasaki, Porsche, GMC, Suzuki
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #664 on: April 26, 2024, 10:26:31 am »


Seems like a better idea for a new build.

I believe they are mandatory here in MB on new builds.  When my kid looked at a new build it had it, realty guy said it had to. 

If you want to save some real money, get a new high efficiency gas furnace vs a 20 (or more) year old gas furnace.  Now THAT there is some real savings that pays itself off quick.  IIR it was less than 3 yrs in how much our heating bill dropped that the new furnace was paid for, I was shocked. Unless you live in a city where a furnace install is more than double what mine was (yay for small towns again!  ;D).  Then the ROI is a bit longer. Still worth it.  Friend replaced his e-furnace with gas a few years back...couldn't believe how much cheaper it was than the electric.  And 'nicer' heat, too.

Interesting. I have looked at the ROI of "upgrading" from mid efficiency to high efficiency many times and the numbers just don't work. Throw in the fact that high efficiency units are much more finicky requiring services, calibrations and cleanings more often and the return is just not there. Current natural gas pricing sitting at historic lows is not helping the case at all. The last time a fitter was in my place servicing my AC he said to hold onto my mids as long as I possibly can. I would save about $50/month so $600/year. New HE units for my place are about $12k. So 20 years with no time value of money calculation. Not at this time.  ;D

New furnaces also only last about 10 years, they weren't selling enough when they lasted 20

Offline Guy

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7810
  • Carma: +478/-1157
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Mustang Mach-E Premium, 2019 Volvo XC40 Momentum
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #665 on: April 26, 2024, 01:26:46 pm »
My water heater electricity cost is .50$ per day. Certainly not worth investing to improve efficiency.

Offline WP v3.32

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Carma: +8/-18
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: bugatti
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #666 on: April 26, 2024, 05:00:47 pm »
I just use the neighbor's garden hose when he's not looking for my monthly shower. Cost me 0$

Offline Guy

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7810
  • Carma: +478/-1157
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Mustang Mach-E Premium, 2019 Volvo XC40 Momentum
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #667 on: April 26, 2024, 05:49:57 pm »
I just use the neighbor's garden hose when he's not looking for my monthly shower. Cost me 0$

 :rofl: :rofl:

Offline tortoise

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14963
  • Carma: +235/-453
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #668 on: April 26, 2024, 06:15:38 pm »
So much for putting a price on dignity
Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.

Offline bye

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2598
  • Carma: +313/-518
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #669 on: May 01, 2024, 01:21:59 pm »
Testing out the camping charging system, namely the 14-50 extension cord and the Ford mobile charging cord 30A capability.
I figured, since I didn't have a 14-50 outlet handy at home, I'd use the Ford Pro Power to test it out !!


L14-30P connector plugged into the F150 Lightning bed 240V 30A outlet.
14-50 extension cord plugged into 14-30 to 14-50 connector.
Ford mobile charge station plugged into 14-50 cord.
Tesla charging using J1772 adaptor via Ford mobile cord at 30A 240V (7kW).
Ford Pro Power onboard enabled with minimum driving range of 85 km selected.
Ford truck “running”.






Offline bye

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2598
  • Carma: +313/-518
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #670 on: May 01, 2024, 01:33:42 pm »
Tested out the F150 Lightning ability to work on Tesla supercharger.
The A2Z adaptor was a tight fit to the Tesla charging cord, but I used the tried and true, force it till it fits method, ie, used the concrete pad as a brace and pressed the Tesla handle into the adaptor.
Used the Tesla app to initiate charging, plugged into truck and bingo, 80 kW of Tesla supercharged power at 77% state of charge on the truck.
Added 13 kWh in a few minutes at 60c/kWh.

For the upcoming road trip, I'll subscribe to the Tesla monthly charging plan to significantly reduce the rate:
https://www.tesla.com/en_ca/support/supercharging-other-evs#supercharging-membership



Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15752
  • Carma: +117/-436
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #671 on: May 01, 2024, 01:36:20 pm »
Looks busy lol.

Here is my campground of choice. I don't see where to plug in.  :rofl2:


Offline Great_Big_Abyss

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13744
  • Carma: +267/-457
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 Mazda CX-5
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #672 on: May 01, 2024, 01:58:31 pm »
This is probably his idea of camping:


Offline bridgecity

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6365
  • Carma: +126/-182
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 MDX; 2007 Tundra
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #673 on: May 01, 2024, 02:48:47 pm »
To be fair, there's different types of uses for an RV.  Some tow it directly to a location, and park and stay for whatever amount of time, and then travel home.  Others use them for traveling, making multiple stops, with the destination not being one location.  The trailer is more of a mobile hotel.  I don't think bye's intent is to "go camping" with his unit.  More so to see the country. 
Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives.

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15752
  • Carma: +117/-436
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #674 on: May 01, 2024, 03:04:23 pm »
Well you can tour in a nice 2 seater GT automobile and stay at quaint B&Bs or you can spend half your time in a KOA style parking lot parked cheek by jowl listening to your neighbours through paper thin walls  ;D All in cost is likely the same.


Offline bridgecity

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6365
  • Carma: +126/-182
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 MDX; 2007 Tundra
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #675 on: May 01, 2024, 03:43:56 pm »
Agreed, horses for courses and all that. 

Offline Allen

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 4235
  • Carma: +121/-437
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Q5 Sline, 2022 Honda HRV Touring
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #676 on: May 01, 2024, 04:29:13 pm »
He needed 3 parking spaces to complete  a charge  ::)

Offline bridgecity

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6365
  • Carma: +126/-182
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 MDX; 2007 Tundra
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #677 on: May 01, 2024, 04:30:09 pm »
He needed 3 parking spaces to complete  a charge  ::)

When he's towing his trailer he'll take up a lot more than that  ;D.  Unless he unhitches.

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 75793
  • Carma: +1253/-7198
    • View Profile
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #678 on: May 01, 2024, 11:57:39 pm »


.

For the upcoming road trip, I'll subscribe to the Tesla monthly charging plan to significantly reduce the rate:

As pictured, if you had a trailer it might be problematic to charge with the parking limitations?
How fast is my 911?  Supras sh*t on on me all the time...in reverse..with blown turbos  :( ...

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35368
  • Carma: +1423/-2113
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 Honda Ridgeline, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: 2022 F-150 Lightning
« Reply #679 on: May 02, 2024, 03:15:21 pm »
Looks busy lol.

Here is my campground of choice. I don't see where to plug in.  :rofl2:

That really looks like where I usually go camping, yeah, very little access to power.
Lighten up Francis.....