How about this?
I found this 2009 Honda Civic on AutoTrader: http://www.autotrader.ca/go/5-60597226
It's rotten man....
I have no idea.
But I do know everything in the $3k range will need a thorough inspection before pulling the trigger.
And Gurgie is handy, so he may save some $$ doing his own work.
Someone I know not long ago bought a nice Crown Vic for that kind of money...sellers said no one would buy it because of the V8. But this car definitely doesn't fall under "engaging" or "fun to drive". LOL [emoji38]
And yet I wouldn't be shocked if the performance from a V8 Crown Vic is not too dissimilar to an F body.
In the sense of being powered by a big lazy V8, yes. Straight-line, probably similar to many of the f-bodies out there. Handling and braking, not so much....Maybe the Police VCs got some upgrades, but the civilian models I've driven are super soft, wallowy and brakes are pretty mediocre. The f-bodies handle pretty well, especially for their time....back in the 80's they were widely regarded as some of the best handling cars on the market, and C&D had a habit of running them up against the front-engine Porsche's for comparos. Remember, we're talking around 40 years ago.....these (and the Corvette) were the first mainstream cars to wear properly wide tires, 245/55/16's, and the cars optioned up with the performance suspension like my T/A got sway bars the size of sewer pipes, factory Bilsteins, 4-wheel discs, etc. At the time, it was a revelation for American performance cars.
Good read on the f-body handling vs. a 944 from C&D:
https://www.thirdgen.org/besthandlingamericancarpart2-caranddriver-oct1984/For the 4th generation the engine got pushed waaaay back, essentially center of the motor sits where you'd expect the firewall to be with half the motor under the dash. Makes it annoying to work on, and the dead space infront of the motor looks silly, but it really improved the balance of the platform. Course by that point in the 90's there were quite a few more decent handling cars in the market.