Good Article, not many surprises. The Malibu has a curse, one generation its great, the next it's the bottom of the list. It would have been more fair if GM would supply the non ECO trim. If you remember the previous generation, it was a great family sedan, until the Kia Optima and Hyundai Sonata stepped up their game. As I have not sat in the new Ford Fusion, it's described as bland compared to the Focus and Escape, hey that may work for me, as I prefer things more straightforward, which is why VW interiors have been so functional for so long. As far as the Ford being more expensive, I mean none of these are imports, there are all made in the USA. But you just wait till summer and get Ford Employee Pricing, get a Costco card, and you save $4000 off the Accord. If price is your biggest issue.
What I was suprised by the new Accord (and the rest of the cars) is that the average fuel economy was 8.8L/100km. That it is with a reworked 2.4L (Earth Dream crap) and a CVT. Now the previous generation achieved an average of 9.2L/100km (as per your test drive), that's less than a 5% differance, so my question is: is this new Accord that much better than the previous generation. I find Honda, one generation to the next, there is little differance (Civic comes to mind for some reason), this time the Camry certainly is differant than the previous generation, as is the Ford Fusion.
I agree with others, a manual Mazda comparo (when available) would be great. I know they are hard to get, but I often see manual Accords and Fusions.