Author Topic: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012  (Read 12561 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« on: February 07, 2013, 06:26:17 am »


Check this practical compact sport utility vehicle for steering problems.

Read More...

Offline Frontier1

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3367
  • Carma: +25/-245
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2013, 08:45:26 am »
Check this, check that, that's an awful lot of checking ::)  A work colleague has had a less than stellar experience, an annoying no start condition that would require jiggling the shifter, looked at many times only to come back and haunt again.  Premature strut replacement and almost every part in the front end so she says.  Squeaks and rattles from the back area, likely the tire on the door I think.

Offline redman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3296
  • Carma: +100/-298
  • Gender: Male
  • Make mine a flat white, triple shot.
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2010 Subaru Legacy Limited, 2009 Pontiac Vibe GT son's
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2013, 09:18:29 am »
The best aspect of the Rav4 for me has been the 6 cylinder (which they dumped now). The  6 cyl engine beat many of the 4 cylinder competitors in power and fuel economy.

My biggest gripe has been with the fisher price looks, especially the spare tire at the rear. The other but mostly with all Toyota products is the over boosted steering lending itself to almost complete isolation from the road.

Not a true 4wd system but enough to make that group of buyers happy. I could mentioned who were the main group of buyers, but then again why start more useless rambling and debate.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2013, 02:44:29 pm by redman »
Past New (8yrs) Car Dealer for : BMW, Lexus, Nissan and Toyota<br />Past Used Vehicle Dealer: All Makes and Models. Seen a lot of it. Drove a lot of it. <br />Four-stroke Otto Engine 1876. Modern timer, pop-up toaster 1919 keep convincing yourself that you have the "latest appliance".

Offline Spec5

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • Carma: +8/-30
  • Gender: Male
  • Give me 3 pedals or no pedals!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 1987 Pontiac Firebird, 1999 Pontiac Sunfire GT, 1992 Ford Taurus SHO, 1989 Pontiac Bonneville, 2003 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, 2007 Hyundai Tucson, 2012 Honda Odyssey EX, 2016 Honda CRV SE
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2013, 01:03:45 pm »
My brother in law and his wife bought a used one from the states - they've been very happy with it - but I would put my '07 Tucson's old interior ahead of it any day. It definitely was designed in a different age - the replacement will be a welcome sight - well less the no V6 option.
My other Honda is an MP4-31!

Offline Vanstar

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Carma: +40/-236
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Acura TL, 2015 Kia Rio5
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2013, 04:04:30 pm »
When buying any used car, I do a lot of checking. FWIW one should budget a new battery on any used car. It's not like it's a lot of moeny.
I'd never join a group that would have me as a member.

Offline Gardiner Westbound

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 772
  • Carma: +22/-32
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2013, 04:20:13 pm »
When buying any used car, I do a lot of checking. FWIW one should budget a new battery on any used car. It's not like it's a lot of moeny.

Many batteries have a sticker on them that shows the install and/or warranty expiry date.
"When you invent a better mousetrap the mice tend to get smarter." - Willie Gingrich

Offline Vanstar

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Carma: +40/-236
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Acura TL, 2015 Kia Rio5
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2013, 05:11:15 pm »
When buying any used car, I do a lot of checking. FWIW one should budget a new battery on any used car. It's not like it's a lot of moeny.

Many batteries have a sticker on them that shows the install and/or warranty expiry date.

True but without the bill of sale for said battery, it would not be possible to get any warranty on it anyway.

Batteries last five years or so; we replace them at this interval because it's cheap insurance.

Offline dragonfly

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 397
  • Carma: +22/-90
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2013, 08:01:34 pm »
 The problem with the bursting external oil lines is a first...Why would oil lines burst?  And yes...this would probably lead to a blown engine..and a trip to the junkyard... The steering shaft sounds like another nightmare. How much is that to replace..$1000...2000..Sounds like it might be very expensive. You don't mention cost in the article..This car was ugly when first introduced and got even uglier with time...Jack

Offline PJungnitsch

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12708
  • Carma: +169/-337
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Travel in Africa
  • Cars: Subaru Crosstrek, Lexus RX350, Evolve Carbon, Biktrix Juggernaut, Yamaha TW200
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2013, 08:19:30 pm »
The steering shaft looks like an easy fix:

http://www.rav4world.com/forums/99-4-3-mechanical/91865-how-replace-intermediate-steering-shaft-solve-clunk-problem.html

And the part (at least in the US) is cheap, $91.00.

Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2013, 08:40:46 pm »
The problem with the bursting external oil lines is a first...

This is not the first time the oil line problem has been mentioned here. I've been pointing that out in every used Toyota review I wrote in my last two years writing for this site.
I used to work here.

Offline S. Aureus

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • Carma: +6/-8
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Subaru Outback 2014
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2013, 09:28:01 pm »
I test drove a 3.5 base model, and a 2.5 sport back in 2010.
For some reason, the 2.5 was more responsive in the city, than the 3.5. In the latter, the engine and the gearbox didn't seem to know what the other was doing at the moment. Weird... 

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27800
  • Carma: +310/-6811
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2013, 10:20:10 pm »
The problem with the bursting external oil lines is a first...Why would oil lines burst?  And yes...this would probably lead to a blown engine..and a trip to the junkyard... The steering shaft sounds like another nightmare. How much is that to replace..$1000...2000..Sounds like it might be very expensive. You don't mention cost in the article..This car was ugly when first introduced and got even uglier with time...Jack

Ya we get it JACK, you blame Toyota for America going into the toilet.  Don't dispare, Canada is close behind.  :)


Btw, JACK, Toyota will replace all those V6 leaky oil lines regardless of time or mileage on any affected V6 Toyota.   You think the D3 would do that?  :rofl2: 

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2013, 10:31:26 pm »
I see the mods are removing our anti-troll replies.  :rofl2: a little sensitive are we?  :rofl:
« Last Edit: February 07, 2013, 10:43:44 pm by Snowman »

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2013, 10:43:02 pm »
The problem with the bursting external oil lines is a first...Why would oil lines burst?  And yes...this would probably lead to a blown engine..and a trip to the junkyard... The steering shaft sounds like another nightmare. How much is that to replace..$1000...2000..Sounds like it might be very expensive. You don't mention cost in the article..This car was ugly when first introduced and got even uglier with time...Jack

Ya we get it JACK, you blame Toyota for America going into the toilet.  Don't dispare, Canada is close behind.  :)


Btw, JACK, Toyota will replace all those V6 leaky oil lines regardless of time or mileage on any affected V6 Toyota.   You think the D3 would do that?  :rofl2:

Yep, had one of them GM 4.3's with the exploding oil lines that cost me $1200 and sent me into the warm embracing arms of Toyota.

Offline Spec5

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • Carma: +8/-30
  • Gender: Male
  • Give me 3 pedals or no pedals!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 1987 Pontiac Firebird, 1999 Pontiac Sunfire GT, 1992 Ford Taurus SHO, 1989 Pontiac Bonneville, 2003 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, 2007 Hyundai Tucson, 2012 Honda Odyssey EX, 2016 Honda CRV SE
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2013, 11:02:27 pm »
I test drove a 3.5 base model, and a 2.5 sport back in 2010.
For some reason, the 2.5 was more responsive in the city, than the 3.5. In the latter, the engine and the gearbox didn't seem to know what the other was doing at the moment. Weird...

Funny back in 2007 when we bought our Tucson we test drove the V6 as well. I too remember the V6 feeling somewhat... Normal. Like it didn't feel sub 7 second 0-60 time - just waaay too smooth perhaps. But I also remember the tranny being "busy". My BIL's 4 pot oddly enough seemed less anxious almost - like a normal SUV. The V6 almost seemed like it was raring to go all the time. In the end it was a fair bit more expensive than our V6 Tucson and we both preferred the interior on the Viva Edition Tucson vs the Rav.

On another note - guess what I saw pulling into the Toyota lot tonight on my drive home from work!? I think it looks quite nice - the design is definitely Toyota conservative - front end kind of reminds me of the new Camry and the rear like a facelift gone wrong of the previous gen! :) All in all should sell tons to the elderly crowd!  ;D

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27800
  • Carma: +310/-6811
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2013, 11:28:36 pm »
Who wrote this article.  ???

Common Issues:    that windshield wipers are present and functioning     ::)   
                                       denting, peeling of paint or other visible damage   

The above are common issues to the Rav?  :P

Very LAZY reporting about the oil line issue and how it affects all 3.5 Toyotas up to and including my 2009 and that it's a FREE lifetime repair. 


Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2013, 02:38:43 pm »
... that it's a FREE lifetime repair.

But some of the replacement rubber hoses are failing too, apparently:

http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/122-2nd-generation-2008-2013/402325-2gr-fe-v6-lsc90k-recall-oil-line-fails-dealer-wont-cover-damages-warning.html

The metal line Toyota started using in 2008 would be a better solution for older engines with this problem.

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35336
  • Carma: +1423/-2113
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 Honda Ridgeline, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2013, 03:05:54 pm »
Sounds like a great all season vehicle, even with a couple of easily repaired problems. Good power out of the V6, roomy and I am one of the weird ones that think thats the perfect place for a spare tire. You try removing a spare from underneath a car when the undercarriage is covered in mud/ice, its really cold, or the snow is really deep.
Lighten up Francis.....

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27800
  • Carma: +310/-6811
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2013, 03:07:27 pm »
But some of the replacement rubber hoses are failing too, apparently:

Really Chris  ::), you dig up 4 alleged occurrences and one thread on Toyota Nation where a third party report talks about a lady having problems with a particular dealer in Texas over the oil line replacement job.

  Update February 7, 2012: Owner wrote to to the President & General manager of the dealerhip who was very responsive. In the end, toyota paid for everything. Owner essentially got a new engine including short block, camshft assemblies, water pump, etc.

There are over a million of these lines out there.  When you get to 10K verified instances of replacement hoses "BLOWING" please contact me.  BTW, for general information purposes, the hoses don't BLOW.  They develope tiny holes that seep oil.  NORMAL ppl see signs of the leak or smell something and bring the vehicle in.  :)


 




Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Toyota RAV4, 2006-2012
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2013, 03:26:51 pm »
Really, Steve, yes. That thread's brand new. Might lead to more occurrences of the same; might not. Time will tell. There are a lot more Toyotas on the road than yours and Snowman's.