Author Topic: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012  (Read 7978 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« on: April 12, 2012, 04:03:41 am »


The second-generation Ford Fusion was an improvement over its predecessor in most respects -- except for reliability.

Read More...

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15582
  • Carma: +416/-1000
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '17 BMW X5 Xdrive35i, '11 BMW 328iXdrive,
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 06:04:26 am »
I'm a little surprised to read about these issues. Ford has been doing so much better in reliability lately. Too bad they've had this stumble. It's kind of ironic that the biggest trouble spot seems to have come from partnering with GM  ::)............

Put two of the D3 together and you get double the trouble!  ;D
Old Jag convertible...one itch I won't have to scratch again.

Offline hemusbull

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 877
  • Carma: +15/-153
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 08:32:59 am »
So Ford recreated its after pre-bancrupcy image, built first generation Fusions as a reliable cars and is back on track to build traditional north american family sedans with so-so reliablility. Although I wasn't sure Ford is the main culprit for the reliability issues of previous gen Mazda 6, now it seems to me I'm right. overall, the six speed auto tranny is a main issue for their counterparts from GM as well.

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2012, 08:54:24 am »
It's too bad about the newer model being less reliable, makes you wonder about the upcoming model, who makes that transmission?  I also thought GM made pretty good transmissions, never had any issues on my Grand Prix, or G6. 

So would a manual transmission be fairly reliable? I also don't see the Black Book value usually posted in a used vehicle review.

Good article

Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2012, 11:21:00 am »
It's too bad about the newer model being less reliable, makes you wonder about the upcoming model, who makes that transmission?  I also thought GM made pretty good transmissions, never had any issues on my Grand Prix, or G6. 

So would a manual transmission be fairly reliable? I also don't see the Black Book value usually posted in a used vehicle review.

The manual trans would probably be a good buy, but there are so few of them around that it's hard to judge just how robust they are.

I stopped including values in the review itself, because that information goes out of date within weeks of publication. Values are still there, though, in the chart at the bottom.

Nothing of which applies to the Sport model...phew (dream land is awesome...)...at least not the trans issue, or the heater core...

Maybe I should buy the extra warranty the service guy's trying to sell me... :-\

Watch that driveshaft! :-P I seem to remember the first-gen AWD models having a problem with leaking driveaxle seals, but not sure if that carried over to the second-gen cars.
I used to work here.

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2012, 03:03:23 pm »
I am not sure if there is a bad link, but when I got view the comments, it takes me straight to the forum section.  Any idea if it is the same manual from the previous generation, the one paired with the 2.3L which I assume is in the Mazda3 and Mazda6?

Offline Blueprint

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 10047
  • Carma: +169/-232
  • Gender: Male
  • member since way back when
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2024 Mazda CX-90 GS-L PHEV, 2022 Subaru Crosstrek Limited, 1975 Triumph TR6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2012, 09:10:22 pm »
I put 2700km on an early 2010 rental Fusion SEL V-6, and loved it.  As rentals go, this one was surprising: black on black leather (nice white stitching  8) ), moonroof, that V-6, the Sony 12-speaker stereo, 2-zone HVAC ... felt and drove like a budget A4.  From Calgary to Jasper to Vancouver and back, netted 8.5 l/100 km average, and not because of conservative driving  :drive:

The CEL came on one chilly morning, and went off later.  Might have been the new cap-less fuel filler door.
Traffic engineer/project manager & part time auto journalist

Offline Benhaze

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2355
  • Carma: +29/-63
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2012, 02:57:41 pm »

Our 2010 Sport Fusion (3.5L AWD) with 27,000 Km has been absolutely flawless. Not a single concern with either engine, transmission or driveshaft. And consider this car has all the bells and whistles available on any Fusion and there has been no electrical issue as well. Blind spot detector and cross alert traffic are amazing features that are very well executed in this car.

We could not be anymore satisfied with our Fusion.

Offline Sir Osis of Liver

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 28596
  • Carma: +1376/-1726
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramblin' man
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 KTM DUKE 390, 2019 VW Jetta GLI 35th Anniversary
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2012, 11:21:37 pm »
The issues mentioned really don't seem to show up in Consumer Reports surveys. No doubt some people have issues, but the same can be said of any car.

On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

H. L. Mencken

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14597
  • Carma: +240/-570
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2012, 08:33:08 am »
Thats a lot of red dots.
You can't just have your characters announce how they feel.
That makes me feel angry!

Present: 15.5 V60 T6 + Polestar, 17 MDX
Sometimes Borrow: 11 GLK350
Dark and Twisted Past: 13 TL AWD, 07 Z4 3.0si, 07 CLK550, 06 TSX, 07 Civic, 01 Grandma!

Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2012, 10:10:18 am »
The issues mentioned really don't seem to show up in Consumer Reports surveys. No doubt some people have issues, but the same can be said of any car.

I don't like relying on CR exclusively. Hence the inclusion of anecdotal stuff, and True Delta data. I find that gives a more rounded view of the car.

Offline Cord

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Carma: +104/-115
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2012, 12:14:10 pm »
The issues mentioned really don't seem to show up in Consumer Reports surveys. No doubt some people have issues, but the same can be said of any car.

I don't like relying on CR exclusively. Hence the inclusion of anecdotal stuff, and True Delta data. I find that gives a more rounded view of the car.

Plus, it provides something to write about.  ;)
"If we can just believe something then we don't have to really think for ourselves, do we?" Paul Haggis

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2012, 01:33:36 pm »
The issues mentioned really don't seem to show up in Consumer Reports surveys. No doubt some people have issues, but the same can be said of any car.

Agreed, I will take CR's word on reliability issues over any other organization. Not the perfect gauge but better than the others.

Offline northsparrow

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Carma: +13/-27
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2012, 08:02:37 am »
"An automobile has about 10,000 moving parts, right? An airplane has about 2,000,000 and it has to stay
up in the air."


This quotation comes from Alan Mulally after he left  Boeing to take over Ford.

Offline Ontariodriver

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2546
  • Carma: +38/-239
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2012, 07:37:50 pm »
So rule of thumb. Buy the pre-face-lift.....I have always hated the looks of the face-lift fusion...Only a face a mother could love....LOL.



Offline Sir Osis of Liver

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 28596
  • Carma: +1376/-1726
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramblin' man
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 KTM DUKE 390, 2019 VW Jetta GLI 35th Anniversary
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Ford Fusion, 2010-2012
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2012, 07:42:42 pm »
So rule of thumb. Buy the pre-face-lift.....I have always hated the looks of the face-lift fusion...Only a face a mother could love....LOL.

No.