We'll agree to disagree. You can't convince me for one second that the people that accepted this guy's $55k are on the up and up and the money went to any type of reputable cause. They baited the lion outside of the park, it was shot with a bow OUTSIDE the park, didn't actually kill it for another 40 hours where they skinned and beheaded it. Oh, and they tried to destroy the gps device on the lion as well, although unsuccessfully. I don't think our viewpoints will ever be the same on this subject.
Yes, we my never agree and I love that. We can have a good debate, share our ideas and thoughts and still be friends after the fact. Love it!
I'm not sure I made it clear, so I'll just add this last bit....
He has to buy a HUNTING LICENSE before any type of hunting can occur. In ANY country. This comes from a gov't agency (like when you buy your fishing license in NB). Except in Africa, you also have to have an outfitter or they won't grant a license. Mainly because they don't want you getting eaten or lost while you walk around by yourself in the bush. So you have to be aligned with an outfitter to get the license. This is separate from the outfitter costs and those are added onto the bill. Every year, the outfitters apply TO THE GOVERNMENT to get the licenses. Sometimes the licenses get issued direct and easy if some animals are overpopulating the area (gazelle, zebra, etc), for managed hunts (lions, elephants) and other times they are via lottery only (for a rhino for example). Either way, permit comes from the GOVERNMENT agency. In this case the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority grants the licenses for this area. The rest of the ~$30K went to the outfitter, which is run by a PH (Professional Hunter) who is also licensed by the gov't. So if you think the money isn't going to conservation, then you have a problem with the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, right?
Now here's where it went off the track. According to Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (issuers of licenses), they originally said all licensing was in order. What
wasn't in order was the farmer on who's land they were hunting, a guy named Honest Trymore Ndlovu. (Doesn't seem too honest, BTW). He wasn't part of the game management area and therefore people couldn't legally hunt on his land. So that means any hunting that occurs on his land even with LEGAL permits means the whole hunt is illegal. Had he been properly licensed as part of the game management area, shooting the lion in the way the did would have been 100% legal. Cowardly, but legal.
To sum up. The PH was legally licensed (but a douche). The hunter was legally licensed (but a douche). They are licensed by Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority who issues hunting licenses and uses the proceeds for conservation efforts. The farmer on who's land the lion was taken was NOT legal. And is also a douche. Did the hunter know this? We don't know yet. I'm guessing someone flips on someone (either Ndlovu or the PH) and blames it all on the rich American. We will find out August 5 I think.
And yes mmret, my argument was in general. But in this case, initially, the reports stated everything was legally licensed but the farmer guy.
And yes, I don't think we'll ever agree about how much hunters do for conservation.
Article from today:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/11771112/Trophy-hunting-can-be-a-lifeline-for-Africas-wildlife.htmlOh and here's a price list for license and trophies fees. Basically, take the license fee an double it and that's what your trip will cost total:
http://www.africanskyhunting.co.za/pricelist.html