Author Topic: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS  (Read 7936 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« on: June 06, 2014, 06:28:13 am »


Love doesn't always make sense.

Read More...

Offline Ace

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 338
  • Carma: +11/-61
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 14' Hyundai Santa Fe Sport , 06' Nissan XTrail
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2014, 09:40:55 am »
I can't believe you are giving this thing  a 4.5/5 for exterior styling. IMO the ugliest car I've ever seen :rofl:

Offline redman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3296
  • Carma: +100/-298
  • Gender: Male
  • Make mine a flat white, triple shot.
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2010 Subaru Legacy Limited, 2009 Pontiac Vibe GT son's
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2014, 10:05:05 am »
Going by the original concept I'm surprised at the engine choice and poor F.E. Seems like a bigger engine would have been a better choice.
Past New (8yrs) Car Dealer for : BMW, Lexus, Nissan and Toyota<br />Past Used Vehicle Dealer: All Makes and Models. Seen a lot of it. Drove a lot of it. <br />Four-stroke Otto Engine 1876. Modern timer, pop-up toaster 1919 keep convincing yourself that you have the "latest appliance".

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27802
  • Carma: +310/-6811
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2014, 10:14:02 am »
What a ridiculous car.  Every 1.6 Juke is getting a replacement timing chain.  Something is wrong with the overall design of the chain system.  This is just a band aid.

Versa, Rogue and Altima.  3 vehicles to sustain life at a Nissan store and Nissan wastes resources on a Juke Nismo.  ::)

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18493
  • Carma: +254/-768
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2014, 10:27:39 am »
Price is surprisingly low IMO.

Offline pcsp

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 463
  • Carma: +38/-53
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Nissan Juke AWD (current), 2008 HHR SS (current), 1974 Mazda 929, Triumph TR6, VW Diesel PU, 1981 VW Cabriolet, 1987 Dodge Raider, etc.
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2014, 11:08:38 am »
You know I've got to comment since I own a Juke. Jacob, good to see that you "get" this vehicle. Great, hilarious article. Obviously, looks are subjective, but to me an "ugly" vehicle is one that may be disproportionate, lots of overhang, mismatched pieces, etc. The Juke's uniqueness and overall statement it makes is consistent. To me, at least, it's really good looking. Hey, vanilla is out there if that's what you want.

Fuel mileage I have found to be fair. In pure city driving, it excels (8.0 or better), but doesn't improve much on the highway (probably the snout). I have the 188 hp AWD - the 215 hp Nismo may be worse. Nissan also cleverly improved the cargo capacity of the 2014 by 40%. Seems the floor has been deepened. Should now hold about 49 cu. ft. with seats folded.

Nismo version does look good. Over time, I'm going to incorporate some of the pieces on mine (LED strips/lights, spoiler, etc.). 215 hp in a vehicle weighing just over 2900 lbs. should get you to 60 in mid 6's. As was said above, priced well also.

Offline SaskSpecV

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2322
  • Carma: +87/-149
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Subaru Forester Touring 6MT, 2009 Hyundai Elantra Touring GLsport 5MT, 2009 GMC Sierra 2500 6.0L
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2014, 11:44:22 am »
Every 1.6 Juke is getting a replacement timing chain.  Something is wrong with the overall design of the chain system.  This is just a band aid.

Maybe one of the reasons why Nissan hasn't put their 1.6 turbo into any other vehicle?  When the Juke first came out, I assumed that its powertrain would migrate to the Sentra for sure, and maybe a "hot hatch" Versa, possibly even the Rogue and Altima once it established a proven track record.  But maybe it's not robust enough for "conventional" vehicles?

Jacob, how would you describe the overall experience of the Juke NISMO RS vs the Focus ST?  And what's the difference between this vehicle and the "non-RS" NISMO Juke?

Offline JacobBlack

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2593
  • Carma: +440/-499
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Ford F-150
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2014, 11:50:23 am »
Every 1.6 Juke is getting a replacement timing chain.  Something is wrong with the overall design of the chain system.  This is just a band aid.

Maybe one of the reasons why Nissan hasn't put their 1.6 turbo into any other vehicle?  When the Juke first came out, I assumed that its powertrain would migrate to the Sentra for sure, and maybe a "hot hatch" Versa, possibly even the Rogue and Altima once it established a proven track record.  But maybe it's not robust enough for "conventional" vehicles?

Jacob, how would you describe the overall experience of the Juke NISMO RS vs the Focus ST?  And what's the difference between this vehicle and the "non-RS" NISMO Juke?

No idea sorry, haven't yet driven the Focus ST. Drove a Focus RS in Australia though. That's a proper sports car, this is a warm CUV.

Offline nlm

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1337
  • Carma: +58/-82
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2014, 01:09:27 pm »
Wouldn't the AWD with proper torque vectoring take care of the understeer in the Juke, NISMO or otherwise?

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35360
  • Carma: +1423/-2113
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 Honda Ridgeline, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2014, 01:12:49 pm »
Great review....and Im with you Jacob.....I really like this thing. An awd with a 6spd manual would make this thing perfect in my books.
Lighten up Francis.....

Offline JacobBlack

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2593
  • Carma: +440/-499
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Ford F-150
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2014, 01:17:05 pm »
Wouldn't the AWD with proper torque vectoring take care of the understeer in the Juke, NISMO or otherwise?

Good point, torque vectoring would help the understeer. Of course, then you would be driving it with a CVT.

Offline pcsp

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 463
  • Carma: +38/-53
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Nissan Juke AWD (current), 2008 HHR SS (current), 1974 Mazda 929, Triumph TR6, VW Diesel PU, 1981 VW Cabriolet, 1987 Dodge Raider, etc.
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2014, 01:27:46 pm »
Wouldn't the AWD with proper torque vectoring take care of the understeer in the Juke, NISMO or otherwise?

Good point, torque vectoring would help the understeer. Of course, then you would be driving it with a CVT.

My AWD Juke completely addresses the torque steer problems, as you indicated, and probably helps with understeer (although I don't perceive it as a problem). I see the well-sorted CVT, however, as a major plus. No more 4, 6, 9, or 15 speed transmissions for me. Too many drawbacks compared to the new generation of CVTs.

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35360
  • Carma: +1423/-2113
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 Honda Ridgeline, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2014, 01:29:39 pm »
Wouldn't the AWD with proper torque vectoring take care of the understeer in the Juke, NISMO or otherwise?

Good point, torque vectoring would help the understeer. Of course, then you would be driving it with a CVT.

My AWD Juke completely addresses the torque steer problems, as you indicated. I see the well-sorted CVT, however, as a major plus. No more 4, 6, 9, or 15 speed transmissions for me. Too many drawbacks compared to the new generation of CVTs.

You know whats even way better in every way than a "well sorted CVT"




 ;D

Offline pcsp

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 463
  • Carma: +38/-53
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Nissan Juke AWD (current), 2008 HHR SS (current), 1974 Mazda 929, Triumph TR6, VW Diesel PU, 1981 VW Cabriolet, 1987 Dodge Raider, etc.
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2014, 01:34:03 pm »
Wouldn't the AWD with proper torque vectoring take care of the understeer in the Juke, NISMO or otherwise?

Good point, torque vectoring would help the understeer. Of course, then you would be driving it with a CVT.

My AWD Juke completely addresses the torque steer problems, as you indicated. I see the well-sorted CVT, however, as a major plus. No more 4, 6, 9, or 15 speed transmissions for me. Too many drawbacks compared to the new generation of CVTs.

You know whats even way better in every way than a "well sorted CVT"




 ;D

In an AWD Juke?

Offline Weels

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6377
  • Carma: +253/-259
  • Gender: Male
  • This is my happy face
    • View Profile
  • Cars: The 5's: 2023 Mazda CX-5, 2016 Mazda MX-5
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2014, 01:36:59 pm »
Assume this is the beastie that will be in the upcoming comparo?
Surprised JY hasn't added his opinion here yet...  ;D



Offline Nuttygent

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 169
  • Carma: +7/-20
  • Every man dies...but not every man lives
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Forte5 SX
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2014, 01:54:39 pm »
  So sad, what a waste of an engine. The little Micra looks far better than the Juke, in fact that would a fun combo!

Offline dirtyjeffer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 17120
  • Carma: +296/-1312
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Toyota Venza Limited, 2016 Kia Sorento EX AWD
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2014, 01:55:37 pm »
i took a loaded AWD CVT Juke for a test drive a couple of years ago when i was in the market...as i've said before, i loved it...it was small, but fun.
When you've lost the argument, admit defeat and hit the smite button.

Offline jamesautos

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 375
  • Carma: +14/-59
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2014, 02:10:48 pm »
the seats are the only redeeming factors for this car...
with the mini cooper S, fiesta ST and focus ST all priced cheaper than this car...why would anyone pick this over the others

if you want AWD...the WRX starts at 30k and thats real AWD rather than this FWD biased system

Offline dirtyjeffer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 17120
  • Carma: +296/-1312
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Toyota Venza Limited, 2016 Kia Sorento EX AWD
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2014, 03:05:07 pm »
the new Mini Cooper and WRX are nice too...if only i was a billionaire and had a house with a 50 car garage.  :(

Offline pcsp

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 463
  • Carma: +38/-53
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Nissan Juke AWD (current), 2008 HHR SS (current), 1974 Mazda 929, Triumph TR6, VW Diesel PU, 1981 VW Cabriolet, 1987 Dodge Raider, etc.
Re: Test Drive: 2014 Nissan Juke NISMO RS
« Reply #19 on: June 06, 2014, 03:14:40 pm »
the seats are the only redeeming factors for this car...
with the mini cooper S, fiesta ST and focus ST all priced cheaper than this car...why would anyone pick this over the others

if you want AWD...the WRX starts at 30k and thats real AWD rather than this FWD biased system

The Juke actually has a real torque vectoring system rather than the faux, brake-based system used on the new WRX.