You guys have to get some sort of test equipment. Saying that it's "acceleratively challenged" doesn't really tell me much. Acceleratively challenged for me, or for Jaeger? Hard to know without a number to quantify it.
MT got 0-60 in 6.2, which for a sports coupe is a bit on the tepid side, but I could live with it.
Wing, I'll just pull over on the side of the 400, then measure 0-140 km/h... I would like to get the instruments, the time, resources and place to do instrumented testing...
I'll often cite C&D or MT numbers, but their 6.0-6.2 range doesn't sound that slow on paper, but it sure feels slow driving it... the manual was much more direct in its power delivery, and seemed to have much better in-gear acceleration, probably because of the closer packed, shorter gearing in manual models:
from
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5404FR-S Gear Ratio Comparison
____AT ___MT __# differenc _% difference
1 _3.626 __3.538 __0.088 ____2%
2 _2.188 __2.06 ___0.128 ____6%
3 _1.541 __1.404 __0.137 ____10%
4 _1.213 __1 ______0.213 ____21%
5 _1 ______0.713 __0.287 ____40%
6 _0.767 __0.582 __0.185 ____32%
R _3.437 __3.168 __0.269 ____8%
not sure how reliable that info is, but Toyota Canada doesn't have gear ratios on their scion site or their media site...
BRZ did the 1/14 mile in 14.9 sec @ 94.4 mph, but the video in which i sourced that is hilarious to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaS7n6qKQe4BRZ finishes last, but in style!