Author Topic: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV  (Read 13088 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« on: August 26, 2014, 06:28:39 am »


Much-loved Micra makes Lesley smile.

Read More...

Offline JohnM

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1132
  • Carma: +70/-99
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2014, 07:18:54 am »
Cheap and cheerful is good but 8.3 just isn't small hatch territory.

I'm sure others will comment on the value of the Micra at the as tested price.   I like nippy little cars but I don't particularly see what is special about the Micra at it's as tested price.

Cheers,
John M.

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18478
  • Carma: +254/-768
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2014, 07:57:52 am »
I wonder if the manual would improve fuel economy?

I don't care for much of what Nissan is building these days but I really like the look of the Micra and it sounds like a decent value too.

Offline superukr

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 364
  • Carma: +17/-34
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2014, 08:17:27 am »
my Mazda3 is showing 6.5l/100km average

Offline jamesautos

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 375
  • Carma: +14/-59
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2014, 08:19:43 am »
"The bottom-line buy-in refers, of course, to a base S model stripper with manual transmission, roll-down windows, and no air."

this car only make sense in the base trim. 
For $16800, it is better to get a compact car or better yet something used with a certified program

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18478
  • Carma: +254/-768
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2014, 08:28:26 am »
"The bottom-line buy-in refers, of course, to a base S model stripper with manual transmission, roll-down windows, and no air."

this car only make sense in the base trim. 
For $16800, it is better to get a compact car or better yet something used with a certified program

Is it even possible to buy an automatic compact with air conditioning for under $17k with freight?

Offline Rupert

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
  • Carma: +49/-160
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2014, 08:48:34 am »
   I think that the article captures the spirit of the little car. Makes you smile when you get in...I like that. I bought the SR....I know...I know...I could have got this, or that, for the same money. But both of those would not have been this great looking little car. 45 MPG. highway (experienced seemingly) is not too shabby. I don't care about heated seats or leather ones. I like the leather steering wheel and great looking sills and rear spoiler. They should include the sills on the SV I think. The four speed automatic works just fine. The engine is plenty powerful for me and I don't know what is meant by raspyness on hard acceleration...it's the normal sound of an engine working for pete's sake...'normal'...what's not to like.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13563
  • Carma: +774/-2131
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '11 Fozzie XT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2014, 09:03:37 am »
Quote
Whlle it may not go down in the annals of automotive history as one of its celebrated legends, the daily driver holds a place near and dear in many of our hearts.
^^

As for fuel economy, my 2010 Corolla showed 7.9L/100km in pure city, 13km each way commuting in the GTA (which takes 35-45 mins).  I say it again - I don't think these smaller engines are beneficial for fuel economy; rather, only for cost-cutting.

I know we're beating the dead horse (poor Seabiscuit), but I think it's reasonable considering how often the Micra is reviewed by Autos.ca  ;D  Even at ~$15k, if you're going for a stripper, I simply don't see the value in these subcompacts.  The Fiesta doesn't feel like such a penalty box to me, nor the Rio/Accent, but the Micra just exudes "look at me, I'm cheap and 'almost' cute!"

To a consumer, as far as I can see, all that matters is "what can I get for $##,###."  If someone truly has only $12,797 (base model + HST + freight) to spend and they want to keep it for 10+ years, there are so many used buys that are better than this.  "Used" doesn't have to mean a 7+ year old car - 1-2 year old Hyundai/Kias go for about that price (or can be negotiated as such) and will have the same warranty remaining (since they give a 5 year warranty instead of Nissan's 3 year) - so the warranty argument doesn't hold.

45 MPG. highway (experienced seemingly) is not too shabby.
Imperial Gallons are stupid - don't use them.

6.5L/100km = 36.19 MPG 'experienced seemingly'

Every weekend from Toronto to Ithaca, NY, I average <6L/100km at 120km/h and usual traffic to the border, incl the border idling, in my Corolla.  That's > 39.20 MPG, 'very much experienced.'

Offline greengs

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1099
  • Carma: +26/-57
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 BRZ
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2014, 09:40:09 am »
IMO, it doesn't matter what someone with another car gets, unless you replicated the author's drive exactly comparasons mean little.

Micra is rated at  8.6 L/100 km city, 6.6L highway
2014 Mazda 3 2.0 auto: 8.0/5.8
2010 Corolla 1.8 auto: 8.8/6.8

These are Canadian 5 cycle numbers.  It's the best way to compare between gas engines I think. 

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18478
  • Carma: +254/-768
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2014, 09:57:36 am »
IMO, it doesn't matter what someone with another car gets, unless you replicated the author's drive exactly comparasons mean little.

Micra is rated at  8.6 L/100 km city, 6.6L highway
2014 Mazda 3 2.0 auto: 8.0/5.8
2010 Corolla 1.8 auto: 8.8/6.8

These are Canadian 5 cycle numbers.  It's the best way to compare between gas engines I think.

2015 numbers are changing though, so you can't compare them to 2014.

Offline Rupert

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
  • Carma: +49/-160
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2014, 10:21:10 am »

Imperial Gallons are stupid - don't use them.

6.5L/100km = 36.19 MPG 'experienced seemingly'

   Your math is incorrect. We managed for donkeys years with Imp. and it's hard to break a habit. Actually the number above is closer to a US gal. but still not right there either I think. You may not be doing your Corolla justice either MPGI wise.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 10:35:14 am by Rupert »

Offline greengs

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1099
  • Carma: +26/-57
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 BRZ
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2014, 10:24:50 am »
IMO, it doesn't matter what someone with another car gets, unless you replicated the author's drive exactly comparasons mean little.

Micra is rated at  8.6 L/100 km city, 6.6L highway
2014 Mazda 3 2.0 auto: 8.0/5.8
2010 Corolla 1.8 auto: 8.8/6.8

These are Canadian 5 cycle numbers.  It's the best way to compare between gas engines I think.

I grabbed 2015 for all the cars above, that's why Corolla is so high. 
2015 numbers are changing though, so you can't compare them to 2014.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13563
  • Carma: +774/-2131
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '11 Fozzie XT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2014, 10:48:39 am »
6.5L/100km = 36.19 MPG 'experienced seemingly'

Every weekend from Toronto to Ithaca, NY, I average <6L/100km at 120km/h and usual traffic to the border, incl the border idling, in my Corolla.  That's > 39.20 MPG, 'very much experienced.'
6.5L/100km = 36.19 MPG 'experienced seemingly'

   Your math is incorrect.

Offline Lesley

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 403
  • Carma: +22/-47
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 97 Dodge Dakota "The Mighty Dak", 92 Mazda MX3 KLZE, 92 Mazda 323 winter beater
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2014, 11:08:46 am »

Imperial Gallons are stupid - don't use them.

6.5L/100km = 36.19 MPG 'experienced seemingly'

   Your math is incorrect. We managed for donkeys years with Imp. and it's hard to break a habit. Actually the number above is closer to a US gal. but still not right there either I think. You may not be doing your Corolla justice either MPGI wise.

Donkey's Years? Are you a Brit? Haven't heard that expression in a while - my mom used to say that (I came over as a 2 year old).
If I can't drive 'em... I'll draw 'em!

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13883
  • Carma: +289/-388
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2014, 12:02:32 pm »
IMO, it doesn't matter what someone with another car gets, unless you replicated the author's drive exactly comparasons mean little.

Micra is rated at  8.6 L/100 km city, 6.6L highway
2014 Mazda 3 2.0 auto: 8.0/5.8
2010 Corolla 1.8 auto: 8.8/6.8

These are Canadian 5 cycle numbers.  It's the best way to compare between gas engines I think.

2015 numbers are changing though, so you can't compare them to 2014.

He got those 5-cycle numbers from NRCAN's website which displays both the old 2-cycle numbers the car was originally sold with and the 5-cycle equivalent for comparison purposes.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13563
  • Carma: +774/-2131
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '11 Fozzie XT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2014, 12:14:32 pm »
He got those 5-cycle numbers from NRCAN's website which displays both the old 2-cycle numbers the car was originally sold with and the 5-cycle equivalent for comparison purposes.
Have all the older cars been actually tested for the new 5-cycle equivalent, or an algorithm 'guesses'?

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13883
  • Carma: +289/-388
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2014, 12:36:10 pm »
Have all the older cars been actually tested for the new 5-cycle equivalent, or an algorithm 'guesses'?

I'm sure they found a conversion factor between the two, +/- 5%. But to answer your multiple choice question, algorithm 'guesses'.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13563
  • Carma: +774/-2131
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '11 Fozzie XT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2014, 02:30:43 pm »
then, in my mind, credibility of conversion = shot.

Offline jaari

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Carma: +13/-36
    • View Profile
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2014, 02:35:44 pm »
Ha Ha the silver blue is same color as our '86 Micra we had.
Miss it and hated it becasue of so many problems lol.

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13883
  • Carma: +289/-388
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Test Drive: 2015 Nissan Micra SV
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2014, 03:16:56 pm »
then, in my mind, credibility of conversion = shot.

If you convert the 2008-2014 EPA numbers to l/100km, they're pretty much in line.