Author Topic: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks  (Read 713 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6517
  • Carma: +80/-441
  • member
    • View Profile
IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« on: December 21, 2012, 08:41:12 am »


To reward 2013 models with superior crash protection, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is awarding the new Top Safety Pick+ accolade to 13 cars. All earn good or acceptable ratings in the new IIHS small overlap test as well as top marks in other IIHS evaluations.
Read More...

Offline chamadarla

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 132
  • Carma: +31/-67
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Pontiac
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2012, 09:47:45 am »
The article is now complete............ ;D

Toyota falls short

Shoppers looking for a midprice family car will recognize some perennial bestsellers on the TOP
SAFETY PICK+ winners' list, including the Accord, Altima and Fusion.

One nameplate they won't find is Toyota. The Camry, which is the top-selling midsize car in the United States, and the Prius v, a 4-door hybrid wagon, earn poor ratings for small overlap protection and are the worst performers of the midsize group. The Camry was redesigned for 2012, and the Prius v was an all-new model for 2012.

The Camry and Prius v illustrate what can go wrong in a small overlap crash, despite good ratings in IIHS tests that qualify the cars for TOP SAFETY PICK.

Most modern cars have safety cages built to withstand head-on collisions and moderate overlap frontal crashes with little deformation, and the two Toyotas are no exception. Crush zones help manage crash energy to reduce forces on the occupant compartment. The main crush-zone structures are concentrated in the middle 50 percent of the front end. When a crash involves these structures, the occupant compartment is protected from intrusion, and front airbags and safety belts can effectively restrain and protect people inside.

For many vehicles, a 25 percent overlap frontal impact misses the primary structures designed to manage crash energy and results in crash forces going directly into the wheel, suspension system and firewall. Such crashes often have high levels of occupant compartment intrusion. It is not uncommon for the wheel to be forced rearward into the footwell, contributing to even more intrusion in the occupant compartment and resulting in serious leg and foot injuries. Since the impact occurs toward the car's outer edge, the vehicle has a tendency to rotate during the collision, resulting in the driver's head moving outboard, away from the frontal airbag. Real crashes of this type result in head injuries from contact with outboard structures or intruding objects such as trees or poles.

In the Camry, the force of the impact shoved the front wheel back into the footwell, bending the windshield pillar and pushing the parking brake pedal and the left outer edge of the instrument panel rearward into the driver's survival space. Likewise, there was significant intrusion in the Prius v, along with high forces on the dummy's legs and feet. The Prius v is the only car in the midsize test group to earn a poor rating for hip and thigh protection.

The Camry's driver airbag and side curtain airbag deployed, but the steering wheel moved so far to the right that the dummy's head made only minimal contact with the front airbag. The side curtain airbag didn't extend far enough forward to help prevent the dummy's head from hitting the instrument panel. In the Prius v, the side curtain airbag deployed too late in the crash to offer protection.

"Toyota engineers have a lot of work to do to match the performance of their competitors," Lund says.
 

Demanding crash

The small overlap frontal test represents a severe crash. When cars strike the test barrier they tend to move sideways away from it, and the interior structures including the driver door, side window and windshield pillar move in the same direction. The dummy, however, continues forward into the path of the sideways-moving interior structures. At the same time, the steering column and driver airbag move inboard in many vehicles as the front end and occupant compartment deform. If the dummy misses the airbag or slides off it, its head and chest are unprotected.

Front airbags are calibrated to deploy in these crashes. Side airbags, especially head-protecting curtains, don't always deploy because they are designed mainly for direct side impacts. When they do deploy, they don't always do so early enough or extend far enough forward to adequately protect people. The result is an airbag gray zone with gaps between what front airbags cover and what side airbags do — if they deploy at all.

Without airbag protection, people in real-world small overlap frontal crashes can sustain head injuries from direct contact with the windshield pillar, dashboard or window sill or by hitting trees, poles or other objects. Chest injuries happen when people contact the steering wheel, door or other intruding structures.

The Accord sedan shows how safety belts and airbags work together to provide exemplary protection. The dummy stayed engaged with the Accord's front airbag, and the steering wheel remained relatively stable because there was only moderate intrusion into the occupant compartment. That meant that the driver airbag was in the right position to cushion the dummy's head and chest. The side curtain airbag extended far enough forward to prevent the dummy's head from hitting interior components.

Every midsize car evaluated earns good ratings for head, neck and chest injury risk based on measurements from dummy sensors. Similar real-world crashes, however, often result in serious upper body injuries. One possible reason for the differing results is that real people move more during a crash and are prone to be out of position at the start, compared with relatively stiff and precisely positioned crash test dummies. Not all drivers are the same size as the dummy or seated the same way. A close call for the dummy could mean an actual injury for a person. Another reason is that the frontal crash dummy IIHS uses in the small overlap test isn't good at measuring risks from lateral forces. Side crash dummies do a better job of this but can't record much of the frontal action in these tests.

"The dummy doesn't always tell us everything," Lund says. "The crash damage in these tests is like the damage we see in real-world crashes where heads and chests are injured."

 

Unexpected outcomes

In the Jetta test, engineers at the Vehicle Research Center witnessed a first for IIHS crash testing when the driver airbag module detached from the steering column. It happened relatively late in the crash and didn't affect the dummy's movement. Still, airbags should stay in place in crashes, so engineers had to lower the restraints and kinematics score for the marginal-rated Jetta. IIHS isn't aware of a problem with Volkswagen's airbag module in real-world crashes, and Volkswagen is investigating further.

The Kizashi's results also are unique. The car, which Suzuki introduced in the 2010 model year, is the only midsize moderately priced car to earn a good rating for structure in the small overlap test. The Kizashi also earns good ratings in the moderate overlap frontal test, side test and seat/head restraint evaluation. Its roof strength rating, however, is acceptable, so it has never qualified for TOP SAFETY PICK.

"The Kizashi is a rare case. Its good small overlap test performance outweighs its acceptable rollover rating, so the car is a TOP SAFETY PICK+. So far this is the only model we have evaluated to be in this situation," Lund explains. Suzuki Motor Corp. in November said it would stop selling cars in the United States.

Offline Vanstar

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
  • Carma: +39/-228
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Acura TL
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2012, 01:45:00 pm »
The article is now complete............ ;D

Toyota falls short

Shoppers looking for a midprice family car will recognize some perennial bestsellers on the TOP
SAFETY PICK+ winners' list, including the Accord, Altima and Fusion.

One nameplate they won't find is Toyota. The Camry, which is the top-selling midsize car in the United States, and the Prius v, a 4-door hybrid wagon, earn poor ratings for small overlap protection and are the worst performers of the midsize group. The Camry was redesigned for 2012, and the Prius v was an all-new model for 2012.

The Camry and Prius v illustrate what can go wrong in a small overlap crash, despite good ratings in IIHS tests that qualify the cars for TOP SAFETY PICK.

Most modern cars have safety cages built to withstand head-on collisions and moderate overlap frontal crashes with little deformation, and the two Toyotas are no exception. Crush zones help manage crash energy to reduce forces on the occupant compartment. The main crush-zone structures are concentrated in the middle 50 percent of the front end. When a crash involves these structures, the occupant compartment is protected from intrusion, and front airbags and safety belts can effectively restrain and protect people inside.

For many vehicles, a 25 percent overlap frontal impact misses the primary structures designed to manage crash energy and results in crash forces going directly into the wheel, suspension system and firewall. Such crashes often have high levels of occupant compartment intrusion. It is not uncommon for the wheel to be forced rearward into the footwell, contributing to even more intrusion in the occupant compartment and resulting in serious leg and foot injuries. Since the impact occurs toward the car's outer edge, the vehicle has a tendency to rotate during the collision, resulting in the driver's head moving outboard, away from the frontal airbag. Real crashes of this type result in head injuries from contact with outboard structures or intruding objects such as trees or poles.

In the Camry, the force of the impact shoved the front wheel back into the footwell, bending the windshield pillar and pushing the parking brake pedal and the left outer edge of the instrument panel rearward into the driver's survival space. Likewise, there was significant intrusion in the Prius v, along with high forces on the dummy's legs and feet. The Prius v is the only car in the midsize test group to earn a poor rating for hip and thigh protection.

The Camry's driver airbag and side curtain airbag deployed, but the steering wheel moved so far to the right that the dummy's head made only minimal contact with the front airbag. The side curtain airbag didn't extend far enough forward to help prevent the dummy's head from hitting the instrument panel. In the Prius v, the side curtain airbag deployed too late in the crash to offer protection.

"Toyota engineers have a lot of work to do to match the performance of their competitors," Lund says.
 

Demanding crash

The small overlap frontal test represents a severe crash. When cars strike the test barrier they tend to move sideways away from it, and the interior structures including the driver door, side window and windshield pillar move in the same direction. The dummy, however, continues forward into the path of the sideways-moving interior structures. At the same time, the steering column and driver airbag move inboard in many vehicles as the front end and occupant compartment deform. If the dummy misses the airbag or slides off it, its head and chest are unprotected.

Front airbags are calibrated to deploy in these crashes. Side airbags, especially head-protecting curtains, don't always deploy because they are designed mainly for direct side impacts. When they do deploy, they don't always do so early enough or extend far enough forward to adequately protect people. The result is an airbag gray zone with gaps between what front airbags cover and what side airbags do — if they deploy at all.

Without airbag protection, people in real-world small overlap frontal crashes can sustain head injuries from direct contact with the windshield pillar, dashboard or window sill or by hitting trees, poles or other objects. Chest injuries happen when people contact the steering wheel, door or other intruding structures.

The Accord sedan shows how safety belts and airbags work together to provide exemplary protection. The dummy stayed engaged with the Accord's front airbag, and the steering wheel remained relatively stable because there was only moderate intrusion into the occupant compartment. That meant that the driver airbag was in the right position to cushion the dummy's head and chest. The side curtain airbag extended far enough forward to prevent the dummy's head from hitting interior components.

Every midsize car evaluated earns good ratings for head, neck and chest injury risk based on measurements from dummy sensors. Similar real-world crashes, however, often result in serious upper body injuries. One possible reason for the differing results is that real people move more during a crash and are prone to be out of position at the start, compared with relatively stiff and precisely positioned crash test dummies. Not all drivers are the same size as the dummy or seated the same way. A close call for the dummy could mean an actual injury for a person. Another reason is that the frontal crash dummy IIHS uses in the small overlap test isn't good at measuring risks from lateral forces. Side crash dummies do a better job of this but can't record much of the frontal action in these tests.

"The dummy doesn't always tell us everything," Lund says. "The crash damage in these tests is like the damage we see in real-world crashes where heads and chests are injured."

 

Unexpected outcomes

In the Jetta test, engineers at the Vehicle Research Center witnessed a first for IIHS crash testing when the driver airbag module detached from the steering column. It happened relatively late in the crash and didn't affect the dummy's movement. Still, airbags should stay in place in crashes, so engineers had to lower the restraints and kinematics score for the marginal-rated Jetta. IIHS isn't aware of a problem with Volkswagen's airbag module in real-world crashes, and Volkswagen is investigating further.

The Kizashi's results also are unique. The car, which Suzuki introduced in the 2010 model year, is the only midsize moderately priced car to earn a good rating for structure in the small overlap test. The Kizashi also earns good ratings in the moderate overlap frontal test, side test and seat/head restraint evaluation. Its roof strength rating, however, is acceptable, so it has never qualified for TOP SAFETY PICK.

"The Kizashi is a rare case. Its good small overlap test performance outweighs its acceptable rollover rating, so the car is a TOP SAFETY PICK+. So far this is the only model we have evaluated to be in this situation," Lund explains. Suzuki Motor Corp. in November said it would stop selling cars in the United States.

 :notroll:
I'd never join a group that would have me as a member.

Offline PJungnitsch

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 4298
  • Carma: +43/-43
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Travel in Africa
  • Cars: Pontiac Vibe, Evolve Pintail, Evolve Carbon, Yamaha TW200
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2012, 02:25:59 pm »
Jeez Greg/Catseye/Chamadarla whoever the hell you call yourself now, give it a rest already. We get it, you hate Toyota.

Offline Jaeger

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5973
  • Carma: +182/-546
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Hyundai Sonata 2.0T, 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2012, 02:51:44 pm »
Jeez Greg/Catseye/Chamadarla whoever the hell you call yourself now, give it a rest already. We get it, you hate Toyota.

+1,000,000

Online Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14990
  • Carma: +546/-722
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2012, 03:06:19 pm »
Jeez Greg/Catseye/Chamadarla whoever the hell you call yourself now, give it a rest already. We get it, you hate Toyota.
Jeez Greg/Catseye/Chamadarla whoever the hell you call yourself now, give it a rest already. We get it, you hate Toyota.

+1,000,000

+1,000,001
Keep the change you filthy animal.

Offline gord_boyd

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 250
  • Carma: +2/-21
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '12 A7, '85 911 turbo
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2012, 09:08:25 pm »
Aside from Toyota, it leaves me wondering what Audi; Mercedes; Honda-TSX are doing?

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18194
  • Carma: +97/-730
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobbie Car: 1990 944S2
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2012, 09:21:24 pm »
Jeez Greg/Catseye/Chamadarla whoever the hell you call yourself now, give it a rest already. We get it, you hate Toyota.

You can add "easyrider" to the list.  :)
“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.

Offline Vanstar

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
  • Carma: +39/-228
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Acura TL
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2012, 12:25:17 am »
Then stop feeding the trolls!

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33910
  • Carma: +520/-944
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2012, 09:29:08 am »
Then stop feeding the trolls!

I disagree, if we keep the pressure up the admin will eventually ban the account and we get a few months of peace as the IQ in this place goes up 100 points. :popo:

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 43642
  • Carma: +264/-270
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: since the beginning of Saf timeLOTUS ELAN,STANDARD... 10, MG midget, MGB (2),Mazda Millennia,Hyundai Veloster and 1997 Ford Ranger 2014 Subaru Forester XT
Re: IIHS Crowns 13 Top Safety Pick+ and 117 Top Safety Picks
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2012, 09:53:03 am »
....

  I once dated a girl called chamaridia
  Filled to the hilt with Chlamydia
  Her Toyota seats
  Were filled with yeasts
  And it was a bugger to get Ridehyah


...............
Time is to stop everything happening at once