Author Topic: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012  (Read 887 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3206
  • Carma: +50/-5
  • member
    • View Profile
Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« on: January 17, 2012, 03:02:52 am »


The Cayman 'is perhaps the consummate vehicle in which driver is truly connected to the machine.'

Read More...

Offline D70

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 366
  • Carma: +9/-137
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2012, 07:45:52 am »
Why mess with a good thing

Would love to drive this on a track.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/d70w7/5143660303/

Offline Flinter

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Ottawa, ON
  • Posts: 942
  • Carma: +17/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 128i, 1996 Corolla, 2007 Suzuki SX4
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2012, 09:50:41 am »
I'd love to get my hands on a Cayman for an extended test drive.

Quote
So what could the extra ten bills buy you? For starters, a larger powerplant shaving nearly seven seconds off the zero-to-100 km/h time (estimated at 5.1 seconds), larger wheels, bigger brakes and a six-speed manual gearbox, versus a five-speed, found in the 2.7-litre version of the Cayman.

I know that the Cayman S makes significantly more power than the base Cayman but I suspect there is an error in the article with regards to a ~7sec reduction in zero-to-100 km/h time. ;D

« Last Edit: January 17, 2012, 03:58:46 pm by Flinter »

Offline wing

  • Big Wig
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
  • Posts: 18105
  • Carma: +101/-61
  • Gender: Male
  • If you ain't first ... you're last!
    • View Profile
    • Drivesideways
  • Cars: 2001 Honda S2000; 2005 Nissan Titan
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 12:41:24 pm »
Yeah 7tenths of a second maybe.  That would put the Cayman at 12.1 seconds?  Slower than a smart car? LOL

Offline lebowski

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Location: montreal
  • Posts: 357
  • Carma: +3/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2012, 01:58:41 pm »
I’ve always liked the Cayman and its purity of purpose, but I don’t know if I’d have one over a Boxster, especially if it was going to be a secondary "fun" car.

Offline tortoise

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Ottawa
  • Posts: 2679
  • Carma: +7/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2012, 03:43:29 pm »
This article reads more like a buyer's guide than a modern classics article.  I think there was a single sentence dedicated to how it drives and nothing about why it should be considered a classic.  The rest was a list of options available over its lifespan.

Love the Cayman.  It's a shame that Porsche never unleashed its full potential for fear of making a more potent car than the 911.
Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21600
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2012, 03:51:12 pm »
This article reads more like a buyer's guide than a modern classics article.  I think there was a single sentence dedicated to how it drives and nothing about why it should be considered a classic.  The rest was a list of options available over its lifespan.

Love the Cayman.  It's a shame that Porsche never unleashed its full potential for fear of making a more potent car than the 911.

I agree, not a good effort considering the car that was being reviewed. Judging by the pictures was the Cayman even driven?

Offline aquadorhj

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Winter Wonderland
  • Posts: 1645
  • Carma: +53/-26
    • View Profile
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2012, 04:00:17 pm »
agreed that the article doesn't necessarily make a case for why the cayman should be considered a modern classic(though i think it is).

also agreed that it is pretty sparse when it comes to driving impression.  but there are loads of those around the net.  is it a requirement for the "modern classic" article?

personally, i would get a boxter(base, S, doesn't matter to me) before cayman.  just like the look of it more.  ;D

Driving thrills makes my wallet lighter.. and therefore makes me faster because i'm shedding weight... :D

Offline Gamefreak

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Edmonton, AB
  • Posts: 230
  • Carma: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 11 Hyundai Elantra GLS 6MT 4dr
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2012, 08:14:06 pm »
Other than the Cayman being a coupe and the Boxster being a convertible, what's the difference between them?

Offline lebowski

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Location: montreal
  • Posts: 357
  • Carma: +3/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Modern Classics: Porsche Cayman, 2006-2012
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2012, 10:29:24 am »
Other than the Cayman being a coupe and the Boxster being a convertible, what's the difference between them?

Nothing, as far as I can tell, except Caymans, when new, were always priced ~$5-10k higher than equivalently-specced Boxsters.