Author Topic: 2012 KTM Duke  (Read 1014 times)

Offline Wolverine

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Brazil
  • Posts: 1686
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2012 KTM Duke
« Reply #20 on: November 23, 2011, 07:37:52 pm »
Ubber-KOOL.

I'm waiting for the KTM 200cc here in Brazil. They said next year we should be seeing it in the streets. Just hope the price is right.

Talking about the 690 Duke, isn't 70HP a bit too low for this engine? Guess the ultra low weight will make it up anyway. KTM site says 67HP on this one btw.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2011, 07:40:25 pm by Wolverine »
"If you wanna make the world a better place take a look at yourself and make a change."

Offline rrocket

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: My house
  • Posts: 18665
  • Carma: +81/-89
    • View Profile
Re: 2012 KTM Duke
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2011, 08:10:15 pm »
^^The Duke...it's the highest performance single cylinder in the world.  No other single makes that kind of power...
« Last Edit: November 23, 2011, 08:13:13 pm by rrocket »
How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
  • Posts: 10333
  • Carma: +62/-80
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2012 KTM Duke
« Reply #22 on: November 23, 2011, 11:19:40 pm »
With only one ignition per four cycles, it's hard to make big power with a single cylinder engine.  Two strokes double that up, but still make more power with more cylinders.
No place I'd rather be...

Offline rrocket

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: My house
  • Posts: 18665
  • Carma: +81/-89
    • View Profile
Re: 2012 KTM Duke
« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2011, 11:30:30 pm »
The Duke pulled and felt like a twin....

Offline Wolverine

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Brazil
  • Posts: 1686
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2012 KTM Duke
« Reply #24 on: November 24, 2011, 06:30:27 pm »
Hadn't see that it was a single cylinder, makes sense now.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2011, 04:54:45 am by Wolverine »