"The Jeep AWD system is light years ahead of a Highlander. FWIW there is still plenty of late 80's and 90's Cherokees running around. The 4.0L straight six is durable. I see more of these compared to old 4Runners."
Agreed. Both 4Runners and Cherokees suffer from rust, however. Although the 1997+ Cherokees were a bit better. Further, although the interiors of the Cherokee were no hell, I think they are better than comparable models today (see Escape, Patriot, Liberty, Rav4)
I picked the Cherokee over the 4Runner and the Pathfinder back in the day because of the massive 4.0L engine. The relative small size of the Cherokee vs. the size of the engine meant it was a much better performer than its rivals. Actually, in the early 1990's the Cherokee was a bit of a "hotrod" with 190hp (Mustangs were pumping out 225ish). Fast forward to 2011, the Jeep Liberty is not a class leader in power but rather offers worst in class acceleration and fuel economy. Ditto on Patriot with Freedom Drive 2 (What's the point of having a 2wd Jeep?). How is it possible that a car designed in 1983 could offer more than its replacement in 2011? BOOOOO!
Chryco needs another hit like the Cherokee or 1st gen Liberty. Something that sells 200K+ units a year. I don't see enough market for the Grand Cherokee long term to sustain the brand.