Quote from: rrocket on August 15, 2010, 02:27:50 amQuote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 14, 2010, 12:53:19 amThe air intake protrudes through the hood, so it rocks or shakes as the engine revs. The theory goes that the outside air is cooler (more dense) than the air under the hood, so more fuel can be burned, and power produced. Much more gimmick than functional.I saw a dyno test in a Ford Magazine, and with the shaker blocked, the car made 10 RWHP and 15R WTQ less. And that was with just a strong fan blowing into it.Are we talking old carburetted version or a new fuel injected model? Was it sucking air from under to hood? From tests I've seen in the past, there wasn't any difference.
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 14, 2010, 12:53:19 amThe air intake protrudes through the hood, so it rocks or shakes as the engine revs. The theory goes that the outside air is cooler (more dense) than the air under the hood, so more fuel can be burned, and power produced. Much more gimmick than functional.I saw a dyno test in a Ford Magazine, and with the shaker blocked, the car made 10 RWHP and 15R WTQ less. And that was with just a strong fan blowing into it.
The air intake protrudes through the hood, so it rocks or shakes as the engine revs. The theory goes that the outside air is cooler (more dense) than the air under the hood, so more fuel can be burned, and power produced. Much more gimmick than functional.
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 15, 2010, 12:46:40 pmQuote from: rrocket on August 15, 2010, 02:27:50 amQuote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 14, 2010, 12:53:19 amThe air intake protrudes through the hood, so it rocks or shakes as the engine revs. The theory goes that the outside air is cooler (more dense) than the air under the hood, so more fuel can be burned, and power produced. Much more gimmick than functional.I saw a dyno test in a Ford Magazine, and with the shaker blocked, the car made 10 RWHP and 15R WTQ less. And that was with just a strong fan blowing into it.Are we talking old carburetted version or a new fuel injected model? Was it sucking air from under to hood? From tests I've seen in the past, there wasn't any difference.Both. Granted, you might not be able to feel a mere 10HP on the butt dyno. But every bit counts.
Great car!Does anyone else think that Mustangs (incl this one) should be a lot lower? Not just an inch, but maybe 2"? They look very tall.
This may not be Corolla or anything....but this Boss is hot-hot-hot! So now you get a TracKey...'TracKey,'...alters nearly 200 engine management parameters..."It's not for use on the street – for example, the deceleration is set up to preserve the brakes, and the throttle response is very aggressive. A skilled driver on a closed course will really appreciate the benefits." The TracKey also features a two-stage launch control...that can be controlled via buttons on the steering wheel.Skilled driver...huh...well leaves me out...but I could learn!http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/11/2012-mustang-boss-302-to-come-with-special-key-for-race-calibrat/
This may not be Corolla or anything....but this Boss is hot-hot-hot! So now you get a TracKey...'TracKey,'...alters nearly 200 engine management parameters..."It's not for use on the street – for example, the deceleration is set up to preserve the brakes, and the throttle response is very aggressive. A skilled driver on a closed course will really appreciate the benefits." The TracKey also features a two-stage launch control...that can be controlled via buttons on the steering wheel.
^^Wow..WTF? Better to get a GT500...or a base Stang and make it into a "Boss" of your choosing...