|
bzborow1
|
 |
« on: November 06, 2009, 02:47:28 pm » |
|
Hey Guys, I'm looking at a smaller crossover vehicle as my carrying needs have increased over the years. After doing a lot of research and a few small trips to look through both vehicles, I'm wondering what others have to say. I'm currently looking at the 2010 CR-V vs. Rav4. I recognize the v6 puts the Rav4 in an advantageous position, but what about the base models for each? They both have essentially the same HP but the CR-V has the 5-speed transmission to the Rav4's 4-speed. What are some of your thoughts on either of these vehicles?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Juke1
Drunk on Fuel
 OfflineVehicle: 2011 Nissan Juke SL AWD
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2052
member
 
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2009, 03:08:06 pm » |
|
Are these the only 2 in this category you are looking at? There are a lot of good choices here? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. - Dale Carnegie
Diversity is not about how we differ. Diversity is about embracing one another's uniqueness. -Ola Joseph
|
|
|
|
sirAQUAMAN64
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2009, 03:09:09 pm » |
|
Honda finally dropped the price on the CR-V, but I'd still go Forester. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airbalancer
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 03:26:43 pm » |
|
Equinox ables to be good value
But have not drive one |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mmorriso
Enthusiast
OfflineVehicle: 2002 Mazda Protege5, 2004 Toyota Sienna XLE
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 290
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2009, 03:37:26 pm » |
|
thorough test drives will answer many of your questions as many things come down to personal preference.
happy shopping! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
y2chuck
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 03:58:36 pm » |
|
out of those 2 options, CR-V for me. The ride in the RAV4 is a bit cushy and pillowy for my taste. As others said, there is a lot of great choice in this segment now. Equinox, Terrain, Sante Fe, Forester, new Tucson is due next year, Outlander....lots to choose from. What's your main criteria?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Current Cars: 2012 Mazda5 GS, 2011 Ford Fiesta SE Hackback
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 04:22:07 pm » |
|
I can't imagine shopping these two without giving both the Hyundai and the Sub at least serious consideration. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
johngenx
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2009, 06:08:00 pm » |
|
Well all know which one I'd choose. The Scoob AWD system alone is worth it, and the 09- Forester is now competitive in looks, finish and size. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No place I'd rather be...  |
|
|
|
Trainman
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2009, 08:12:32 pm » |
|
Well all know which one I'd choose. The Scoob AWD system alone is worth it, and the 09- Forester is now competitive in looks, finish and size.
 That's me. I cross shopped them all and ended up with the 09 Forester, my first Subaru. And after 37,000 kms, I am still very happy with my choice. The CR-V and RAV4 both dropped off my list rather early, due to price and their so called AWD systems. The Forester offered a lower price and a better system for my needs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2009 Subaru Forester X Touring Edition  |
|
|
|
|
|
jpd
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2010, 02:45:00 pm » |
|
Today, between the two, I would go for the CR-V!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Petzy
Learner's Permit
OfflineVehicle: Cadillac CTS
Gender:
Location: hamilton, ont
Posts: 100
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2010, 10:29:25 pm » |
|
Between the two the Rav4 has better acceleration..Especially when your foot is not on the pedal  CHEAP SHOT |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
johngenx
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2010, 10:34:41 pm » |
|
Between the two the Rav4 has better acceleration..Especially when your foot is not on the pedal CHEAP SHOT That's on the verge of cnting up this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No place I'd rather be...
|
|
|
|
