Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2010 Camaro SS vs 2009 Challenger R/T  (Read 3474 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2739

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: October 27, 2009, 06:54:20 am »

         
CanadianDriver's Made in Canada test drive series:
2010 Camaro SS vs 2009 Challenger R/T

2010 Camaro SS vs 2009 Challenger R/TThis week, CanadianDriver begins its new Made in Canada Test-drive series that compares vehicles built in Canada that compete in the same market segment.  We begin with the Oshawa, Ontario-built Chevrolet Camaro SS and the Brampton, Ontario-built Dodge Challenger R/T.
 More: View the photos | All the Features
Logged
TopGun
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 CooperS 03 Protege5 07 RX8
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 3492


I'd get a ZR-1...but the interior sucks.


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2009, 04:13:11 pm »

57 posts to date on the Nissan Cube...and none in here.   Undecided

Perhaps because these cars have already been posted to death in other threads.

Interesting to read that the Challenger came into it's own when it was considered for what it's mission is...a cruising car.

And as for the comment that these cars won't save Detroit because they're niche cars...wonder if they realize how much the Miata had to do with Mazda's return to building great cars...despite the fact it was also a nice car.
Logged

If it flies, floats or f#%&s...rent it.
ovr50
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 18417


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2009, 04:24:38 pm »

Well, as to niche vehicles, they may not save the companies, but they do help bring traffic into the showrooms. I would think that both GM and Chryco would be happy to have any traffic in their showrooms these days..!! Also, remember the forebearers of these two cars were not mainstream vehicles back in the 60s either, they were the "icing on the cake" that got ppl interested in other, lesser, more utilitarian products.

Unfortunately for both GM and Chry, the Mustang came out in 2004, as a 2005 MY, and sold well. Even 5 years ago, there was less focus on "green", fuel economy, and being "socially responsible" than there is today.

A few old geezers my age will buy them, after that, IMO these will be a tougher sell going forward.

Of the two, my preference would be the Camaro, notwithstanding it's spacey-looking interior.  Wink

Logged

2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport
and
2005 Toyota Highlander in Indigo Ink
Rupert
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 981

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2009, 09:21:22 am »

I can't imagine that car companies produce vehicles as loss leaders just to get people in the door. Like some store selling groceries except the customer does not go out with the featured product, they only come to look at it. If these types pull people into the showroom...how can they go out with a high quality sub-compact or such? However, a high quality, great handling, gas saving compact might well draw people to a sub-compact model similarly endowed...or even to the leader itself.
Perhaps we live in a time where utility and substance takes prefference over style and that this does not have to be at the expense of desireability and gratification. This is the challenge that has to be addressed IMO.
It's not that the product here does not have merit; it does...but only to look at for me.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 09:34:55 am by Rupert » Logged
tpl
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: VW GTI, Honda Fit
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph On.
Posts: 13963



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2009, 09:30:35 am »

Well, as to niche vehicles, they may not save the companies, but they do help bring traffic into the showrooms. I would think that both GM and Chryco would be happy to have any traffic in their showrooms these days..!! Also, remember the forebearers of these two cars were not mainstream vehicles back in the 60s either, they were the "icing on the cake" that got ppl interested in other, lesser, more utilitarian products.

Unfortunately for both GM and Chry, the Mustang came out in 2004, as a 2005 MY, and sold well. Even 5 years ago, there was less focus on "green", fuel economy, and being "socially responsible" than there is today.

A few old geezers my age will buy them, after that, IMO these will be a tougher sell going forward.

Of the two, my preference would be the Camaro, notwithstanding it's spacey-looking interior.  Wink



Problem is that Chryco and to some extent GM, don't have anything in the showrooms worth looking at. 

Logged

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.
Lord Palmerston
Rupert
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 981

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2009, 09:41:36 am »

Chrysler do have at least one vehicle worth looking at and it has been, and is, the world leader in it's class. That is the Caravan/Town And Country. You can not go far on the road without seeing several. Not a car but if they can do it in this segement surely they can also perform the same job on other vehicles.
Logged
Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2009, 09:50:45 am »

I know that the "proper" response is the Camaro, but both my heart and brain go with the Challenger R/T 6MT.  Heart because I love the look and sound.  I've always thought that the Camaro was a little overdone, a little cartoony.  Brain because the Challenger has a far more useable back seat and trunk.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
Winklovic
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Chrysler Sebring LX, 17.86@77.61 mph
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 2789



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2009, 01:04:08 pm »

both my heart and brain go with the Challenger R/T 6MT. 

+1

Logged

Giant Dwarf
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 BMW 335i, '10 Mazda6 GT
Gender: Male
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 10223



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2009, 03:57:10 pm »

Ovr, I was always one to say the same thing about 'niche cars'.  "Well, they bring people into the showrooms."  But in pondering it here, I'm not so sure any more. 

I love that GM has brought out a new Camaro.  I'm dying to drive one to feel the thrust of that big V8 and hear its rumble -- and I think they're cool looking (again, crap interior notwithstanding).  But, I have no desire to go out of my way into a Chevy dealer just to look at one.  Between auto shows, really good websites both from the media and the manufacturer equipped with video or high res images, you can get darn near the same experience you'd get by seeing the car in the showroom -- if not better (avoiding the hassle of salespeople and being able to see the car in the colour you'd dream of). 

If someone is legitimately interested in a modern pony car, is their appetite for a snorting V8 Camaro really going to be satisfied by a Malibu?

***

Also, to Wing:  WTF?


* wtf.jpg (110.19 KB, 700x331 - viewed 53 times.)
Logged
chrischasescars
WingMan
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Whatever they're paying me to drive this week
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 929


Automotive journalism ninja


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2009, 04:59:56 pm »

GD: The title's actually my fault. Wrong alt code behind one of the photos. Ooops.
Logged

Buy this car to drive to work; Drive to work to pay for this car.
I write stuff here: ThisIsWhatIThinkOfYourCar.com
I sing stuff here: ChrisChasesCars.bandcamp.com/
Erik
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 300C
Location: Torana
Posts: 3128



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2009, 08:49:31 pm »

I seriously doubt that either GM or Chrysler are losing money on either. All existing, paid for machinery under the skin.The Challenger SRT8 I drove, priced out, drooled at and thought very seriously about was a $50K car! Gulp! Doubt they were losing money off of that one.
Logged

"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." - Sir William Lyons
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2009, 09:00:02 pm »

I seriously doubt that either GM or Chrysler are losing money on either. All existing, paid for machinery under the skin.The Challenger SRT8 I drove, priced out, drooled at and thought very seriously about was a $50K car! Gulp! Doubt they were losing money off of that one.

Are they still gouging/marking up the SRT8??
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2009, 09:18:17 pm »

Ovr, I was always one to say the same thing about 'niche cars'.  "Well, they bring people into the showrooms."  But in pondering it here, I'm not so sure any more. 

I love that GM has brought out a new Camaro.  I'm dying to drive one to feel the thrust of that big V8 and hear its rumble -- and I think they're cool looking (again, crap interior notwithstanding).  But, I have no desire to go out of my way into a Chevy dealer just to look at one.  Between auto shows, really good websites both from the media and the manufacturer equipped with video or high res images, you can get darn near the same experience you'd get by seeing the car in the showroom -- if not better (avoiding the hassle of salespeople and being able to see the car in the colour you'd dream of). 

If someone is legitimately interested in a modern pony car, is their appetite for a snorting V8 Camaro really going to be satisfied by a Malibu?

***

Also, to Wing:  WTF?


Plus you don't have to speak to people who live in fantasyland where 13.9% finance is all that's available and that the base Challenger will be a classic collectable so no budging on price... muppets....
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2009, 10:11:22 pm »

I wouldn't be surprised if the Challenger has significantly boosted sales of the Charger and 300, which were starting to get long in the tooth.  People come in because the Challenger is just so cool, but once they're in and their significant other is starting to question the purchase, the salesman points out that the Charger drives similarly, is a lot more practical, and probably is cheaper.

Plus, there's something to be said for just improving brand perception.  Look at Lexus and the LFA.  It's not like people are going to a Lexus dealership intending on getting an LFA but end up driving out in an IS350...but the existence of such models just improves overall brand prestige, which increases demand, which increases the price at which those dealerships are able to sell every model they sell.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2009, 10:16:28 pm »

I wouldn't be surprised if the Challenger has significantly boosted sales of the Charger and 300, which were starting to get long in the tooth.  People come in because the Challenger is just so cool, but once they're in and their significant other is starting to question the purchase, the salesman points out that the Charger drives similarly, is a lot more practical, and probably is cheaper.

Plus, there's something to be said for just improving brand perception.  Look at Lexus and the LFA.  It's not like people are going to a Lexus dealership intending on getting an LFA but end up driving out in an IS350...but the existence of such models just improves overall brand prestige, which increases demand, which increases the price at which those dealerships are able to sell every model they sell.

I don't know if I agree with that.  I'm not sure it will increase prestige..but it may increase brand awareness in that Lexus make more than just uber-luxury cars.

Certainly if you are a car nut you'd know that Toyota is capable of building such a car from their F1 experience.  But for the non-car nut, I don't know if people will care about the LF-A either way.
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2009, 10:25:49 pm »

The camaro SS is quite the bargain you get a vette motor in a slightly heavier chassis with a sophisticated suspension for $35k starting price?  BARGOON!

Too bad about the interior!
Logged


rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2009, 10:32:04 pm »

The camaro SS is quite the bargain you get a vette motor in a slightly heavier chassis with a sophisticated suspension for $35k starting price?  BARGOON!

Too bad about the interior!

Hmmm..GM shows $37K on their site.  Are they discounting already?  Even at $37K, I have yet to see one for that. All the local ones are more or less loaded up.  I have not seen one for any less than low/nearly mid $40s.

I did see one today on the lot.  It was white, and had an interesting goldish sticker trim around the front fenders.  Looked not too bad at all.  Not sure if this is a GM package or some aftermarket thing?
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Giant Dwarf
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 BMW 335i, '10 Mazda6 GT
Gender: Male
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 10223



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2009, 12:40:41 am »


Plus you don't have to speak to people who live in fantasyland where 13.9% finance is all that's available and that the base Challenger will be a classic collectable so no budging on price... muppets....

You can get a 2010 'Stang with 0% for 60 months last I checked (maybe that deal is done now?)  Wink

Mitlov, you make a good point about the Challenger possibly contributing to Charger sales.  That I could see happening.

As Rrocket said though, I'm not sure how much halo affect the LF-A will have on the general public.  Most people will never even get to see one (just as well... weird lookin' thing anyway), and unless you're a real car-nut, you wouldn't have an appreciation for it.  Not sure it'd have any more cache to the common joe than an Infiniti G37 or an RX8 except that they'll be less common.
Logged
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2009, 06:51:22 am »

Maybe you can now, but having dealt with this these idiots twice now I don't think I'll ever go back.
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

No H2O
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1999 Honda CR-V, 1995 Porsche Carrera
Gender: Male
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 2284


Alps Adventurer


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2009, 10:48:03 pm »

Problem is that Chryco and to some extent GM, don't have anything in the showrooms worth looking at.

My thoughts exactly!

I haven't bothered going to either site, but if they're going for what others have posted on this thread, OMG, there are far better cars out there for the coin.

Logged

What you won't find in my car is a coffee, cigarette and a cell phone. What you will find is a driver; imagine that, a driver in a vehicle. What an effing concept!

A car has to do more than just perform; it has to stir your soul!

A true driver's car does not have cup holders.
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 39 queries.