Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CR Winter Tire Test Results  (Read 7111 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2009, 01:12:07 pm »

..i only accept Wesley Sipes................on ma ride.....................cool fool................


   The missing "ingredient" in all these tyre tests is the NUT BEHIND THE WHEEL...............a half  decent driver can get going in WINTER.......an eedjit couldn't get going in SUMMER..........
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
sailor723
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 11 ML350 Bluetec and 11 BMW 328i xDrive
Gender: Male
Location: NB
Posts: 3374


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: October 08, 2009, 03:27:59 pm »

In terms of "bang for the buck" it looks like the Generals to me. They really seem to be on a role lately.
Logged

My first ever GM ownership experience  can best be described as   "Fool me once...."
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: October 08, 2009, 05:43:00 pm »

wot "role" is that.....impersonating an OFFICER...................or a round rubber wheel........... Tongue
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
davidy
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Ford Ranger FX4;1996 Mazda B3000
Gender: Male
Location: BC interior
Posts: 587



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2009, 09:01:20 pm »

Ok....something is seriously wrong here.  I just checked the prices for the General's at Canadian Tire and unless I am mistaken,  the price has jumped over $30, depending on the tire size.  

Awhile ago, CT had a 25% off sale on the General Altimax Arctics....great deals if they have your size. $10-$15 off per tire nowadays is not that great.

Dave
Logged

2010 Ford Ranger FX4
Armaguard spray on liner
Truxedo Low Pro QT tonneau cover
Studded General Altimax Arctic P245/75-16 winter tires on black steelies
Denky
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Toronto , On
Posts: 17


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: October 16, 2009, 10:26:38 pm »

can some explain the Legend.
What does all these Circles and 1/2 circles mean?
are the prices in US or CAD?
« Last Edit: October 16, 2009, 10:29:30 pm by Denky » Logged
HeliDriver
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 GTI, 2007 Suburban
Location: AB
Posts: 2626



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: October 16, 2009, 10:39:12 pm »

Prices would be in $U.S.

Just going from memory here, but the circles mean something like this:

Full circle (red) =  Excellent
Half circle (red) = Very Good
Blank circle =  Good
Half circle (black) = Fair
Full circle (black) = Poor
Logged
Marauderman
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 04 Mercury Marauder
Gender: Male
Location: Ont
Posts: 11



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2009, 09:36:57 pm »

Interesting how the top three picks have the worst dry road braking.  I've had to hit the brakes full more than once doing over 120km/hr in normal highway traffic.
Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2009, 10:29:21 pm »

Interesting how the top three picks have the worst dry road braking.  I've had to hit the brakes full more than once doing over 120km/hr in normal highway traffic.

Yea...but NONE of the tires have great dry braking.....It's splitting hairs, really.
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
X-Traction
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 496

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: October 19, 2009, 10:37:33 pm »

A check of the specs on tirerack shows that the Blizzak WS60 comes with about 10% deeper tread than the X-ice Xi2 to which it was compared.

All else being equal this would help explain why the WS60 is rated as having less cornering stability, dry traction, steering response and noise comfort.  Similarly it helps explain the WS60's better traction in snow and on ice.

Presumably ride comfort, where the Xi2 is better, is a function of carcass construction.  It would appear from "treadwear" that the Xi2 outlasts the WS60 despite the latter's deeper tread.  Of course, tread compound and tread pattern (they are very similar) are other factors that affect the ratings.

The WS60 rates substantially better than the Xi2 on the question if people would buy them again.  That and the better performance in snow and ice wuould make it an easy choice for more severe winter use.
Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: October 19, 2009, 10:46:29 pm »

I had the previous version of the WS60, and found that it wore out far too quickly.  One of the upside of the Xice2 is that it is supposed to wear much longer.  From our use so far, I'd have to agree.
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
davidy
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Ford Ranger FX4;1996 Mazda B3000
Gender: Male
Location: BC interior
Posts: 587



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2009, 01:18:57 am »

I had the previous version of the WS60, and found that it wore out far too quickly.  One of the upside of the Xice2 is that it is supposed to wear much longer.  From our use so far, I'd have to agree.

Someone at a different forum noted that the tread depth on the X-Ice2 are NOT that deep (10/32 inches if I recall correctly). Other winter tires are typically deeper at either 11/32" or 12/32". Hope that they do wear well.

Dave
Logged

2010 Ford Ranger FX4
Armaguard spray on liner
Truxedo Low Pro QT tonneau cover
Studded General Altimax Arctic P245/75-16 winter tires on black steelies
johngenx
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Toyota Corolla 2001 Subaru Forester 2001 Suzuki Hayabusa
Gender: Male
Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
Posts: 9879



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2009, 08:32:07 am »

Bridgestone's Revo was short on tread depth and wore fast.  The WS-60 returns to the deeper tread of the WS-50, but is a much better tire.  (We have both)

When we bought our WS-60's, they were priced much lower than the Michelin, but that seems to have changed, and not for the better.
Logged

No place I'd rather be...
Andy@1010tires
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 77



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2009, 12:32:53 pm »

Bridgestone's Revo was short on tread depth and wore fast.  The WS-60 returns to the deeper tread of the WS-50, but is a much better tire.  (We have both)

When we bought our WS-60's, they were priced much lower than the Michelin, but that seems to have changed, and not for the better.

Strange that you don't like them. The Blizak WS60 as been in our top 2 selling snow tires for the last 2 years now.
Logged

Andy
AI@1010tires.com
Canada's Largest Online Tire & Wheel Retailer

ktm525
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Honda Ridgeline / Land Rover LR3 / Volvo P1800E
Location: against the eastern side of the rocks
Posts: 4862


Just walk away!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: October 20, 2009, 01:12:32 pm »

Bridgestone's Revo was short on tread depth and wore fast.  The WS-60 returns to the deeper tread of the WS-50, but is a much better tire.  (We have both)

When we bought our WS-60's, they were priced much lower than the Michelin, but that seems to have changed, and not for the better.

Strange that you don't like them. The Blizak WS60 as been in our top 2 selling snow tires for the last 2 years now.

Johnny was refering to the new price of the Blizzacks.
Logged
johngenx
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Toyota Corolla 2001 Subaru Forester 2001 Suzuki Hayabusa
Gender: Male
Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
Posts: 9879



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2009, 08:48:33 pm »

Strange that you don't like them. The Blizak WS60 as been in our top 2 selling snow tires for the last 2 years now.

Excellent tire, but I was not too impressed with the rapid price increases not too long after introduction.
Logged

No place I'd rather be...
X-Traction
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 496

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #35 on: October 20, 2009, 11:48:06 pm »

Tread depth on the tires I checked varied depending on the tire size.  This could cause confusion in comparisons.  The Blizzak DMZ-3's I bought last year came with 14/32 tread depth.  This makes them weigh more and affects steering response.  But I ain't a race car driver.  It also means they have substantially more tread to wear off before they're down to being relatively useless as snow tires.

A holy grail of snow tire compound technology is to become harder at higher temperatures, not softer. This would provide the snow and ice traction while prolonging tread life, thereby allowing shallower tread, which in turn preserves handling, makes them quieter, and they're lighter..etc.

My understanding is that the X-Ice Xi2 is the first or most advanced tire in this respect.  If true, this would explain their relatively shallow tread depth.  But they may just be more of a compromise than the Blizzaks, which are rated as better in snow and on ice.

As for the DMZ-3's, I expect to put less than 5000km per year on them, and much of that on wet pavement.  I also have vowed to take corners on dry pavement more slowly with them mounted.  Probably this is the primary way people wear out their snow tires.
Logged
ktm525
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Honda Ridgeline / Land Rover LR3 / Volvo P1800E
Location: against the eastern side of the rocks
Posts: 4862


Just walk away!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #36 on: October 21, 2009, 11:13:32 am »

Good points. I recently bought some General Arctic Altimax P245/75-16. The LT version of this tire had an extra 3/32 tread depth but were $50 more exspensive. Hmmm I am thinking I should have went with the LTs....
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 39 queries.