Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CR Winter Tire Test Results  (Read 7109 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Trainman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Subaru Forester 2004 Toyota Sienna
Gender: Male
Location: Darwin’s Waiting Room
Posts: 5553


Newb


View Profile
 Stats
« on: October 07, 2009, 08:08:28 pm »

Let the debate begin!



Logged

2009 Subaru Forester X Touring Edition

blur911
Drunk on Fuel
****
Online Online

Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 2237


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2009, 08:23:30 pm »

I wonder why they tested the previous generation of Dunlop Graspic DS-2?

 I just bought a set of Graspic DS-3 for our Outback VDC which are the new generation from Dunlop and are supposed to address the lower scores of the DS-2 in the dry/wet handling and braking departments.  Haven't installed them yet to see how they fare.
Logged
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14916



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2009, 08:27:41 pm »

Are Graspic DS-3 made by Goodyear?
Logged
blur911
Drunk on Fuel
****
Online Online

Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 2237


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2009, 08:47:31 pm »

Are Graspic DS-3 made by Goodyear?

The one's I got are made in Japan, specifically: 
EU --> SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES, LIMITED --> TOYOTA --> AICHI PREFECTURE --> JAPAN

EU is the first 2 digits in the serial.
Logged
HeliDriver
Drunk on Fuel
****
Online Online

Vehicle: 2010 GTI, 2007 Suburban
Location: AB
Posts: 2626



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2009, 08:49:15 pm »

I wonder why they tested the previous generation of Dunlop Graspic DS-2?

When was the DS-3 introduced?

I'm pretty sure CR makes a point of buying all their test items off the shelf, and not accepting anything direct from the manufacturers. I also assume that their tire testing for the current issue would have been done last winter, so that means they would only have had access to last year's tires.

Logged
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2009, 08:59:10 pm »

Anybody care to explain how they come up with their scores? The number is meaningless without how they got there.

What I want to see how is long it takes to stop/start on specific surfaces.
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
blur911
Drunk on Fuel
****
Online Online

Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 2237


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2009, 09:00:14 pm »

I wonder why they tested the previous generation of Dunlop Graspic DS-2?

When was the DS-3 introduced?

I'm pretty sure CR makes a point of buying all their test items off the shelf, and not accepting anything direct from the manufacturers. I also assume that their tire testing for the current issue would have been done last winter, so that means they would only have had access to last year's tires.

Good point, they were only introduced this year.  
Wonder why they results are only coming out now?  Anyhow, I'll see how they are in a few months.
Logged
Noobee
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3
Location: Here and there
Posts: 101


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2009, 09:28:44 pm »

Anybody care to explain how they come up with their scores? The number is meaningless without how they got there.

What I want to see how is long it takes to stop/start on specific surfaces.
+1.  Where were the tests done too? Montreal? Calgary, Colorado, etc.
Logged
ovr50
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 18417


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2009, 09:41:46 pm »

I find some of CRs tests and reports frustrating because, in the case of winter tires, there are "winter tires" and then there are "performance winter tires". Also, there are several different winter tires within each brand, eg. I am getting the Blizzaks LM-60s for the BMW, but the CR report only lists the WS60s.

On my previous car, had the Dunlop WinterSports 3Ms, which were a performance winter, and I found them quite good. They are not listed in the test, only the Graspic DS-2s (which, I think, are older?).

Anyway, avoid the Hankooks...!!!  Wink And treat the CR info as just another piece of the puzzle, not the be-all and end-all.
Logged

2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport
and
2005 Toyota Highlander in Indigo Ink
overtakeyouintheleftlane
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2003 Pontiac Grand AM (8000K projector hi/low HID, tint, Clarion deck with AUX/USB)
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 559

Public servant... and I'm NOT at your service


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2009, 09:56:04 pm »

My mechanic sells Dunlop tires.

DS-3's came out this year. According to my mechanic, he said the new DS-3's are superior to the DS-2's as between the sipes, when it makes contact with the ground they open up and there are sipes inside (sipes inside the sipes?)

He confirmed that Goodyear owns Dunlop just like Michelin owns BF Goodrich. (which is why he doesn't charge me for rotations or changeovers to winter tires as my all-seasons are Goodyear Assurance Tripletread).


« Last Edit: October 07, 2009, 10:02:27 pm by overtakeyouintheleftlane » Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2009, 10:11:37 pm »

I find some of CRs tests and reports frustrating because, in the case of winter tires, there are "winter tires" and then there are "performance winter tires". Also, there are several different winter tires within each brand, eg. I am getting the Blizzaks LM-60s for the BMW, but the CR report only lists the WS60s.

On my previous car, had the Dunlop WinterSports 3Ms, which were a performance winter, and I found them quite good. They are not listed in the test, only the Graspic DS-2s (which, I think, are older?).

Anyway, avoid the Hankooks...!!!  Wink And treat the CR info as just another piece of the puzzle, not the be-all and end-all.

I would avoid any LM series as a winter tire choice.  We've tried 3 different ones, and they were all horrible...only slightly better than an All-Season tire.  I've read tests that confirm this...(maybe at TireRack?)
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
blur911
Drunk on Fuel
****
Online Online

Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 2237


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2009, 10:24:28 pm »


He confirmed that Goodyear owns Dunlop just like Michelin owns BF Goodrich. (which is why he doesn't charge me for rotations or changeovers to winter tires as my all-seasons are Goodyear Assurance Tripletread).


Goodyear bought 75% of the North American and European part of Dunlop from Sumitomo.  Sumitomo still owns most of the Dunlop name in Japan.  The DS-3 tires I bought were made in a Sumitomo plant in Japan.
Doesn't really matter, just a point of interest.

BTW, we also have the Tripletred and are quite happy with them, they are a well built tire.
Logged
TheMAN
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 247


REZPEKT


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2009, 10:50:28 pm »

I find some of CRs tests and reports frustrating because, in the case of winter tires, there are "winter tires" and then there are "performance winter tires". Also, there are several different winter tires within each brand, eg. I am getting the Blizzaks LM-60s for the BMW, but the CR report only lists the WS60s.

On my previous car, had the Dunlop WinterSports 3Ms, which were a performance winter, and I found them quite good. They are not listed in the test, only the Graspic DS-2s (which, I think, are older?).

Anyway, avoid the Hankooks...!!!  Wink And treat the CR info as just another piece of the puzzle, not the be-all and end-all.

I would avoid any LM series as a winter tire choice.  We've tried 3 different ones, and they were all horrible...only slightly better than an All-Season tire.  I've read tests that confirm this...(maybe at TireRack?)

Tire Rack rates the LM25 6th overal out 0f 14, and 8.9 out of 10 customers would Buy Again. As compared to only 8.2 would "buy again", the top rated Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3.
Survey is here http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=W&VT=C
Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2009, 11:06:51 pm »

I find some of CRs tests and reports frustrating because, in the case of winter tires, there are "winter tires" and then there are "performance winter tires". Also, there are several different winter tires within each brand, eg. I am getting the Blizzaks LM-60s for the BMW, but the CR report only lists the WS60s.

On my previous car, had the Dunlop WinterSports 3Ms, which were a performance winter, and I found them quite good. They are not listed in the test, only the Graspic DS-2s (which, I think, are older?).

Anyway, avoid the Hankooks...!!!  Wink And treat the CR info as just another piece of the puzzle, not the be-all and end-all.

I would avoid any LM series as a winter tire choice.  We've tried 3 different ones, and they were all horrible...only slightly better than an All-Season tire.  I've read tests that confirm this...(maybe at TireRack?)

Tire Rack rates the LM25 6th overal out 0f 14, and 8.9 out of 10 customers would Buy Again. As compared to only 8.2 would "buy again", the top rated Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3.
Survey is here http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=W&VT=C

I tested the LM23, LM25 and the Xice2 back-to-back-to-back.  Xice2, hands down.  And it even felt as "sporty" as the LMs in the dry.
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Trainman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Subaru Forester 2004 Toyota Sienna
Gender: Male
Location: Darwin’s Waiting Room
Posts: 5553


Newb


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2009, 11:09:19 pm »

....

Anyway, avoid the Hankooks...!!!  Wink And treat the CR info as just another piece of the puzzle, not the be-all and end-all.

Exactly, just another tool.

And as for Hankooks, I actually agree.  The 401's we had on the van just turned real awful last winter despite the amount of tread still left on them.  Should have used them as the summer tires  Cheesy  And the LT tires on the Pathfinder were not that great either.
Logged

2009 Subaru Forester X Touring Edition

rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2009, 11:14:34 pm »

^^I had the I-Pikes.  They were just "OK".  But I paid only $25 ea. for them...
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Noobee
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3
Location: Here and there
Posts: 101


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2009, 01:23:06 am »

Ok....something is seriously wrong here.  I just checked the prices for the General's at Canadian Tire and unless I am mistaken,  the price has jumped over $30, depending on the tire size.  
« Last Edit: October 08, 2009, 01:50:47 am by Noobee » Logged
KRS
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Camaro, 2009 Sierra
Location: S.W Ont.
Posts: 361


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #17 on: October 08, 2009, 01:27:46 am »

Tire Rack rates the LM25 6th overal out 0f 14, and 8.9 out of 10 customers would Buy Again. As compared to only 8.2 would "buy again", the top rated Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3.
Survey is here http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=W&VT=C

  The Tire referenced in the CR report is the Primacy Alpin PA3 which Tire Rack doesn't include in their survey and not the Pilot Alpin PA3,s  which Tire Rack does have in their survey. As neither of the tires you refer to are covered by the CR test originally mentioned it maybe deserves its on thread.
Logged

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.<br />        H. L. Mencken<br />      (1880 - 1956)
mmorriso
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Mazda Protege5, 2004 Toyota Sienna XLE
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 292



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #18 on: October 08, 2009, 10:35:32 am »

another opinion:

http://www.wheels.ca/article/782202

http://www.wheels.ca/article/782238
Logged
ktm525
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Honda Ridgeline / Land Rover LR3 / Volvo P1800E
Location: against the eastern side of the rocks
Posts: 4862


Just walk away!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #19 on: October 08, 2009, 11:33:09 am »

No love for the Hankook Icebear. It's good that this will be their last winter on the Volvo. I did notice some deteriation in the grip at the end of last year. At 8/32"s. Honestly they aren't as bad as CR makes out. Last year they rated the same model a red circle for ice traction. Now it is a white circle?

Anyhow my new set looks like it will be the Continental Winter extremes.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 41 queries.