Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTC Review: 2010 Kia Forte Koup  (Read 9927 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #60 on: October 13, 2009, 10:34:20 pm »

I hope I never have to hear about this car again. Its a KIA people!

Here is what I suggest. Find the cord that goes from the back of your computer to the electricity jack in the wall and pull it. This should solve all your problems.
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #61 on: October 13, 2009, 10:41:02 pm »

I hope I never have to hear about this car again. Its a KIA people!

Here is what I suggest. Find the cord that goes from the back of your computer to the electricity jack in the wall and pull it. This should solve all your problems.

Oh...I thought you were going to tell him to chew on the cord.....while sitting in his bath tub....
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Brigitte
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Jetta GLS 2.Slow, 5-Speed
Gender: Female
Location: Of What?
Posts: 8370


Class Clown, Moderatrix and Resident Hag


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #62 on: October 13, 2009, 11:24:32 pm »

I would average 14L/100km in an Odyssey
From EPA rating 14.7 city 10.2 hwy
So you would drive an Odyssey with an egg under the gas pedal ROFL

Or a floor mat.   Grin
Logged
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #63 on: October 14, 2009, 06:35:39 am »

I hope I never have to hear about this car again. Its a KIA people!

Here is what I suggest. Find the cord that goes from the back of your computer to the electricity jack in the wall and pull it. This should solve all your problems.

Oh...I thought you were going to tell him to chew on the cord.....while sitting in his bath tub....

Actually, that is a better idea.
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
Snowdog
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 159


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #64 on: October 14, 2009, 08:08:59 am »

Just a quick update on the gas mileage I averaged 7.5 from Ottawa to Montreal at 120

Actually at 120 km/h that seems quite decent.  Probably helped by the relaxed highway gearing. That is also my normal highway cruising speed.

I think this will be a fine drivetrain once they reprogram the drive by wire throttle (assuming it is).

I am looking for a new hatchback in the next year or so. Fix the throttle and do a decent job on the Hatch and this Kia will be high on my list.
Logged
Canada Stig
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 131


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #65 on: October 14, 2009, 09:15:12 am »

Whoa, my comparison of a Mazda 3 and Kia Forte touched off some anger.

Power is not just measured in Bhp - it is how the car responds.  I am willing to give Kia and Hyundai a chance, believe me - anything that wakes Honda up to the needs of consumers is good - but I drove a "170hp" Forte last week as well as a "less powerful" Mazda 3 and an even less powerful 2010 Civic.  Sorry, no comparison.  The 3 (and the Civic, for that matter) and Forte are not even in the same league.  The Kia is a cheap car that will be bought by budget conscious drivers, not driving enthusiasts.  That is fine with me, but call it what it is.

My comment about fuel mileage is exactly that - driving the heck out of my 04 Civic Si, I never, ever average fuel economy worse than 8.5/100km, and that is even winding the snot out of it - all the way to 6500rpm btw shifts - to enjoy the VTEC power.  Highway mileage the last time I took it from Toronto to Ottawa was just under 40mpg - about 7l/100km.
Logged
2hondas1BMW
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '04 Acura TSX
Gender: Male
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3016


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #66 on: October 14, 2009, 10:47:53 am »

CR hasn't tested the Forte yet

I wonder if they will deem it "NOT ACCEPTABLE" for the stalling problem? Surely that is a real safety issue... and they haven't been able to feature that on a cover for 30 years or so.

They did on the Isuzu Trooper, because it tipped over in handling tests.

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/date/19960821/news01559.html
Logged

Mine: 2004 Acura TSX
Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i
leaverfast
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #67 on: October 14, 2009, 01:05:07 pm »

Power is not just measured in Bhp - it is how the car responds.  I am willing to give Kia and Hyundai a chance, believe me - anything that wakes Honda up to the needs of consumers is good - but I drove a "170hp" Forte last week as well as a "less powerful" Mazda 3 and an even less powerful 2010 Civic.  Sorry, no comparison.  The 3 (and the Civic, for that matter) and Forte are not even in the same league.  The Kia is a cheap car that will be bought by budget conscious drivers, not driving enthusiasts.  That is fine with me, but call it what it is.

What an insulting (or should say, ignorant) comment. It sounds suspicious that you actually "drove" the Koup. It is a real looker for sure.
Nevertheless, real driving enthusiasts would not drive a mundane fwd civic "SI", lol. You must be budget conscious as well because you could not afford a 350z or G35, etc. What a nonsense.
Logged
DKaz
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 07 Mazda 5 GT 5MT
Gender: Male
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 879



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #68 on: October 14, 2009, 03:38:18 pm »

Average 9.8L/100km? That's horrible. My 2007 Mazda 5 (MT) averages 9.1L/100km in day to day driving. It never gets worse than 10L in the city and can be as good as 7.5 on the highway (06 and 07 5s were rated 8.0/10.6 hwy/city, the 08 to 10 is even better at 7.1/9.6) And I can still do 0-60 in under 10 seconds. I'll stick with my sporty people mover thanks.
Logged

Current obsession: 2012 VW Passat TDI 6 speed manual
2hondas1BMW
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '04 Acura TSX
Gender: Male
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3016


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #69 on: October 14, 2009, 03:48:19 pm »

Power is not just measured in Bhp - it is how the car responds.  I am willing to give Kia and Hyundai a chance, believe me - anything that wakes Honda up to the needs of consumers is good - but I drove a "170hp" Forte last week as well as a "less powerful" Mazda 3 and an even less powerful 2010 Civic.  Sorry, no comparison.  The 3 (and the Civic, for that matter) and Forte are not even in the same league.  The Kia is a cheap car that will be bought by budget conscious drivers, not driving enthusiasts.  That is fine with me, but call it what it is.
What an insulting (or should say, ignorant) comment. It sounds suspicious that you actually "drove" the Koup. It is a real looker for sure.
Nevertheless, real driving enthusiasts would not drive a mundane fwd civic "SI", lol. You must be budget conscious as well because you could not afford a 350z or G35, etc. What a nonsense.

 No Trolling

I drive a automatic Protege5. I guess I ain't an auto enthusiast then, since I can't afford a Porsche 911.  Roll Eyes
Logged

Mine: 2004 Acura TSX
Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i
leaverfast
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #70 on: October 14, 2009, 06:56:59 pm »

I drive a automatic Protege5. I guess I ain't an auto enthusiast then, since I can't afford a Porsche 911.  Roll Eyes

Um... 2hondas, sorry to say that you missed the point.
What makes him think that driving enthusiasts would not drive the Koup but the Civic?
Driving M3 myself, they are just another sporty cars (no offense).

By the way, an auto enthusiast and a driving enthusiast may not be the same.
Logged
toolatecrew
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 08 VW GTI
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth NS
Posts: 2551


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #71 on: October 15, 2009, 07:07:25 am »

Whoa, my comparison of a Mazda 3 and Kia Forte touched off some anger.

Power is not just measured in Bhp - it is how the car responds.  I am willing to give Kia and Hyundai a chance, believe me - anything that wakes Honda up to the needs of consumers is good - but I drove a "170hp" Forte last week as well as a "less powerful" Mazda 3 and an even less powerful 2010 Civic.  Sorry, no comparison.  The 3 (and the Civic, for that matter) and Forte are not even in the same league.  The Kia is a cheap car that will be bought by budget conscious drivers, not driving enthusiasts.  That is fine with me, but call it what it is.

My comment about fuel mileage is exactly that - driving the heck out of my 04 Civic Si, I never, ever average fuel economy worse than 8.5/100km, and that is even winding the snot out of it - all the way to 6500rpm btw shifts - to enjoy the VTEC power.  Highway mileage the last time I took it from Toronto to Ottawa was just under 40mpg - about 7l/100km.


No anger. Your comment was clearly false.

You didn't say more refined. More responsive. You said more POWERFUL. Actually you said CLEARLY MORE POWERFUL. The only clear measures of power are empirical. Anything else is subjective and therefore not clear. I'll ask again how is a 168 hp Mazda CLEARLY more POWERFUL than a 170HP KIA. If you found the Mazda more responsive in back to back comparisons fine. Say that.

Check the 0-60 times. How is the Mazda "clearly" more powerful. All we ask is to say what you mean.
Logged

Canada Stig
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 131


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #72 on: October 27, 2009, 01:55:58 pm »

What an insulting (or should say, ignorant) comment. It sounds suspicious that you actually "drove" the Koup. It is a real looker for sure.
Nevertheless, real driving enthusiasts would not drive a mundane fwd civic "SI", lol. You must be budget conscious as well because you could not afford a 350z or G35, etc. What a nonsense.
[/quote]


If you ever need a ride to work, just give me a call.  I'll be the guy in the Black Mercedes.

And FYI, the G35 became the G37 a couple of years ago.  I cross shopped that when I bought the Benz.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2009, 01:57:36 pm by Canada Stig » Logged
dougjp
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2012 Mustang GT 6 speed manual & 2006 Jetta 2.0T DSG
Gender: Male
Location: Southern Ont.
Posts: 773


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #73 on: October 30, 2009, 06:09:11 pm »

Has Kia fixed the throttle tip in problem yet?
Logged

" A car can be a tool but it can also be so much more. It can be a heart-starter, it can be a drug, it can be a piece of art, it can stir your soul " ....Jeremy Clarkson
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #74 on: October 30, 2009, 07:33:15 pm »

no
Logged


Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #75 on: October 31, 2009, 12:06:09 am »

Was the tester a preproduction model or a production model?  It sounds like there's a big difference in quality in the Forte's case:

Quote
Alright, Kia. Something's going on here. I went on the Forte first drive in Seattle back in June and had a chance to drive the top-of-the-line Forte SX, and I came away distinctly unimpressed. Body roll, squealing tires, eager understeer, sluggish throttle response -- this thing was sport-tuned in name only. But that was a preproduction model. We've got a production Forte SX in the garage now, and I'm not even kidding, it's a revelation. Excellent grip, good body control, highly responsive steering...someone at Kia obviously decided that the SX needed to get its act together. Check this out -- the Forte shot through our slalom course at 68 mph, outpacing the brilliant Mazda 3 s by about 1.5 mph. Much respect to Kia for listening to criticism and making significant changes on the fly. That's part of what makes revolution possible.

http://blogs.edmunds.com/strategies/2009/10/weekly-top-3-pleasantly-surprised.html
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #76 on: October 31, 2009, 10:23:09 am »

Doubtful, it handled just fine, only issue is the throttle.  Drove the automatic at testfest it was brutal as well always spinning the tires on take off.
Logged


Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #77 on: November 02, 2009, 08:19:43 am »

Hey wing, someone wrote this comment on Autoblog's review of the Forte. I thought it was interesting and wondering if it might explain your problems with the throttle.

That throttle thing is normal for post-2006 Hyundai and Kia models with electronic throttle. I can remember leaving smoke in my wake just trying to pull out of my own driveway.

The ECM is designed to learn how you hit the gas and adapt to it, and at the same time your foot is adapting to the throttle. Eventually it evens out and becomes much more docile.

The throttle will resume doing these burnout starts if the ECM is ever reset for some reason, or if you force the throttle to reset. It will go through the learning process again and settle back down.


Do you think it's true?
Logged

wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #78 on: November 02, 2009, 11:06:13 am »

Doubt it
Logged


blur911
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Location: Kingston, On
Posts: 2237


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #79 on: November 02, 2009, 11:51:50 am »

If it was true, wouldn't they be touting this as a new Super Adaptive Positioning Servo Controlled Automatic Responding Throttle.
But then they read the acronym....

It's not a bug, it's a feature Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 39 queries.