Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2010 Subaru Legacy  (Read 3213 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2009, 10:46:48 am »

I agree with you on the styling... the current Legacy and Outback are both much better than these 2010 models...

BUT... they are small inside. That is my main problem with them. Only kids could sit somewhat comfortably behind me when I'm driving. For a vehicle as long as the Outback is, there's just no excuse for its poor interior space, especially for rear passengers. I'm glad Subaru has finally realized this and adjusted the Forester, Legacy and Outback to be more competitive.
Logged

Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: July 30, 2009, 10:47:53 am »

Making it bigger and fatter is simply retrograde no matter what the rest of the segment is doing.

Even if you set aside the rest of the industry, how about what the rest of Subaru's lineup is doing?  The current Legacy doesn't offer appreciably more space than the current Impreza.  Imagine if the Accord was the same size as the Civic.  How could that possibly make sense?

Quote
It's a mystery to me how anyone could prefer the styling of this:


To this:



I didn't say I prefer it from a purely styling perspective.  I said it was "not great, but not unpleasasnt."  Yes, the 2006's styling was better.  And for what it's worth, I think that the 2010 design works better in Legacy sedan form than it does in Outback form.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6801


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2009, 10:58:19 am »


Even if you set aside the rest of the industry, how about what the rest of Subaru's lineup is doing?  The current Legacy doesn't offer appreciably more space than the current Impreza.  Imagine if the Accord was the same size as the Civic.  How could that possibly make sense?


I thought making the Imprezza larger was a bad idea too. It's the same sort of incremental change that turned the Civic into an Accord, size-wise.
Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
Honda Owner
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Accord
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1250


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: July 30, 2009, 11:04:21 am »

I looked at the Legacy website and the 2010 was considerably cheaper than the 2009. Overall it looks like a very nice package but the lack of wagon is indeed a bit odd.
Logged
Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2009, 11:10:06 am »

I looked at the Legacy website and the 2010 was considerably cheaper than the 2009. Overall it looks like a very nice package but the lack of wagon is indeed a bit odd.

I'd be interested to see a sales breakdown between 2009 Legacy sedan, 2009 Legacy wagon, and 2009 Outback.  I suspect the vast majority of Subie buyers took doors 1 and 3.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
tortoise
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2544



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: July 30, 2009, 11:16:20 am »


I'd be interested to see a sales breakdown between 2009 Legacy sedan, 2009 Legacy wagon, and 2009 Outback.  I suspect the vast majority of Subie buyers took doors 1 and 3*.

*in the U.S. 

Which I supppose is all that matters.  But in Canada (and Vermont, which is kinda like Canada) I see more Legacy wagons on the roads than sedans.  And I'd say as many wagons as Outbacks.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2009, 11:18:16 am by tortoise » Logged

Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.
Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: July 30, 2009, 12:09:35 pm »


I'd be interested to see a sales breakdown between 2009 Legacy sedan, 2009 Legacy wagon, and 2009 Outback.  I suspect the vast majority of Subie buyers took doors 1 and 3*.

*in the U.S. 

Which I supppose is all that matters.  But in Canada (and Vermont, which is kinda like Canada) I see more Legacy wagons on the roads than sedans.  And I'd say as many wagons as Outbacks.

Agreed. It seems that 9 out of 10 Legacy I see on the road is of the wagon variant. I'm sure it's the complete opposite in the states.

I think Subaru simply figures everyone will move from the Legacy wagon to the Outback, but I doubt this will happen as the Outback is just too much of a jump price-wise... Make the Outback within $2k of what a Legacy Wagon costed before and then people wouldn't mind.
Logged

Juke1
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Nissan Juke SL AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2053

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: July 30, 2009, 12:42:03 pm »

Legacy numbers have nowhere to go but up, 1200 cars YTD is not much, the Impreza and Forrester both have sold in the 4000,s each to date.  So I see Subaru opting a new strategy with this offering.
Logged

Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. - Dale Carnegie

Diversity is not about how we differ.  Diversity is about embracing one another's uniqueness.  -Ola Joseph
ggweci
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 CRV EX 4WD, 2003 Protege5
Gender: Male
Location: GTA
Posts: 391


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2009, 08:15:31 am »

It's a mystery to me how anyone could prefer the styling of this:


To this:




My wife likes the new one much better and in fact, she actually really likes the new Impreza and Forester.  She would actually consider purchasing a Subaru now, where she wouldn't have stepped foot in a dealership with the previous gens of these models.  So, imo, Subaru is doing something right for the "mainstream" buying public.

I myself like both styles.  I really like the pre-2010 sedan and wagon, Outback not-so-much, but these 2010 model looks pleasing in both sedan and Outback versions.  It has a much more upscale look than the current gen.
Logged
toolatecrew
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 08 VW GTI
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth NS
Posts: 2551


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: August 09, 2009, 09:02:15 am »

I got a good chuckle out of this when I read it:
Quote
But did you know Subaru also makes a midsize sedan?

Okay, the question’s a bit facetious, but the Legacy sedan has lagged behind its competition for years, despite having standard all-wheel drive (AWD) and a range of desirable standard features. Even Subaru executives admit that for most consumers, Legacy is not even on their list.

Anyone who reads Canadian Driver knows about the Legacy whether they want to or  not. I belive the previous version was reviewed no less than 12 times in every configuration possible. By far the most reviewed vehicle on this site.

My opinion (my father has an 08 2.5 limited) I much prefer the styling and interior of the last version. I do appreciate that they made the 2010 larger as the past version deffinitley was tight inside.

Logged

johngenx
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Toyota Corolla 2001 Subaru Forester 2001 Suzuki Hayabusa
Gender: Male
Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
Posts: 9879



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: August 23, 2009, 09:07:05 pm »

How can the Subaru execs not know the CVT is HORRIBLE?  My god the thing is nothing but chain noise and it keeps the engine rpm WAY too high, above the torque band.  It's the worst transmission I've ever used.  30 seconds into a test drive and it's "whoops, we're done, not buying this POS."

The 2010 Outback Wagon is more akin to a CUV now than a wagon. I thought it ungainly tall and the rear end styling nowhere nice as the 2009 model.  As for the 2010 being larger, check the specs.  It's not really bigger where it counts.
Logged

No place I'd rather be...
mmret
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 TSX, 07 Z4 3.0si
Gender: Male
Location: Not Hamilton
Posts: 6411


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: August 23, 2009, 10:45:31 pm »

What gets me is why they funneled money into a CVT project instead of just building more of the 5 cog slushbox. Ditch the four.
Logged

Have: 06 TSX, 07 Z4 3.0si Roadster
Sometimes Borrow: 11 GLK
Had: 01 GrandAm, 07 Civic
Dream: SLS AMG
johngenx
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Toyota Corolla 2001 Subaru Forester 2001 Suzuki Hayabusa
Gender: Male
Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
Posts: 9879



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: August 23, 2009, 11:45:55 pm »

What gets me is why they funneled money into a CVT project instead of just building more of the 5 cog slushbox. Ditch the four.

The CVT was a giant waste of money and if anyone buys one, I'll be shocked.  The NVH of the trans is horrific and the rpm it finds under acceleration is completely wrong for the engine. I'd MUCH rather have the old 2.5L four speed driveline of my 2001 Forester than the brand new CVT in the OBW.
Logged

No place I'd rather be...
Erik
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 300C
Location: Torana
Posts: 3128



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: August 24, 2009, 01:44:52 am »

Bigger, huh?
Maybe I will fit into this one.....

For me anyway, the Outback was done after this one:

Logged

"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." - Sir William Lyons
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 36 queries.