jeremyb
Learner's Permit
Offline
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 26
|
 |
« on: June 13, 2009, 10:43:32 pm » |
|
Hi - need a 4x4 or AWD for under $10,000. Priority is reliability balanced with value for money - in fact, nothing else matters. What is your recommendation? Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2009, 10:52:23 pm » |
|
Have a look a Nissan Pathfinders. I had an '03 for 5 1/2 years and 140K+ that was trouble free. They have a pretty good reputation for reliability. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2009, 12:40:40 am » |
|
Have a look a Nissan Pathfinders. I had an '03 for 5 1/2 years and 140K+ that was trouble free. They have a pretty good reputation for reliability.
I second that. A 2002/2003 Pathfinder (SE or LE) would be one of the best bets. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jeremyb
Learner's Permit
Offline
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2009, 02:27:06 pm » |
|
Thanks for that. Would a Frontier Quad Cab be similar in quality/reliability/price?
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
2hondas1BMW
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2009, 02:32:21 pm » |
|
A Tacoma with a non rusted out frame.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mine: 2004 Acura TSX Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i
|
|
|
|
Trainman
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2009, 05:18:31 pm » |
|
Try looking for a 2002 or so Chilkoot. I had one and it comes with a good set of options but keeps away from some of the pricier repair issue that may crop up for the fancy gadgets the higher trim levels have.
I am not sure what the price points are for Fronties, but they are good too so I have heard from those who have them.
Now if you do not need the 4wd capability of these, then take a look at Subaru Foresters, they are as reliable as the Nissan's, ride better, get better fuel economy too. I got rid of the Pathy as I was no longer using its off-road ability and I have saved myself around $1,200 in fuel since September. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2009 Subaru Forester X Touring Edition 
|
|
|
jeremyb
Learner's Permit
Offline
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2009, 06:23:45 pm » |
|
That's interesting, thanks. I'm wary of the Forester as it gets older - they seem to encounter engine problems at around 10 yrs old? I would be investing in something to keep for a long time...
Anyone tried the Hyundai Santa Fe? Comparable to the Pathfinder? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Careener
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2009, 06:29:46 pm » |
|
if you want low price, take a look at the older Kia Sportage..a body on frame truck that I know was used by some 4x4 training schools.
Nissan also has the XTerra.. a capable offroader. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Former Rust Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
rrocket
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2009, 06:41:13 pm » |
|
RAV4, CR-V or Forester. All pretty good.
Pathfinder is nice...but boy, can they drink the fuel...
If cost of fuel is no biggie...l'd spring the extra few bucks and get a 2001+ Infiniti QX4. Identical mechanically to the Pathfinder...but loaded with a nicer interior. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
How fast is my Supra? I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
|
|
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2009, 06:50:35 pm » |
|
Anyone tried the Hyundai Santa Fe? Comparable to the Pathfinder?
For 10K you can only get the previous gen Santa Fe I guess and based on what I know from a close friend owning a 2001, I'd stay way from it. Not comparable to the Pathfinder (my neighbor friend has a '99 still going strong, but indeed, it likes to drink a lot of gas). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Squishy
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2009, 06:57:44 pm » |
|
If considering the RAV4 or CR-V, don't forget the Escape. The V6 + CD4E transmission is borderline problematic, but the four cylinder models are problem-free. Unstoppable in the snow and a capable soft-roader. The 2005 model with the updated 2.3 L engine should be just above the 10k mark.
But in terms of longevity and value, I would look at older four-cylinder compact pickups. Tacoma or Ranger would be nice if you don't need the extra seats. Body-on-frame SUVs also last a long time, but man they drink fuel. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 The Garage:1999 Ford Escort SE, 2001 Acura MDX, 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer ES, 2003 Ford Escape XLS
|
|
|
|
kardood69
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2009, 06:58:56 pm » |
|
If you're talking more the 4x4 side, all the late model Jeeps are pretty good, and they are cheap.
You can probably get a fairly recent Liberty for that price.
Older Jeep Cherokees are holding up well, esp say 94-2001. Often get 300K km on the inline 6. The 4-speed Auto is Aisin sourced (not ChryCo) and the 5-speed is very solid.
The Grand Cherokee is pretty comfortable and for the most part well equiped..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Leviathan
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2009, 07:52:39 pm » |
|
1999-2005 Chevy Tracker/Suzuki Grand Vitara?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Chris Matthews, CNBC: "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour" Jon Stewart: "This guy is one scotch away from being Ron Burgundy"
|
|
|
|
johngenx
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2009, 11:17:07 pm » |
|
For a high-clearance 4X4, I echo the Pathfinder recommendation. Valued lower than 4-Runners, good off-road, pretty reliable and very good value in the used market. A friend of mine has a 2001 Pathy that has been very good to her.
As for on-road and mild offroading ability, the Forester is very good. My 2001 is solid, reliable and fuel economy is good. Most of my climbing partners have Subarus in the 2000-2003 range, and they have all logged high mileages without problems. My Forester has been taken up some pretty bad roads and over some terrain I doubt that Subaru ever intended it to travel on. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No place I'd rather be... 
|
|
|
|
Turbo Bob
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2009, 11:47:28 pm » |
|
A used mitsubishi outlander with it's ridiculously long warranty. Built in Japan. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you! 
|
|
|
|
initial_D
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2009, 02:49:07 pm » |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara v6 ...
Tough for a decent shape 4x4 under $10,000. Most of the ones under that price do need some work, be prepare for that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ontariodriver
Auto Obsessed
 
OfflineVehicle: Toyota Echo & a Prius
Location: Ontario
Posts: 941
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2009, 06:13:13 pm » |
|
You find some great Toyota 4Runners in that price.  Also Mitsubishi and Suzuki are good value for money.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Honda Owner
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2009, 07:07:33 pm » |
|
Older Jeep Cherokees are holding up well, esp say 94-2001. Often get 300K km on the inline 6. The 4-speed Auto is Aisin sourced (not ChryCo) and the 5-speed is very solid. God no! And that is speaking as a Chrysler service guy. The engines and trannies stand up but nothing else does and the things drink high test gas like a Peterbuilt. I would also recommend the Grand Vitara. Not flashy but pretty near bullet proof and will not cost the farm to run. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2009, 09:57:11 pm » |
|
Older Jeep Cherokees are holding up well, esp say 94-2001. Often get 300K km on the inline 6. The 4-speed Auto is Aisin sourced (not ChryCo) and the 5-speed is very solid. God no! And that is speaking as a Chrysler service guy. The engines and trannies stand up but nothing else does and the things drink high test gas like a Peterbuilt. I would also recommend the Grand Vitara. Not flashy but pretty near bullet proof and will not cost the farm to run. As a former GC owner I can second that. The words "reliability" and "Grand Cherokee" don't belong in the same sentence! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
gta_driver
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2009, 11:43:58 am » |
|
I use to own a 2000 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4 door with the inline 6.
Pros:
-Super reliable -Cheap to fix and maintain. If your a Do-it-yourselfer you'll love it. -the inline 6 is powerful -excellent towing -unstoppable in any terrain (as long as its equipped with the right tires) -very manueverable -AC/Heater was quite powerful -cargo capacity
Cons:
-Ride -drinks regular gasoline like you wouldn't believe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Current Drives-->MB B-Class * Saab 95 SportCombi*Infiniti J30t "I don't apologize for being rich."
|
|
|
|