Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTC Review: 2009 Audi A4 3.2  (Read 7631 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
v_alber
Noob
*
Offline Offline

Location: Toronto
Posts: 1


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2009, 10:06:48 am »

If you want to spend 50 big one on a car- get 335. A lot more performance, a lot more smile per mile. Plus the 4 year maintenance is included and therefore free.
With those perfromance number this car simply does not make sense.
Logged
Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2009, 10:22:50 am »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.

If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.

http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
vdk
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 GTI, '06 ZZR600
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4710


I try and stay limber, swim, run, ride motorcycles


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2009, 12:38:27 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.


Meh... there's no stick anymore.. B7 still had a stick IIRC.. maybe a left-over '08?
Logged

Cortina
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 1496



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2009, 12:57:21 pm »

I just wish Audi would stop putting those ridiculous lights on every model, they look OK on the R8, they look like christmas tree decorations on everything else...

Worse, to me.  They make the car look like a cheap streetwalker with too much eye makeup.

The lights look down right freaky on a dark county lane until you work out what the hell it is. Smiley
Logged
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2009, 03:47:56 pm »

So Snowy if I'm reading that right, you'd take a less powerful model with nicer interior trim?! Shame on you! Ha ha.
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: April 09, 2009, 04:00:00 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.

If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.

http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue
Logged

Oz
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: e92 BMW 328i Coupe
Gender: Male
Location: Klingon
Posts: 1354



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: April 09, 2009, 04:31:25 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.

If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.

http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue


And thinking outside hatch territory.  Shocked
Logged

Enlightenment.  The air smells sweeter.  Birds sing more cheerfully.  Sex is better.  Life is good with a manual transmission.  - GD, 2009
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: April 09, 2009, 04:39:11 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.



If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.

http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue


And thinking outside hatch territory.  Shocked


I am hooked on wagon\hatch's

Logged

Oz
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: e92 BMW 328i Coupe
Gender: Male
Location: Klingon
Posts: 1354



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: April 09, 2009, 04:52:53 pm »

A4 Avant for you it is.  Grin
Logged

Enlightenment.  The air smells sweeter.  Birds sing more cheerfully.  Sex is better.  Life is good with a manual transmission.  - GD, 2009
tpl
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: VW GTI, Honda Fit
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph On.
Posts: 13963



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: April 09, 2009, 05:04:22 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.

If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.






http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue


Assuming a 2010 2.0T can be done the same way as a current one then APR can do it and more.  But it looks like a big job,  chip + bigger turbo etc. etc. for sure not for $2K.   
Logged

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.
Lord Palmerston
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: April 09, 2009, 07:40:18 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.


If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.






http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue


Assuming a 2010 2.0T can be done the same way as a current one then APR can do it and more.  But it looks like a big job,  chip + bigger turbo etc. etc. for sure not for $2K.   


I’m not up on the Audi aftermarket but an ECU flash, Down Pipe, and Turbo Back should gain 50 HP? Not going down the bigger turbo route again....$$$$$$$
Logged

vdk
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 GTI, '06 ZZR600
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4710


I try and stay limber, swim, run, ride motorcycles


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: April 09, 2009, 07:44:55 pm »

The ECU flash itself had ~50hp gains.. for the last 2.0T on 93.
Logged

tpl
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: VW GTI, Honda Fit
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph On.
Posts: 13963



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: April 09, 2009, 08:58:50 pm »

I have always been a huge fan of the A4 when it comes to interior and exterior styling. I even got to drive Jeff’s shiny new one in weasing 1.8T trim Smiley .

With Audi making advancements in reliability I would like to revisit the A4 Avant as a possible option but I just wish there was an affordable 250 HP version. I’m not sure one can safely take a 2.0 to 280 HP which would not reach my 300 goal but the styling would make up the difference.


If 93 octane gas is readily available where you live, I think you'd be impressed with what a REVO Stage II chip could do for you.  On the old 200 horse, 207 lb-ft 2.0T, a Stage II chip would get you to 255 hp, 290 lb-ft.






http://www.revotechnik.com/products/softwareProduct.aspx?pvID=592

But now the 2.0T in the A4 makes 211 horsepower, 258 lb-ft.  Imagine where a Stage II chip would get you with that as your starting point.  (I assume that REVO will have a chip for the 211 horsepower engine soon, but I didn't see one on their page).


Even with my WRX I tune for 91 due to some trips north where 93 is not available. Your mission should you chose to accept it is to me a way to get a 2010 A4 Avant to +/-270 HP...... I would put it on my short list.
Yes Bob, I am pushing 50 and perhaps showing weakness  Tongue


Assuming a 2010 2.0T can be done the same way as a current one then APR can do it and more.  But it looks like a big job,  chip + bigger turbo etc. etc. for sure not for $2K.   


I’m not up on the Audi aftermarket but an ECU flash, Down Pipe, and Turbo Back should gain 50 HP? Not going down the bigger turbo route again....$$$$$$$


Apr claim 355 bhp with all that and the big turbo. >$5kUSD 
Logged

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.
Lord Palmerston
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2009, 12:13:16 am »

Seriously James, you mention cupholders one more time in a review and I'm never reading one again.  Tongue
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #34 on: April 10, 2009, 03:41:40 am »

If you want to spend 50 big one on a car- get 335. A lot more performance, a lot more smile per mile. Plus the 4 year maintenance is included and therefore free.
With those perfromance number this car simply does not make sense.

A general rule of thumb for the German luxury-mainstream (i.e., not mass-market, not exotic) three:

Go BMW if you want performance first.  Go Mercedes if you want luxury first.  Go Audi if you want a compromise.  In this case, you'd get more room and I think a much nicer interior with the Audi, but the BMW unquestionably is the better driver's car.

The rule of thumb isn't ALWAYS true, but it seems to be true more often than not.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #35 on: April 10, 2009, 05:37:08 pm »

I watched a test on Motoring TV on the A4 Avant on a break from the Masters….they were happy...good review
Logged

Giant Dwarf
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 BMW 335i, '10 Mazda6 GT
Gender: Male
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 10223



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #36 on: April 13, 2009, 06:18:21 pm »

I just wish Audi would stop putting those ridiculous lights on every model, they look OK on the R8, they look like christmas tree decorations on everything else...

Worse, to me.  They make the car look like a cheap streetwalker with too much eye makeup.

Well you know what they say it takes one to.... err... nevermind.   Shocked Lips Sealed Grin Kiss

I really like the LEDs.  They become part of Audi's brand character, and in terms of functionality, they seem to be more visible than normal DRLs.  When you see a car with these lights, you can automatically associate it with the Audi brand.  I think it's a good move for Audi. 

"Looks like a christmas tree"... indeed.  Coming from a guy who prefers bright orange clown cars.   Roll Eyes

I like the looks of the current generation A4s, but always seem to see them with little, ugly 17" (or are they 16"?) wheels on them which completely ruins the look of the car. 

The interior is awesome though (by what I see in the pictures).  Far better than the e90 3-series I think.

Snowman... you mowing your own fairways when you golf?
Logged
Oz
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: e92 BMW 328i Coupe
Gender: Male
Location: Klingon
Posts: 1354



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #37 on: April 13, 2009, 07:43:03 pm »

Snowman... you mowing your own fairways when you golf?

 Grin Grin

To get ahead, man does what he has to.
Logged

Enlightenment.  The air smells sweeter.  Birds sing more cheerfully.  Sex is better.  Life is good with a manual transmission.  - GD, 2009
EddieV
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #38 on: April 14, 2009, 02:31:34 am »

A G37x would be a great sub for this car. Cheaper, more power 328hp, probably more reliable too. If you want the "GERMAN" feel its a different story but if I had the money it would be a G37x sedan or a Cadillac CTS with DI and AWD. 
Logged
Bullet Blue
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 6775



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #39 on: April 23, 2009, 09:52:39 am »

Audi is dropping the 3.2 engine in the 2010 A4, A3 and TT:

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/22/audi-dropping-3-2-liter-v6-from-2010-a3-a4-and-tt/

Just as well. The turbo offers more pep and fuel efficiency.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 42 queries.