Author Topic: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan  (Read 1367 times)

Offline articsteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: ON
  • Posts: 15055
  • Carma: +31/-163
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobbie Car: 1990 944S2
Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« on: March 31, 2009, 12:15:33 am »
Jamie LaReau
Automotive News
March 30, 2009 - 2:14 pm ET

President Barack Obama's auto task force says General Motors will be hard-pressed to meet its projections in five key areas without a dramatic restructuring.

In response to the viability plan GM submitted Feb. 17, the task force demanded that GM intensify its restructuring over the next 60 days or face possible bankruptcy.

In a statement released today, the task force criticized GM's assumptions in these areas:

1. Market share

2. Price

3. Brands/dealers

4. Product mix

5. Legacy liabilities

The task force did not dispute that GM is in the early stages of a turnaround, saying it has made "material progress in a number of areas, including purchasing, product design, manufacturing, brand rationalization and its dealer network."

But despite that progress, GM's current plan "contemplates initiatives that will take many years to complete," the task force wrote.

Details on the key areas:

1. Market share

In 2008, GM's North American market share was 21.5 percent, down from 23.8 percent in 2006. In its Feb. 17 viability plan, GM estimated that its market share would be 21.1 percent this year and decline to 19.4 percent in 2012 and 19.1 percent by 2014.

But the task force noted that GM has been losing market share for decades. "Yet its plan assumes only a very moderate decline, despite reducing fleet sales and shuttering brands that represent 1.8 percent of its current market share," the task force wrote.

GM is looking to sell Hummer and Saab and has committed to providing product to Saturn through the 2012 model year. If Saturn can't be spun off, GM will phase out the brand.

Obama's team is pushing GM to move more quickly to make itself competitive.

2. Price

GM's February viability plan did not discuss its expectations on pricing, said GM spokesman Tom Wilkinson. He added that "the task force went through all of this and did their own financial analysis."

And the task force analysis found flaws in GM's assumptions.

"The plan assumes improvement in net price realization despite a severely distressed market, lingering consumer quality perceptions and an increase in smaller vehicles," the task force report noted. It went on to mention how GM historically has struggled to maintain pricing power.

The task force noted that in 2006 and 2007, GM North America achieved a 30.4 percent "contribution margin" -- the sale price minus any variable costs of building the car. GM assumes that margin will increase to 30.8 percent this year and be at 30.7 percent in 2010, 30.9 percent in 2013, and 30.3 percent in 2014, the task force says.

That's despite a distressed market and an increased focus on passenger cars and crossovers, which traditionally have yielded lower margins than big trucks.

3. Brands/dealers

GM is currently "burdened with underperforming brands, nameplates and an excess of dealers," the task force said.

GM said it plans to offer just four core brands -- Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC --and a cut-down version of Pontiac. GM also said it would reduce its dealer count from 6,246 in 2008 to 4,100 in 2014.

The task force said those measures are not aggressive enough.

4. Product mix

GM said its restructuring plan would allow it to produce "fewer, better" entries because it will have fewer brands, nameplates and dealers. GM said cutting brands would improve profitability because more than 90 percent of its U.S. profits are derived from the four core brands.

But the task force noted that GM earns a large portion of its profits from high-margin pickups and SUVs, "which are vulnerable to a continuing shift in consumer preference to smaller vehicles."

The report went on to say that while the Chevrolet Volt electric hybrid car "holds promise," it will be too pricey for short-term commercial success.

GM has estimated that the Volt likely would come to market with a $40,000 or more sticker.

5. Legacy liabilities

GM owes $20 billion to its Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association plan. It is trying to persuade the UAW to take half of that amount in stock rather than cash.

GM also indicated that the asset values in its pension fund have declined significantly over the past six months. GM's total U.S. qualified pension plans had $84.2 billion in assets at the end of 2008, compared with $104.1 billion in 2007. That has left GM's pension plans only 87 percent funded last year, compared with 124 percent funded the year before.

The task force said that going forward, GM's cash needs associated with legacy liabilities grow "to unsustainable levels, reaching approximately $6 billion per year in 2013 and 2014."

For GM to meet that obligation, it will need to sell 900,000 more vehicles per year. That would leave GM "fighting to maximize volume rather than return on investment," the task force said.

The task force said that GM's progress over the past few years has been "far too slow" in these five areas and that if the company is to survive, its stakeholders must engage in a "substantially more aggressive restructuring plan."
 
“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.

Offline vdk

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • Posts: 4882
  • Carma: +17/-12
  • Gender: Male
  • I try and stay limber, swim, run, ride motorcycles
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2009, 01:24:56 am »
Apart from other stuff. Why are they keeping GMC around?  ???

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: NB
  • Posts: 3819
  • Carma: +84/-60
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '11 Mercedes ML350 Bluetec '11 BMW 328iXdrive
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2009, 05:49:38 am »
I guess I can seeing keeping Buick in Asia but as far as NA sales are concerned why not just Chevy-Cadillac? I mean aren't Chevy and GMC trucks basicly the same thing under the skin? In terms of cars it would seem to make sense to follow the Toyota/Lexus and Nissan/Infiniti model of having one mainstream and one highline brand.

I really don't understand the idea of Pontiac as a niche "sporty" brand. When I think of GM and "sporty cars" I think Camaro and Corvette.
My first ever GM ownership experience  can best be described as   "Fool me once...."

Offline toolatecrew

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Dartmouth NS
  • Posts: 2551
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2009, 07:24:38 am »
Funny aren't those all falws in the paln that were pointed pout by posters in thsi forum like the day after it was published?

The brands and dealers in particular. People have been saying they have way too many bands for a long long time. I did a case study on GM in 1993 in my Masters program. The conclusion. They needed to cut brands. The response from the professor..GM culture won't allow it find another solution.

The dealers? I debunked that the day after the detailed plan was released. Short term they planned to reduce the number for dealers by 2012 by very colse to the nukber of Saturn/Saabb dealers out there right now. Not really reducing dealers to allow more sales per dealer just trimming dealers that would be gone anyways through the sale of brands or through natural attrution.

Nameplates? For all their bluster about reducing brands their plan actuallay results in MORE nameplates per brand than before. Yes the ttoal number is less but of course it would be oless when you turf 2.5 brands entirley.

I'd like to see them survive but when you are talking this type of $ in this type of economy you can't really think that you can overcome a poor plan by fudging the sales and growth projections to compensate can you?

Offline carcrazy

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: GTA
  • Posts: 4048
  • Carma: +1/-1
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2009, 10:46:11 am »
One positive sign from this rejection is that finaly someone with authority actually analyzed the "plans", called them BS and explained why.
Now I'm not sure that a good alternate solution can be crafted, but it's a step forward anyway. 

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: NB
  • Posts: 3819
  • Carma: +84/-60
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '11 Mercedes ML350 Bluetec '11 BMW 328iXdrive
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2009, 11:04:44 am »
I just hope that they (the US and CDN gov) are smart enough to stick by their guns and not end up pouring money down a rat hole. If the companies come up with a plan that has a reasonable chance of success and give the taxpayers a decent chance of seeing the money again fine. Otherwise.........Sydney Steel and Devco anyone?

Offline Cortina

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: SW Ontario
  • Posts: 1496
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2009, 11:33:30 am »
I think the only way foward is Two product lines.

Scrap Pontiac-Saturn-GMC - Sell GM DAT and Saab- Sell Buick to the chinese

GM

Three Cars - Small-Med-Large.
Two SUV's/Cross- Small-Med.
Two TrucK - Med-Large.
Two Vans - Commercial - Mini-Van

Caddy Brand

Two Whizo Lux cars.
One Whizzo Lux Suv.

Online tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14422
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2009, 11:58:36 am »
I think the only way foward is Two product lines.

Scrap Pontiac-Saturn-GMC - Sell GM DAT and Saab- Sell Buick to the chinese

GM

Three Cars - Small-Med-Large.
Two SUV's/Cross- Small-Med.
Two TrucK - Med-Large.
Two Vans - Commercial - Mini-Van

Caddy Brand

Two Whizo Lux cars.
One Whizzo Lux Suv.

And the Corvette and possibly the Camaro.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Offline barrie1

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: London Ont Canada
  • Posts: 14832
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2009, 05:40:33 pm »
Better yet lets just stop all imports from coming into these 2 Countries and play the same game as many of them do with restrictive laws. GM and Chrysler would certainly do much better then with a level playing field. There products are as good if not better built then many of the imports anyways.  :)

Offline RunsinLight

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
  • Carma: +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2006 Pontiac G5 Pursuit Couple
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2009, 05:55:40 pm »
 :laugh:

Offline ovr50

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Kelowna, BC
  • Posts: 18426
  • Carma: +9/-120
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2009, 06:10:31 pm »
Better yet lets just stop all imports from coming into these 2 Countries and play the same game as many of them do with restrictive laws. GM and Chrysler would certainly do much better then with a level playing field. There products are as good if not better built then many of the imports anyways.  :)

What are you, Barrie, a robot programmed to only repeat endlessly the CAW based dogma??  :P :P

Have you any idea what that kind of protectionism would do to the rest of the Canadian economy? Or more likely, the auto unions don't care as long as they can preserve their cushy jobs.  :P
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport
and
2012 Toyota Camry SE V6 in Alpine White

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: My house
  • Posts: 18663
  • Carma: +81/-89
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2009, 06:25:06 pm »
Better yet lets just stop all imports from coming into these 2 Countries and play the same game as many of them do with restrictive laws. GM and Chrysler would certainly do much better then with a level playing field. There products are as good if not better built then many of the imports anyways.  :)

Barrie...have you been doing this tonight by chance????  LOL

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....

Offline aquadorhj

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Winter Wonderland
  • Posts: 1645
  • Carma: +53/-26
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2009, 06:28:11 pm »
I just hope that they (the US and CDN gov) are smart enough to stick by their guns and not end up pouring money down a rat hole. If the companies come up with a plan that has a reasonable chance of success and give the taxpayers a decent chance of seeing the money again fine. Otherwise.........Sydney Steel and Devco anyone?


And isn't Obama's ultimatum on Chrysler's to fix the fire under their as$ in 30 days basically saying Chryslers on fire sale and is practically free for Fiat to "Merge" with?

If Obama injected some liquidity into Chrysler (under severe guideline of course) to make it "SEEM" viable, the stock/bond holders would have at least had a chance at getting some of the money back(even though we are still talking pennies on dollars) in the "merger" deal...  Now it's just free for Fiat...  dumbasses..

Not that I really really care about Big 3 anymore... I still don't like any of them..   ..Except possibly CTS-V..

Driving thrills makes my wallet lighter.. and therefore makes me faster because i'm shedding weight... :D

Offline RunsinLight

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
  • Carma: +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2006 Pontiac G5 Pursuit Couple
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2009, 06:28:27 pm »
I think this was something far more nasty then Marijuana  :rofl:

Barrie...have you been doing this tonight by chance????  LOL


Offline aquadorhj

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Winter Wonderland
  • Posts: 1645
  • Carma: +53/-26
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2009, 06:36:22 pm »
Better yet lets just stop all imports from coming into these 2 Countries and play the same game as many of them do with restrictive laws. GM and Chrysler would certainly do much better then with a level playing field. There products are as good if not better built then many of the imports anyways.  :)

I'm sure you know, but USA places PLENTY of restrictions on imports(maybe not cars) on practically everything.
Even on us Canadians...  softwood, anyone?  maybe some beef?  what about mined minerals, eh?

so, in the intricacies of multi-national trade restrictions among all these parties, i'm sure the disadvantage of importing cars from asia/japan/europe whatever to US is off-set (or most likely advantageous) for the USA in the grand scheme of things.

Offline toolatecrew

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Dartmouth NS
  • Posts: 2551
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2009, 06:58:41 pm »
Better yet lets just stop all imports from coming into these 2 Countries and play the same game as many of them do with restrictive laws. GM and Chrysler would certainly do much better then with a level playing field. There products are as good if not better built then many of the imports anyways.  :)

Yeah shame on any comapany that would be in league with those godless imports.

Pontiac Vibe
Honda Engine in Saturn Vue.

Glass houses and stones anyone?

Offline vdk

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • Posts: 4882
  • Carma: +17/-12
  • Gender: Male
  • I try and stay limber, swim, run, ride motorcycles
    • View Profile
Re: Task force cites 5 key flaws in GM's viability plan
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2009, 06:58:53 pm »
Really dude.. That's a perfectly sound plan.. Can't compete with those nasty well made good on fuel and imports? Just ban them.. WTF they doing in MY country afterall ???