Author Topic: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT  (Read 27268 times)

Offline vdk

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • Posts: 4882
  • Carma: +17/-12
  • Gender: Male
  • I try and stay limber, swim, run, ride motorcycles
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #160 on: February 28, 2009, 01:29:21 am »
Odd that nobody has mentioned  that this car lists at just a hair below $30,000. Doesn't this strike anyone as a little high for this class of car?

But dude the one Wing had for a week had all the goodies you need, and it was $23k - $1k for the stick.. $22k  :thumbup: That's more than competitive.

Offline Leviathan

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Posts: 3195
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #161 on: February 28, 2009, 04:15:30 am »
Odd that nobody has mentioned  that this car lists at just a hair below $30,000. Doesn't this strike anyone as a little high for this class of car?
Not odd when you look at how the car is dolled up  ::)

From the article:
Quote
over $4,000 worth of options
I usually wouldn't care about some of the crap in that $4K but I could really see piloting this little beastie with the full load. 6 speed manual please. The front doesn't seem to bother me as much in some colours...

Quote
A fair bit of truth there. But I have to pay to drive such cars while auto journalists don't.
You don't have to buy the top-of-the-heap vehicle. Settle for an entry level Fit if that tickles your fancy but don't project on others  :)
Chris Matthews, CNBC: "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour"
Jon Stewart: "This guy is one scotch away from being Ron Burgundy"

Offline Rupert

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 981
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #162 on: February 28, 2009, 07:51:11 am »
We have a Mazda 3 in the family...not my personal cup of tea but can see the attractions for the younger set. The vehicle has been good overall but tire wear on inside edges has been experienced and note this on other examples. It used to be that the Focus was a close platform and wondered if that vehicle had the same phenomina. Think I prefer the Focus frontal effect to this one. Actually the front cycle fender styling is a bit of a challenge IMO but it is around on other mks also.

Offline airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Cobourg Ontario
  • Posts: 15975
  • Carma: +92/-89
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2000 BMW 323, 2010 Toyota Prius, 2011Chevy Silverado LTZ
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #163 on: February 28, 2009, 08:20:34 am »
How is it when you open the sunroof, the last model was very noise that I had a test drive in.

Offline Ice

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1551
  • Carma: +4/-3
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #164 on: February 28, 2009, 10:40:06 am »
How is it when you open the sunroof, the last model was very noise that I had a test drive in.
Are there any sunroofs that when open are not noisy?

Offline airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Cobourg Ontario
  • Posts: 15975
  • Carma: +92/-89
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2000 BMW 323, 2010 Toyota Prius, 2011Chevy Silverado LTZ
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #165 on: February 28, 2009, 10:59:55 am »
How is it when you open the sunroof, the last model was very noise that I had a test drive in.
Are there any sunroofs that when open are not noisy?

On my truck
Also it felt like a wind tunnel with it openned

Offline ghost

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: NIMBY capital of Canada
  • Posts: 3517
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #166 on: March 06, 2009, 07:07:13 pm »
My folks just picked up a 2010 mazda3 hatch. It looks great in person. It feels more upscale than before. All of a sudden the mkI looks dated drastically and that one was already a handsome car on my books.

Offline 1TSX

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: London, Ontario
  • Posts: 3311
  • Carma: +28/-26
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #167 on: March 06, 2009, 07:16:14 pm »
My dad drove the 2.5 and 2.0 L models a couple days ago.

His impressions were that the 2.0L felt more refined compared to the previous gen, and it felt "peppier" than the old model. He was quite impressed with the value of the comfort package + 2.0L engine. Isn't the 2.0L a carry over?

He didn't say much about the 2.5 though...the dealer said they sold 3 that day.  :-\
« Last Edit: March 06, 2009, 07:33:07 pm by 2hondas »
Mine: 2004 Acura TSX
Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i

Offline slimeballzz

  • Noob
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
  • Posts: 1
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #168 on: April 07, 2009, 06:09:39 pm »
I'm out looking for a new car and had my eyes on this.  But then I noticed for the price I could also get a second hand G35 or IS250.

Do you guys think it would cost significantly more to maintain a Lexus IS250 or Infiniti G35 versus this 2010 Mazda3 (GT-E version)? 

Offline Oz

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Klingon
  • Posts: 1354
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #169 on: April 07, 2009, 06:28:43 pm »
I'm out looking for a new car and had my eyes on this.  But then I noticed for the price I could also get a second hand G35 or IS250.

Do you guys think it would cost significantly more to maintain a Lexus IS250 or Infiniti G35 versus this 2010 Mazda3 (GT-E version)? 

If you want a new car get yourself a Genesis coupe. Otherwise the two cars you've listed are pretty damn good options. Personally I'd go with a 1-2 year used car from the two you mentioned.
Enlightenment.  The air smells sweeter.  Birds sing more cheerfully.  Sex is better.  Life is good with a manual transmission.  - GD, 2009

Offline Turbo Bob

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Waterloo
  • Posts: 9314
  • Carma: +20/-61
  • Gender: Male
  • Profesional Dash Stroker
    • View Profile
    • Rob Smith Photography
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #170 on: April 08, 2009, 11:55:18 am »
I think by asking the question you already have your answer.
Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!


cargo

  • Guest
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #171 on: January 30, 2010, 12:42:49 pm »
I had been planning on buying a new car this year and the Mazda3 was at the top of the list (currently drive a '95 Mazda Protege that still runs great but my kids are getting it). I was so incredibly disappointed when BAM, the 2010 model is ugly beyond comprehension. That stupid face on the car must have been designed by someone who chews bubble gum and puts smiley faces on their school report. Maybe the designer was on happy pills when he came up with that look. What were they thinking. Sorry Mazda, this car is now totally off my list. I could not buy something that creeps me out when I approach it. It annoys me that they would spoil an otherwise good car.

Trouble is, I don't like what Honda has to offer, Toyotas have the accelerator pedal thing, Ford and GM coddle you in cheap plastic. I am falling for the Volvo C30. It looks like a car, not a japanimation cartoon character.

Offline Ice

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1551
  • Carma: +4/-3
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #172 on: January 30, 2010, 05:09:41 pm »
I had been planning on buying a new car this year and the Mazda3 was at the top of the list (currently drive a '95 Mazda Protege that still runs great but my kids are getting it). I was so incredibly disappointed when BAM, the 2010 model is ugly beyond comprehension. That stupid face on the car must have been designed by someone who chews bubble gum and puts smiley faces on their school report. Maybe the designer was on happy pills when he came up with that look. What were they thinking. Sorry Mazda, this car is now totally off my list. I could not buy something that creeps me out when I approach it. It annoys me that they would spoil an otherwise good car.

Trouble is, I don't like what Honda has to offer, Toyotas have the accelerator pedal thing, Ford and GM coddle you in cheap plastic. I am falling for the Volvo C30. It looks like a car, not a japanimation cartoon character.

I guess if you can wait then grab a 2012 Ford Focus when they come out in early 2011 :)

Offline ovr50

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Kelowna, BC
  • Posts: 18426
  • Carma: +9/-120
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #173 on: January 30, 2010, 05:25:30 pm »
I like the Volvo C30 (but have not driven one).
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport
and
2012 Toyota Camry SE V6 in Alpine White

DS

  • Guest
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #174 on: June 15, 2010, 09:53:54 pm »
That old adage about not fixing what isn't broken was completely ignored by Mazda. New owners wouldn't realize what I'm talking about but as I owned the 1st Mazda3 model, I was disappointed with the dumb "fixes" made to the current model.
1) On sunny days, that light grey driver's side dashboard accent is beautifully reflected in the driver's side view mirror.
2) The centre console on the prior model was a two-door configuration. Now it's a single container with a stupid tray.
3) The rear cover that is connected to the hatch that keeps nosey people from looking into the rear window was articulated but not now.
4) There was a very cool compartment that could be erected in the hatchback area that has been completely removed.
Overall, I like the current car but the four changes mentioned above are, to put it bluntly, just plain stupid. Who ever approved them should be fired.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

Sunray Light

  • Guest
Re: CTC Review: 2010 Mazda3 GT
« Reply #175 on: July 20, 2010, 05:06:45 pm »
Nobody talks about how it feels while you drive Mazda 3 GT. I have replaced my Mazda 3 GT 2006 w/luxury package with 2010 the same (no navigation) and I am not impress. It does not sit in bends as well as the previous model. I used to drive 120km on the highway with my 2006 model almost with one finger. Well, you cannot do that with 2010 model. And once you reach 60km and your sunroof is fully open, what is this humming sound about? For $34,000 car it's not a value for your money. Sorry to say so. I am verry dissapointed and the moment I can sell and not loose too much on it, I will and get myself 2006 model. These are 2 different cars, I do not understand why are they even compared.