Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Disapointing venza test drive  (Read 25973 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2009, 09:07:41 pm »

RAV4 and Matrix.
Logged


Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2009, 09:16:00 pm »

My Vibe wasn't exactly plush. The Mazda3 was more compliant yet still more controlled and less body roll. Not enough cargo space, so practicality won out.
Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
articsteve
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: ON
Posts: 14441



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2009, 09:17:32 pm »

Matrix

Newest version?  Maybe more cushion on the seat will do it.  Smiley
Logged

“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: January 14, 2009, 09:19:27 pm »

I drove RAV4 with Trish, and no complaint....(Wing IS getting old...)
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
ggweci
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 CRV EX 4WD, 2003 Protege5
Gender: Male
Location: GTA
Posts: 391


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2009, 07:02:05 pm »

Now for the bad part
On the highway you could feel every small bump. it,s worse in town. There is also a huge amount of road noise coming from the rear of the vehicle. This is a noisey rough vehicle on the highway.The electric steering is very heavy feeling on the highway also. My Highlander is way more smoother & quieter on the road. The killer was the amount they offered me in a 15 month old Highlander on trade. Less then 1/2 of msrp.
Needless to say; the highlander is not getting traded in.

Interesting, and not something I was hoping/expecting to hear.  From what I've read on the Venza forums is that most people are pretty impressed with the driveability... some US owners have had their cars since the beginning of December with no complaints mentioned.

I'll have to take one for a spin myself one day. 
Logged
Greg B.
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 567


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: January 20, 2009, 06:08:18 pm »

The radio is Camry issue.

Along with much of the rest of the vehicle.

Quote
However, the VALUE unit will be the I4 and particularly in AWD.

Yep, an overpriced 4-banger with a buckboard ride sounds like a real deal.  Roll Eyes

BTW, time to change your sig file, Stevie.
Logged
articsteve
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: ON
Posts: 14441



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: January 20, 2009, 07:33:48 pm »

The radio is Camry issue.

Along with much of the rest of the vehicle.

Quote
However, the VALUE unit will be the I4 and particularly in AWD.

Yep, an overpriced 4-banger with a buckboard ride sounds like a real deal.  Roll Eyes

BTW, time to change your sig file, Stevie.

GM can only dream of a manufacturing a vehicle like an I4 AWD Venza.   

Tic toc, tic toc   Smiley
Logged

“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.
Greg B.
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 567


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: January 20, 2009, 08:11:19 pm »

GM can only dream of a manufacturing a vehicle like an I4 AWD Venza.   

Who said anything about GM?

Good luck with the grandson as the new bossman.
Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: January 20, 2009, 08:12:40 pm »

^^^^No luck required....Luck is for the unprepared....
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: January 20, 2009, 08:21:01 pm »

Given the I-4 Camry is around 9.5 seconds to 100km/hr and the Venza is up to 220kgs heavier, plus the added 15% or so for AWD driveline losses, she'll be designed for the senior's market for sure.

Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2009, 08:24:59 pm »

Given the I-4 Camry is around 9.5 seconds to 100km/hr and the Venza is up to 220kgs heavier, plus the added 15% or so for AWD driveline losses, she'll be designed for the senior's market for sure.



Actually..Venza is quicker.....9.3 seconds to 60.  Impressive considering the weight....Smiley

That's what...only .5 second slower than an Outback??   

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=137526?tid=edmunds.h..topfeatures.venzaft.0
« Last Edit: January 20, 2009, 08:28:18 pm by rrocket » Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
articsteve
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: ON
Posts: 14441



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2009, 08:39:35 pm »

Given the I-4 Camry is around 9.5 seconds to 100km/hr and the Venza is up to 220kgs heavier, plus the added 15% or so for AWD driveline losses, she'll be designed for the senior's market for sure.


The I4 Venza and the I4 Camry have different engines and different transmissions.  But hey, what do facts have anything to do with it.
Logged

“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.
Greg B.
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 567


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2009, 08:41:10 pm »

The I4 Venza and the I4 Camry have different engines and different transmissions.  But hey, what do facts have anything to do with it.

I suppose there can always be a first time for you.  Grin
Logged
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2009, 08:43:49 pm »

The I4 Venza and the I4 Camry have different engines and different transmissions.  But hey, what do facts have anything to do with it.

I suppose there can always be a first time for you.  Grin


Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Leviathan
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Tribute 4WD 2.3L 5 speed.
Gender: Male
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3195


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2009, 02:40:44 am »

GM can only dream of a manufacturing a vehicle like an I4 AWD Venza.   
Tic toc, tic toc   Smiley
Roll Eyes I'd buy the 2010 Equinox AWD with the direct injection I4 over a Venza. No contest.
Logged

Chris Matthews, CNBC: "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour"
Jon Stewart: "This guy is one scotch away from being Ron Burgundy"
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #35 on: January 21, 2009, 11:01:16 am »

Given the I-4 Camry is around 9.5 seconds to 100km/hr and the Venza is up to 220kgs heavier, plus the added 15% or so for AWD driveline losses, she'll be designed for the senior's market for sure.



Actually..Venza is quicker.....9.3 seconds to 60.  Impressive considering the weight....Smiley

That's what...only .5 second slower than an Outback??   

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=137526?tid=edmunds.h..topfeatures.venzaft.0

That Edmunds test was for the front wheel drive Venza. More weight and more driveline losses aren't going to improve its performance.

True, but the Outback is 200+kg lighter, comes with a manual transmission, a very good AWD system and I've gotten 7.0L/100km with it. Plus it comes in a spiffy two-tone paint scheme! Grin

The basic problem I have is Toyota is doing what the Big Three have done: too many overlapping models. They already have the RAV4 for those concerned with fuel economy, and the Highlander for those who need the room. This straddles both. All it's going to do is cannibalize Toyota's other models.

Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #36 on: January 21, 2009, 11:50:32 am »

...SO..............after ALL tha BANTER.....................is IT FIRM FLACCID ORTROUSER WORTHY...................Enquiring dirtyMINDS want to know......fer $38K it better be all three..................
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
Angry Chicken
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2 Japanese, 1 German
Location: I've been around
Posts: 1352


Don't get Clucky Angry!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #37 on: January 25, 2009, 09:59:49 pm »

Given the I-4 Camry is around 9.5 seconds to 100km/hr and the Venza is up to 220kgs heavier, plus the added 15% or so for AWD driveline losses, she'll be designed for the senior's market for sure.



Actually..Venza is quicker.....9.3 seconds to 60.  Impressive considering the weight....Smiley

That's what...only .5 second slower than an Outback??   

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=137526?tid=edmunds.h..topfeatures.venzaft.0

That Edmunds test was for the front wheel drive Venza. More weight and more driveline losses aren't going to improve its performance.

True, but the Outback is 200+kg lighter, comes with a manual transmission, a very good AWD system and I've gotten 7.0L/100km with it. Plus it comes in a spiffy two-tone paint scheme! Grin

The basic problem I have is Toyota is doing what the Big Three have done: too many overlapping models. They already have the RAV4 for those concerned with fuel economy, and the Highlander for those who need the room. This straddles both. All it's going to do is cannibalize Toyota's other models.

Well put.  I've also heard of some disturbing trends with respect to Toyota's quality relative to other makes.  My wife's Hyundai Santa Fe reminds me very much of where Toyota came from, not where it's going.  In the early 2000's, none other than Mr. Toyoda himself told his engineers to go back to their staple business which was/is designing and producing high quality automobiles when they started slipping in the JD Powers Initial Quality survey.  I've had one or two Toyotas over the years and have sat in and driven some of the newer ones like the Sienna and have been overwhelmed with the perceived quality of them relative to a mid 90's Camry that I once had.  Watering down of their model lines' identity isn't a good way to hang on to your core business.  I'm sure there's a lot more to the equation than that, but it makes one think about the brand's outlook.
Logged

Opinions are like noses; everyone has one.
tenpenny
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3848



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #38 on: January 26, 2009, 10:11:53 am »

True, but the Outback is 200+kg lighter, comes with a manual transmission, a very good AWD system and I've gotten 7.0L/100km with it. Plus it comes in a spiffy two-tone paint scheme! Grin

No, no.  You haven't been paying attention.  No matter what your personal experience is, NO Subaru gets better than 27 mpg.  Someone said so, right here on this forum.  So, just like me, your personal experience must be wrong!

Logged
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #39 on: January 26, 2009, 10:57:02 am »

True, but the Outback is 200+kg lighter, comes with a manual transmission, a very good AWD system and I've gotten 7.0L/100km with it. Plus it comes in a spiffy two-tone paint scheme! Grin

No, no.  You haven't been paying attention.  No matter what your personal experience is, NO Subaru gets better than 27 mpg.  Someone said so, right here on this forum.  So, just like me, your personal experience must be wrong!



My Bad! I'll try to pay closer attention! Grin
Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 40 queries.