|
CD_Editor
|
 |
« on: January 07, 2009, 12:03:13 am » |
|
 First Drive:   The best-selling Lexus in Canada, the RX SUV gets even better with the 2010 model, reports Senior Editor Paul Williams; the RX 350 and RX 450h (hybrid) receive revised powertrains, redesigned interiors and impressive new technologies. More: View the photos | All the First Drives
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rrocket
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2009, 12:13:12 am » |
|
Made in Canada!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
How fast is my Supra? I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
|
|
|
|
vdk
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2009, 12:19:29 am » |
|
too much venza for my tastes.. but overall better looking than the outgoing model.. gets the job done!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dave W
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2009, 01:56:56 am » |
|
multilink suspension = double-wishbone?
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cortina
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2009, 11:06:08 am » |
|
Are Toyota going back to 70's b/c even they just get fugly and fugly as of late.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2009, 11:23:49 am » |
|
The powertrain is sweet as usual, the materials and build quality most likely are typical Lexus - high quality, but boy the design is so not appealing to me, which again it's typical for Toyota. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Greg B.
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2009, 01:56:24 pm » |
|
A new version of the trophy wife's vehicle of choice... something for all those young ladies driving Rav4s to aspire to. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tortoise
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2009, 03:03:28 pm » |
|
Once again proving the "utililty" in SUV is completely misplaced. To me it really looks like the IS300 Sportcross jacked up.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.
|
|
|
|
Sir Osis of Liver
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2009, 03:55:04 pm » |
|
Once again proving the "utililty" in SUV is completely misplaced.
 In order to get the same cargo area as the Legacy/Outback, Jetta wagon or Passat, you've got to get into a pretty damn big CUV. Lots more body roll, weight and wind resistance too. I just don't understand these things at all. |
|
|
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 04:00:50 pm by Big_Thumb »
|
Logged
|
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2009, 04:04:52 pm » |
|
Going by the numbers, the 2010 RX350 cargo area is listed at some 40 cu.ft / 80 cu.ft. Although close, I doubt that any wagon posts similar numbers. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 04:17:02 pm by carcrazy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Osis of Liver
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2009, 04:17:00 pm » |
|
It's all vertical, it's not useful space unless you pile things over the seatback, which isn't safe. The Passat wagon is about 35cu ft with the seat up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2009, 04:30:35 pm » |
|
It's all vertical, it's not useful space unless you pile things over the seatback, which isn't safe. The Passat wagon is about 35cu ft with the seat up.
It may be helpful if you have a tall, bulky item. Anyway, I get and agree with your point, as I know it first-hand (this is one reason I like Outlander's cargo bay better than any other compact SUV). Most likely for the very same reason, I think in Europe the manufacturers post the cargo space up to the windows level. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Osis of Liver
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2009, 04:50:31 pm » |
|
The Outlander does better than most, probably class leader. I liked the tailgate too.
We were looking for the best space/efficiency compromise. The cute utes had much less space than the wagons. Mid-sized CUVs were better, but mileage went south in a hurry. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
carcrazy
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2009, 05:06:01 pm » |
|
The Outlander does better than most, probably class leader. I liked the tailgate too.
We were looking for the best space/efficiency compromise. The cute utes had much less space than the wagons. Mid-sized CUVs were better, but mileage went south in a hurry.
... then the CUVs have more passenger room, especially in the rear (sliding and reclining rear seats in the Outlander are very useful too). ... then higher ground clearance is another plus especially in winter time. Going back to the RX350, and particularly Toyota's 3.5L V6, the fuel economy is very good too, very close to most 2.4/2.5L I4s. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 05:08:33 pm by carcrazy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2009, 06:16:21 pm » |
|
The Outback would have been fine for my purposes in terms of cargo room. Where it failed to make the grade for me was in terms of back seat room.That's why I chose to go the CUV route. Although,truth be told,the SRX really is more of a "tall" wagon.  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 06:18:17 pm by sailor723 »
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
Sir Osis of Liver
|
|
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2009, 07:08:36 am » |
|
I can comfortably sit behind myself in the Outback so not an issue. I've also hit 7L/100kms, none of the awd CUV can touch that. It has the same ground clearance as the RAV, CRV, Escape etc. The presence of a very good manual transmission and a limited slip differential are just icing on the cake. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2009, 07:34:55 am » |
|
Funny,different people have different standards. I liked the Outback quite a lot. I just felt it needed to be an inch or two wider and have a couple of inches more rear legroom in terms of the passenger space (cargo space was fine). For me,the mid sized CUV's I looked at (like the RX350) were "just right" in this regard. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
Thinking Out Loud
Auto Obsessed
 OfflineVehicle: 2012 Jeep Sahara & 2003 Suzuki GSF600 Bandit S
Gender: 
Location: Toronto
Posts: 914
 
|
|
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2009, 08:31:56 am » |
|
There is always your Mazda 5 option......tall wagon!
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fortune favours the bold!
|
|
|
|
Bullet Blue
|
|
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2009, 10:24:41 am » |
|
Looks very Mazda CX-9ish from the rear, IMO |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sirAQUAMAN64
|
|
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2009, 10:28:43 am » |
|
I've always liked the RX, and at least Lexus has resisted the temptation to grow it. Has always appealed especially well to females size and design-wise, and should continue to.
I with the rear window rake weren't quite so strong (figure they can compete with the EX/FX/X6 coupe-like roofline with it no doubt), and that the front bumper had a little more aggression in it instead of being so plain. The interior with its full centre console gives more of a sedan impression than before. Man I hate Lexus' trim level naming convention, so confusing with each level intended to sound exquisite.
Overall, very much an evolution, that not being a bad thing. The formula continues to work.
Any pricing yet? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
