Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2009 Nissan Murano SL AWD  (Read 2297 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2738

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: October 28, 2008, 11:05:29 pm »


Test Drive:
2009 Nissan Murano SL AWD

2009 Nissan Murano SL AWDCompletely redesigned, but easily recognizable as the next-generation Murano, the '09 model offers more power and luxury at a lower price, standard AWD, and a silky smooth CV transmission - but it's not a nimble handler, says Editor-in-chief, Greg Wilson.
 More:
Read the article | View the photos | All the Test Drives
Logged
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2008, 06:24:46 am »

Quote
Braking performance, as measured by AJAC, is average. Recorded braking distance in the dry from 100 to 0 km/h is 44 metres (144 ft.).

Does anybody else find that very long?
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2008, 08:16:22 am »

Sports cars typically do this in about 120ft no?  So not bad.
Logged


quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2008, 10:00:07 am »

Sports cars typically do this in about 120ft no?  So not bad.

I think my car is 120 feet....sports cars are 100-110 and some even below 100 now.

* I'll have to find some real number to back up my opinion.
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 10:13:04 am »

So then it makes sense.  If your car is 120ft and a sports car is 100ft, an SUV at 144ft seems great when mass is substantially more.
Logged


quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2008, 10:53:07 am »

Fair enough....I just couldn't imagine driving something that takes that long to stop. I can only imagine how much further it takes when going 120-140kph!
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
sailor723
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 11 ML350 Bluetec and 11 BMW 328i xDrive
Gender: Male
Location: NB
Posts: 3378


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2008, 11:11:33 am »

Well,Motor Trend's test on the SRX came up with 122 ft from 60mph. If you assume a bit longer for the SRX from 100kmph(say,maybe high 120's?) 144 for the Murano does seem a little long to me. It would be interesting to see how that 144 number compares with some other examples of the Murano's competition.
Logged

My first ever GM ownership experience  can best be described as   "Fool me once...."
Juke1
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Nissan Juke SL AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2053

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2008, 06:03:52 am »

Quote
Braking performance, as measured by AJAC, is average. Recorded braking distance in the dry from 100 to 0 km/h is 44 metres (144 ft.).

Does anybody else find that very long?

Santa Fe comparable in size is the same.
Logged

Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. - Dale Carnegie

Diversity is not about how we differ.  Diversity is about embracing one another's uniqueness.  -Ola Joseph
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2008, 08:10:30 am »

The breaking distance seems to me to be on the long side. One note though, the distance is from 100-0 km/h which is 62-0 mph. The US magazines measure 60-0 mph.

The Outlander is 128 ft. for 60-0 mph and the tests were for the fully loaded and heavier XLS model (~3,800 lbs). The CRV and RAV4 are 128-130 ft. (3500-3700 lbs). The CX-7 is ~120 ft. at ~3900 lbs. The numbers are from memory, but they are in the ballpark for sure.

Murano’s weight varies from 4021 lbs to 4134 lbs with the tested model at 4041 lbs.
Edmunds.com tested the LE model (4,134 lbs) and recorded 122 ft for 60-0 mph.
It could be a mistake somewhere.

UPDATE: MT recorded 133 lbs. Now it's getting complicated.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 08:16:49 am by carcrazy » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 29 queries.