Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2009 Ford F-150  (Read 5136 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
tpl
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: VW GTI, Honda Fit
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph On.
Posts: 13963



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2008, 07:59:47 pm »

Firstt American car I drove was a  Avis rental, 1975 Valiant with a slant 6  from Mtl to To and back only had 1000 miles on it. Very sluggish on the way down and improved considerably coming back with a few high speed miles on it   Grin
Logged

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.
Lord Palmerston
alienc
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 8


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2008, 08:16:24 pm »

Quote
A truck you aren't afraid to get dirty or that you can't rip the running boards and body cladding off of if you try to take it anywhere a normal car wouldn't go.

GM still makes such a stripper with a V-6 and I see many construction companies using them. That said, the great majority of "truck" owners wouldn't consider getting their baby dirty to driving it up an over grown logging road. These things are big cashola.

I see they do but why 17" tires!  I guess that is another aspect I don't understand, it wasn't long ago that 16" tires were seen on Sports cars.  I think 16" wheels would make more sense on a base model, but probably because of the size of the brakes they use now they probably don't fit.  I see they dropped the 4-wheel Discs on the base model, I always wondered their reason for doing that since the rear brakes do so little of the stopping the expense of Discs on the back didn't make sense.

I see why they dropped the Manual Box due to demand but really to get any decent power with automatic you pretty much have to step up to one of the V-8's.

I guess for now I will keep driving my '93 Ranger 4-Cyl 5-spd.  It's slow but gets highway mileage similar to a mid-size car.  The gearing of the transmission in city driving kills any decent mileage.  The price to pay for it's towing ability.

Logged
smok
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 81


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: October 28, 2008, 10:29:52 am »

I am not sure if this an improvement in styling.  Looks like a big brick, very square and huge!  Driving behind this truck on the highway would double your mpg's.   Grin
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 25 queries.