Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTC Review: 2009 Mazda6 GS-I4  (Read 15268 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2741

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: September 16, 2008, 10:27:16 pm »

Day 1:

2009 Mazda6 GS-I4
Click Image to Enlarge
Zoom-zoom-zoom for me again this week -- this time, the latest zoom-zoom added to Mazda's line-up for 2009, the all new and redesigned Mazda6.  A little larger for this year, the new Mazda6 has a few design cues from the RX-8, such as the flared fenders.  My tester is a base model GS-I4 with comfort package and automatic transmission, which is likely to be the best selling version.  More...
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2008, 07:28:47 am »

STAY TUNED...Oooh will Batman avoid the Joker.....will he assume tha zoom position....i'm on tha edge of my heated SEAT and i'm not Spanish......................
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
tortoise
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2544



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2008, 07:56:24 am »

Beautiful car.  I love the interior.  But good lord, those are the ugliest wheels I've seen on a Mazda.  Ever.
Logged

Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.
bibs
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Bright's Grove
Posts: 2


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2008, 10:11:06 am »

I hate to see the rain sensing wipers forced upon the unsuspecting public. They don't work. My wife's '06 Mazda 3 has them, and they are terrible in anything but steady, warm, rain. Winter, mist, etc, they don't work worth a damn, forcing you to run the wipers at "low" speed or manually forcing one wipe at a time. So I checked the manual: "rain sensing wipers will not function properly below -10 degrees". Well, that means several weeks or months, for some!

For me a deal breaker.
Logged
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17629


If you ain't first ... you're last!


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2008, 10:26:35 am »

A deal breaker? Ummmmmmm  You turn them off and the wipers work like regular wipers -- why is this a problem?
Logged


carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2008, 11:14:17 am »

Simply the best car in the class IMO.

Logged
Feds
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Fenwick, On
Posts: 23


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2008, 11:36:26 am »

I've cross-posted this on a zillion sites, but I feel this is a rare mistake by Mazda's product planners.

When you are not the Camry or the Accord, you need to offer a compelling reason for people to get into the showrooms.  Mazda had that in the previous 6 Wagon & Hatch.  They obviously didn't sell enough to justify their existence, but the fact that they did exist was a reason for people to come look at the 6 lineup, even if they ended up with the sedan.

Now they have a car that is less distinguishable from Camry and Accord.  What reason does the average buyer have to get them to take a look at this over a CamCord?

It especially chaps my bottom as Mazda has enough of a parts bin to at least put in some distinctive powertrains.  Slot the DI turbo 4 under the V-6, make AWD optional across the board, revive your K-series V-6's.  Give people a reason to come shop you vs. the mainstays. 
Logged
sirAQUAMAN64
Board Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagen TDI Comfortline 6MT. 2009 Dodge Ram 1500 Crew Cab Sport 4X4
Gender: Male
Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
Posts: 13358



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2008, 12:21:46 pm »

I miss the passing of the hatch a great deal, but otherwise a home run for Mazda. They already seem to be advertising the sucker enough to ensure it's on people's radar.
Logged

AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!
Giant Dwarf
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 BMW 335i, '10 Mazda6 GT
Gender: Male
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 10223



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2008, 03:06:58 pm »

Bibs, like James said, if you don't like the use of the auto wipers (which, I admit, I don't in my wife's Mazda3 either), simply shut the function off.  If THIS is a deal breaker,I can't imagine you'd find a car so perfect to ever buy!

Feds, having not yet driven a new Mazda6, but read a few early reports, I believe the differentiator for the Mazda6 is still (as it was before) a comfortable, stylish, mid-size sedan that puts more emphasis on sport than do Toyota, Honda and Nissan for their respective, competitive models. 

As stated though, the loss of the hatchback and wagon, and a proper transmission with the V6 are all lamentable, but I guess the sales (or rather, lack thereof) are why these versions aren't still available.  We as consumers have nobody to blame but ourselves for not buying 'em.
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2008, 04:08:24 pm »

..having SAT in ONE...makes me an ex_spurt!! Undecided......but apart from the low headliner in the 4 Cyl wif Sun?moon /Mars?saturn ROOF...V impressive...maybe i should drive ONE before bloviating!!!??? Thinker No No hello Hide
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
Wolfe
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Miata
Gender: Male
Location: Tronno
Posts: 2806


BOO!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2008, 05:28:31 pm »

..having SAT in ONE...makes me an ex_spurt!! Undecided......but apart from the low headliner in the 4 Cyl wif Sun?moon /Mars?saturn ROOF...V impressive...maybe i should drive ONE before bloviating!!!??? Thinker No No hello Hide


Before ?!? Fall

 ROFL
Logged

To err is human, to blame it on someone else is even more human.
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2008, 05:30:53 pm »

 Grin damn ...someone still read my POSTS......    BS = Before Safristi..... Lips Sealed
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
Loudpedal
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '08 Acura TL
Gender: Male
Location: The GTA
Posts: 1945



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2008, 05:35:01 pm »

I sat in a new 6 this weekend and I too liked it, the interior especially.  The exterior might be a *tad* overstyled for this segment.

Of particular note is the housing for the exterior mirrors.  For some reason the black plastic surround (visibile when sitting in the car and looking at either the left or right mirror) is huge.   It's hard to articulate, but it's almost distracting.  James, how do you find it when driving and looking in the side view mirrors?  

Logged

Internal combustion thrust I trust
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2008, 05:48:09 pm »

Simply the best car in the class IMO.



I'll wait until I see real world fuel mileage.  Mazdas have always been disappointing in this regard.  Hopefully the new engine is better.
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
Cortina
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 1496



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2008, 06:42:39 pm »

I wonder how much of the Ford Mondeo got threw. B/C the Mazda 6 is based on the same platform as the Mondeo. So It would be very interesting to compare them side by side. But we will never get a chance here in Canadaland. Still I really like the looks. Smiley
Logged
gpws2k
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 10



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2008, 06:56:44 pm »

I wonder how much of the Ford Mondeo got threw. B/C the Mazda 6 is based on the same platform as the Mondeo. So It would be very interesting to compare them side by side.

I might be mistaken but I seem to recall reading somewhere (edmunds perhaps) that the european Mondeo platform was ditched in favour of stretching/revamping the previous generation 6 chassis in order to end up with a larger car to suit the north american market.

According to the sometimes reliable Wikipedia, the latest generation Mondeo is based on the Ford EUCD platform.  The 2009 Mazda6 is indicated as being underpinned by Ford's CD3 platform, which as I mentioned previously, is the same as the first generation car.  I'm guessing the CD in both names means they share some design aspects but the new car is definitely more closely related to the old car than anything available across the Pond.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2008, 07:35:07 pm by gpws2k » Logged

Please donate generously to the Forced Induction Outreach Program.  Help a needy 4 cylinder today.
Cortina
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 1496



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2008, 09:51:40 pm »

I wonder how much of the Ford Mondeo got threw. B/C the Mazda 6 is based on the same platform as the Mondeo. So It would be very interesting to compare them side by side.

I might be mistaken but I seem to recall reading somewhere (edmunds perhaps) that the european Mondeo platform was ditched in favour of stretching/revamping the previous generation 6 chassis in order to end up with a larger car to suit the north american market.

According to the sometimes reliable Wikipedia, the latest generation Mondeo is based on the Ford EUCD platform.  The 2009 Mazda6 is indicated as being underpinned by Ford's CD3 platform, which as I mentioned previously, is the same as the first generation car.  I'm guessing the CD in both names means they share some design aspects but the new car is definitely more closely related to the old car than anything available across the Pond.

I see now, So more Fusion.    Undecided
Logged
Mitlov
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Civic Si, 2002 Suzuki SV650; 2010 Element
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon, Obamaland
Posts: 9151


James May thinks I'm cool


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2008, 10:14:48 pm »

I see now, So more Fusion.    Undecided

The first-gen Mazda6 predated the Fusion, so I wouldn't agree that the second-gen Mazda6 is "based on the Fusion" or anything.
Logged

"Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." -- John F. Kennedy, addressing Canadian Parliament.
rrocket
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: My house
Posts: 17335



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2008, 10:19:11 pm »

^^^^"Mazda say the new second generation 2008 Mazda 6 is lighter than it’s predecessor - something that breaks the tradition of newly released cars getting heavier and heavier with every generation. The new Mazda 6 does not share a platform with the Mondeo’s EUCD platform, instead uses a revised version of first generation CD3 platform."

CD3 Platform cars:

    * 2003–present Mazda 6
    * 2006–present Ford Fusion (CD338)
    * 2006–present Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ (CD378)
    * 2006–present Mercury Milan (CD338)
    * 2007 Mazda CX-9 crossover SUV
    * 2007 Ford Edge crossover SUV (U338)
    * 2007 Lincoln MKX crossover SUV

CD3-(2) Platform Cars:

    * 2008 Mazda 6
    * 2010 Ford Fusion
    * 2010 Mercury Milan
    * 2010 Lincoln MKZ
    * 2011 Ford Edge
    * 2011 Lincoln MKX
Logged

How fast is my Supra?  I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #19 on: September 17, 2008, 11:25:31 pm »

Simply the best car in the class IMO.



I'll wait until I see real world fuel mileage.  Mazdas have always been disappointing in this regard.  Hopefully the new engine is better.

I hear you. If you go by the EPA estimates, Mazda6 I4 AT (21/30/24) is on par with the Accord (21/30/24) and Camry (21/31/25).
In real world, your mileage may vary, but this is totally true for any car. For comparison purposes however, EPA estimates are a good reference.

The reason I consider Mazda6 the best in class is that it's as good or better than the best in class in every major aspect.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 41 queries.