|
CD_Editor
|
 |
« on: August 25, 2008, 10:11:03 pm » |
|
 Test Drive:   "The SX4's tall greenhouse pays dividends in interior room," says contributor Peter Bleakney. Its standard manual transmission "snicks into gears with precision" but gas mileage is "on the high side for this class of vehicle," he says. More:Read the article | View the photos | All the Test Drives
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rrocket
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2008, 01:33:00 am » |
|
I want to like this car sooo much. But the fuel mileage isn't good enough..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
How fast is my Supra? I sh*t on Cessnas from a roll....
|
|
|
|
Honda Owner
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2008, 01:35:37 am » |
|
rrocket, you took the words right out of my mouth, or should I say the letters out of my fingers. It uses too much fuel and the lack of a folding rear seat is a huge ovesight. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
johngenx
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2008, 10:22:58 am » |
|
Add me to the list...
They really need to improve the fuel economy and get it much closer to Civic and Corolla levels. 7.9L/100km in mostly highway driving? Cripes, our Toyota stays under that in 100% stop/go commuting. Sure, it has a few more ponies, but not nearly enough to justify the added consumption.
Add the AWD from the hatch, raise the price VERY little, and it suddenly looks great... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No place I'd rather be... 
|
|
|
|
Honda Owner
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2008, 12:41:49 pm » |
|
If I flog my Fit without mercy, it gets 7.5 l / 100 km in the city. If it take it a little easier, it gets 7.0 l / 100 km. At 100 km/h, it will do 5.5 / 100 km |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
safristi
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2008, 02:27:19 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
|
|
|
|
Bullet Blue
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2008, 11:17:11 am » |
|
I agree. Cool looking car, but I don't really see any advantage of taking this over the hatch. I keep rooting for Suzuki but it's hard to when there are simply better cars out there. Hopefully they'll remedy the fuel consumption issue in the model years to follow. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PJungnitsch
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2008, 08:13:52 pm » |
|
Americans really don't like hatchback small cars, for some reason. For all the great reviews and bargain basement pricing, VW hardly sells any Rabbits in the US. The Astra has the same problem, no trunk = no sales. GM made a huge blunder by not importing the trunked version. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
johngenx
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2008, 09:07:29 pm » |
|
2-3 L/100km is more than a couple hundred bucks a year. On a 1500km road trip, that 2L/100km equates to 30L of fuel, or about $40 on one trip. Someone like me that logs 30K a year, that 2L/100km is about $750 a year, and 3L/100km is close to $1200 a year.
A hundred dollars a MONTH in fuel savings.
Gas ain't $0.50 a liter anymore... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No place I'd rather be...
|
|
|
|
|