Author Topic: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.  (Read 4682 times)

Offline articsteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: ON
  • Posts: 15055
  • Carma: +31/-163
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobbie Car: 1990 944S2
"Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« on: August 10, 2008, 12:08:18 am »
A GM fan boy must see.    I know you're out there.  :D
“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”     Billions for jets and pennies for vets; Harponi is MAGNIFICENT.

Offline tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14422
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2008, 08:38:06 am »
I will set my PVR to record this. 10pm is past my bedtime  8)

It will be interesting to see if they answer the question   "Is GM worth saving ?"
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Offline montrealvue

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Montreal,QC
  • Posts: 40
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2008, 11:22:08 am »
I will set my PVR to record this. 10pm is past my bedtime  8)

It will be interesting to see if they answer the question   "Is GM worth saving ?"
In the US GM is worth saving.  I think in Canada most could care less.....unless you live in Oshawa. :-\
I saw the last episode and it was actually better than I thought it would be.  Glad it wasn't a gloom and doom fest.  Personally, I think GM will be half the company it is now in 10 years (in North America anyway).   Lack lustre, gas guzzling poor quality vehicles is so "'90's"  ;) 

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2008, 11:25:52 am »
 Clorox Company is ahead of the GREAT G.M.. falling faster by the minute from the #1 World Corporation :'(..... it's already had it's beard shaved ...it's Private parts waxed......can we save it's B*LLS........!!!! seems some  CNBC guy KNOWS the ANSWERVER    NOT.....gonna watch synchronized womens Boxing in Bejing instead..... :stfu:
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....

Offline tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14422
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2008, 11:34:03 am »
I will set my PVR to record this. 10pm is past my bedtime  8)

It will be interesting to see if they answer the question   "Is GM worth saving ?"
In the US GM is worth saving.  I think in Canada most could care less.....unless you live in Oshawa. :-\
I saw the last episode and it was actually better than I thought it would be.  Glad it wasn't a gloom and doom fest.  Personally, I think GM will be half the company it is now in 10 years (in North America anyway).   Lack lustre, gas guzzling poor quality vehicles is so "'90's"  ;) 

More than one episode?   Oh well I have missed any previous ones.  CNBC is not a channel I ever look at.

Offline Leviathan

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Posts: 3195
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2008, 06:30:59 pm »
I think in Canada most could care less.....unless you live in Oshawa. :-\
Right. Of course. That GM economic crater will stay local to Oshawa....
Chris Matthews, CNBC: "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour"
Jon Stewart: "This guy is one scotch away from being Ron Burgundy"

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Not Hamilton
  • Posts: 6948
  • Carma: +52/-43
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2008, 09:25:13 pm »
"Is GM worth saving ?"

They saved Bear Stearns.
Everything in life is relative.

Offline allenchen

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver,BC
  • Posts: 22
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • member
    • View Profile
I think GM is making better car now. they have to save themself.
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2008, 10:34:32 pm »
I am buying a cheveolet Cobalt LT next week. I have several friends bought one already. So far they are all reliable and good on gas. Mine is $299 a month @ 0% for 72 month. almonst equiped everything except leather, skylight and premimum sound system. I test drove one, it was very quiet and fast. I like it. I am in a small town, no honda dealer around, but I checked toyota corolla, same equiped will cost me $463 a month for 72 month financing.  I like the toyota keyless entry system and push start button they are very cool. Just too expensive for me.

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Not Hamilton
  • Posts: 6948
  • Carma: +52/-43
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: I think GM is making better car now. they have to save themself.
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2008, 10:36:08 pm »
I am buying a cheveolet Cobalt LT next week. I have several friends bought one already. So far they are all reliable and good on gas. Mine is $299 a month @ 0% for 72 month. almonst equiped everything except leather, skylight and premimum sound system. I test drove one, it was very quiet and fast. I like it. I am in a small town, no honda dealer around, but I checked toyota corolla, same equiped will cost me $463 a month for 72 month financing.  I like the toyota keyless entry system and push start button they are very cool. Just too expensive for me.

It must be said, that selling cars via cheap financing doesn't make the car good, nor is it good for the balance sheet.

Offline allenchen

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver,BC
  • Posts: 22
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: I think GM is making better car now. they have to save themself.
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2008, 10:46:37 pm »
I am buying a cheveolet Cobalt LT next week. I have several friends bought one already. So far they are all reliable and good on gas. Mine is $299 a month @ 0% for 72 month. almonst equiped everything except leather, skylight and premimum sound system. I test drove one, it was very quiet and fast. I like it. I am in a small town, no honda dealer around, but I checked toyota corolla, same equiped will cost me $463 a month for 72 month financing.  I like the toyota keyless entry system and push start button they are very cool. Just too expensive for me.

It must be said, that selling cars via cheap financing doesn't make the car good, nor is it good for the balance sheet.

I agree with you about that, they have to do something to bring the customers back, if all the same price with honda or toyota,  not many people want to buy that.
Japanese car and Korean car was cheap and bad quality decades ago, they are doing the right thing now, if gm can make the right car, they will be survived.

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Not Hamilton
  • Posts: 6948
  • Carma: +52/-43
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: I think GM is making better car now. they have to save themself.
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2008, 11:19:33 pm »
I agree with you about that, they have to do something to bring the customers back, if all the same price with honda or toyota,  not many people want to buy that.
Japanese car and Korean car was cheap and bad quality decades ago, they are doing the right thing now, if gm can make the right car, they will be survived.

Repeat customers are all well and good so long as you can actually cover your costs. Giving 0% financing over six years in this "market environment" (love that term) is costing GM a lot.

I am not well versed enough in the history of the rise of Japan's or Korea's automakers to really comment intelligently on that second point, but I would imagine that GM has a lot more structural / legacy issues than Honda etc. had to deal with.

Offline Patate

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Boucherville, QC
  • Posts: 111
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: I think GM is making better car now. they have to save themself.
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2008, 04:30:34 am »
I agree with you about that, they have to do something to bring the customers back, if all the same price with honda or toyota,  not many people want to buy that.
Japanese car and Korean car was cheap and bad quality decades ago, they are doing the right thing now, if gm can make the right car, they will be survived.

Repeat customers are all well and good so long as you can actually cover your costs. Giving 0% financing over six years in this "market environment" (love that term) is costing GM a lot.

I am not well versed enough in the history of the rise of Japan's or Korea's automakers to really comment intelligently on that second point, but I would imagine that GM has a lot more structural / legacy issues than Honda etc. had to deal with.

The last paragraph IS the main problem with the Big 3.  GM's pension (PENSION ONLY, not healthcare nor salary) cost is about 2000$/car.  Now, multiply 2000 with 8 millions (about the number of cars they will sell this year) and you get 16 billions $.  This is the Big 3's reality.. they have to sell high profit margin - high volume cars to actually make money.  Until now, those sales were the trucks.  Don't fool yourselves, GM loses money by selling you that Cobalt, but they would lose even more if you didn't buy them.  They keep the factories running because it would cost even more to close them, especially since those fixed costs (pension and retired costs) would be higher per car on the remaining sales.  

It's time the Canadian and American governement do something about it.  Nevermind those conservatives who scream "free trade", it's those same guys who applaud Toyota's way without mentioning ToyHonda's hybrid program was massively financed by the Japanese governement and that their labor ethics are among the worst in any industries.  (I wanted to post some links but since I am new to those forums I cannot.. I will post later)
Worker conditions like those DO NOT BELONG IN THE 21st CENTURY.

If the whole North American people and its governements don't help their industries, they're going to go down the drain, just like the electronics industry.  Remember American TVs? Most people here weren't even born and they certainly don't know how the Japanese got into the Electronics industry... Dumping.  Just like what Hyundai did a few decades ago.  History repeats itself, and the only difference between those two industries is that the American car companies are huge corporations, they don't go bankrupt overnight.  It takes years and it will happen if we don't do something.  

Don't blame the fact that they concentrated their efforts on SUVs and Trucks, as I said earlier, High profit margins X High Volume is the only way the Big 3 can make money.  North Americans associate small cars with cheap cars, and the profit margin is too small to bear the fixed costs.
Don't blame the unions.  Those are the associations that save the middle class and the people that actually make and export products.  The desire to protect the worker's interests (as well as the union's, of course I'm not blind.. This is like a corporation) is only natural, and the public's support is essential to assure this.  They are what keep this country from becoming a 3rd world one.
The people to blame are the governements for allowing foreign products to destroy their own economy, and corporations that are pillars of good worker conditions and wages.  The public is also to blame for this.  The traitors that won't even consider buying a domestic product because "20 years ago, my Ford Tempo was a piece of :censor:" are people that should open their eyes and notice how the last domestic manufacturers are struggling.  Those people generally post messages with avatars of Asian corporations logos and they spew the same nonsense about that quality gap that really only exist now in the general public's mind . (The only gap is in the fit and finish on small cars because of the reasons mentioned above) Those ignorant people should be ashamed of themselves.

Saving GM... well hell yes we should put all our efforts into this.  I drive a Mopar.. let's say it counts :)    

Offline tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14422
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2008, 05:56:42 am »
Welcome to the Forum Patate! 

Offline toolatecrew

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Dartmouth NS
  • Posts: 2551
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2008, 09:00:45 am »
I agree with you about that, they have to do something to bring the customers back, if all the same price with honda or toyota,  not many people want to buy that.
Japanese car and Korean car was cheap and bad quality decades ago, they are doing the right thing now, if gm can make the right car, they will be survived.

Repeat customers are all well and good so long as you can actually cover your costs. Giving 0% financing over six years in this "market environment" (love that term) is costing GM a lot.

I am not well versed enough in the history of the rise of Japan's or Korea's automakers to really comment intelligently on that second point, but I would imagine that GM has a lot more structural / legacy issues than Honda etc. had to deal with.

The last paragraph IS the main problem with the Big 3.  GM's pension (PENSION ONLY, not healthcare nor salary) cost is about 2000$/car.  Now, multiply 2000 with 8 millions (about the number of cars they will sell this year) and you get 16 billions $.  This is the Big 3's reality.. they have to sell high profit margin - high volume cars to actually make money.  Until now, those sales were the trucks.  Don't fool yourselves, GM loses money by selling you that Cobalt, but they would lose even more if you didn't buy them.  They keep the factories running because it would cost even more to close them, especially since those fixed costs (pension and retired costs) would be higher per car on the remaining sales.  

It's time the Canadian and American governement do something about it.  Nevermind those conservatives who scream "free trade", it's those same guys who applaud Toyota's way without mentioning ToyHonda's hybrid program was massively financed by the Japanese governement and that their labor ethics are among the worst in any industries.  (I wanted to post some links but since I am new to those forums I cannot.. I will post later)
Worker conditions like those DO NOT BELONG IN THE 21st CENTURY.

If the whole North American people and its governements don't help their industries, they're going to go down the drain, just like the electronics industry.  Remember American TVs? Most people here weren't even born and they certainly don't know how the Japanese got into the Electronics industry... Dumping.  Just like what Hyundai did a few decades ago.  History repeats itself, and the only difference between those two industries is that the American car companies are huge corporations, they don't go bankrupt overnight.  It takes years and it will happen if we don't do something.  

Don't blame the fact that they concentrated their efforts on SUVs and Trucks, as I said earlier, High profit margins X High Volume is the only way the Big 3 can make money.  North Americans associate small cars with cheap cars, and the profit margin is too small to bear the fixed costs.
Don't blame the unions.  Those are the associations that save the middle class and the people that actually make and export products.  The desire to protect the worker's interests (as well as the union's, of course I'm not blind.. This is like a corporation) is only natural, and the public's support is essential to assure this.  They are what keep this country from becoming a 3rd world one.
The people to blame are the governements for allowing foreign products to destroy their own economy, and corporations that are pillars of good worker conditions and wages.  The public is also to blame for this.  The traitors that won't even consider buying a domestic product because "20 years ago, my Ford Tempo was a piece of :censor:" are people that should open their eyes and notice how the last domestic manufacturers are struggling.  Those people generally post messages with avatars of Asian corporations logos and they spew the same nonsense about that quality gap that really only exist now in the general public's mind . (The only gap is in the fit and finish on small cars because of the reasons mentioned above) Those ignorant people should be ashamed of themselves.

Saving GM... well hell yes we should put all our efforts into this.  I drive a Mopar.. let's say it counts :)    

So lets get this straight.

Its not the Union or GM'f fault that they lose 2000 a car due to pesion obligations its the Government's fault?

People who don't buy domestic cars are traitors?

Don't other companies manufacture cars in NA? Doesn't Honda and Toyota provide manufacturing jobs to NA workers under the same rules of saftey and working conditions as GM? How can they make a profit on small cars? It doesn't have anything to do with legacy pension and medical costs caused by GM and the Unions and NOT byt the government.

Yikes.



Offline Patate

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Boucherville, QC
  • Posts: 111
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2008, 02:15:43 pm »
 

So lets get this straight.

Its not the Union or GM'f fault that they lose 2000 a car due to pesion obligations its the Government's fault?

People who don't buy domestic cars are traitors?

Don't other companies manufacture cars in NA? Doesn't Honda and Toyota provide manufacturing jobs to NA workers under the same rules of saftey and working conditions as GM? How can they make a profit on small cars? It doesn't have anything to do with legacy pension and medical costs caused by GM and the Unions and NOT byt the government.

Yikes.



Actually, almost every manufacturing corporations get huge subventions to keep their costs down.  The best example of this here in Canada is Bombardier, that asks for lots of subventions, especially when it comes to build new plane models.  The US automakers are on their own on this, their hybrid programs are not financed by the governement, unlike the Japanese.  2 years ago, Toyota annonced their hybrid cars are profitable... well of course they are, their developpement money have been paid by someone else.    At the same time, our governements (whether they are States, provinces, etc..) keep giving money to the Japanese for creating jobs (lower paid, with almost no job security) while the Big 3's losing workers.  So YES, the governement is at fault here.

And yes, those who buy foreign products when their own corporations have huge financial problems are traitors.  This kind of behavior is not present anywhere else.
 If Toyota was close to bankruptcy, do you think the Japanese people would rush to buy the ALL NEW CHEVROLET PRIUS!! because they heard some chevy pro-environement ads on TV and radio.  Kind of funny they didn't advertize the CHEVROLET SEQUOIA at the same time don't you think?  Now what am I thinking, the Japanese couldn't buy affordable foreign cars, they're so expensive.  Know why? The yen is manipulated, and under-rated.  This makes exports very profitable and imports too expensive.

I wouldn't have a problem with the asian competition if it was fairplay, unfortunately it is not, so it is the governement's mission to ensure that it is closer to be fair. And shame on the citizens that keep their eyes closed on the economic disaster that an eventual bankrupt Big 3 would cause.


Offline ovr50

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Kelowna, BC
  • Posts: 18426
  • Carma: +9/-120
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2008, 02:21:57 pm »
Ah, Patate, you wouldn't be related to Jim Stanford, the Economist for the CAW would you??

Just curious.
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport
and
2012 Toyota Camry SE V6 in Alpine White

Offline Patate

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Boucherville, QC
  • Posts: 111
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2008, 03:09:54 pm »
Ah, Patate, you wouldn't be related to Jim Stanford, the Economist for the CAW would you??

Just curious.

Never read about him.

The truth though, is that free trade is against our interests.  Now why did we create this in the first place? Politicians' friends.. owning corporations that wanted to make their products in China.  It has never been in the interests of workers, and they are the country's middle class.  The country's economy is driven by those people. 

Imagine 10 years from now.. we have almost no more industries (America keeps the Aerospacial, pharmaceutical, weapon, industrial electronics.. those are the key industries in America), and China/India now has a middle class.  Imagine what our dollar will be worth if we don't build anything anymore and they build everything else?, I'll give you a hint, it wont be worth :censor:.  Who will want to sell us things? Remember that the US dollar is currently inflated because the 3rd world countries have an interest in selling us things.. but eventually, we will have no production left (except the key industries the US governement intends on keeping), and the people in those countries will consume their own goods.. and we will have nothing.

Offline DockMan

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: SW (Lonely Road) Ontario
  • Posts: 1799
  • Carma: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2008, 03:16:56 pm »
  Know why? The yen is manipulated, and under-rated.

Get off the pipe. It is a freely traded world currency. Spend more time watching the x-files.
Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all. - John W. Gardner

Offline toolatecrew

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Dartmouth NS
  • Posts: 2551
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2008, 03:21:54 pm »
 

So lets get this straight.

Its not the Union or GM'f fault that they lose 2000 a car due to pesion obligations its the Government's fault?

People who don't buy domestic cars are traitors?

Don't other companies manufacture cars in NA? Doesn't Honda and Toyota provide manufacturing jobs to NA workers under the same rules of saftey and working conditions as GM? How can they make a profit on small cars? It doesn't have anything to do with legacy pension and medical costs caused by GM and the Unions and NOT byt the government.

Yikes.



Actually, almost every manufacturing corporations get huge subventions to keep their costs down.  The best example of this here in Canada is Bombardier, that asks for lots of subventions, especially when it comes to build new plane models.  The US automakers are on their own on this, their hybrid programs are not financed by the governement, unlike the Japanese.  2 years ago, Toyota annonced their hybrid cars are profitable... well of course they are, their developpement money have been paid by someone else.    At the same time, our governements (whether they are States, provinces, etc..) keep giving money to the Japanese for creating jobs (lower paid, with almost no job security) while the Big 3's losing workers.  So YES, the governement is at fault here.

And yes, those who buy foreign products when their own corporations have huge financial problems are traitors.  This kind of behavior is not present anywhere else.
 If Toyota was close to bankruptcy, do you think the Japanese people would rush to buy the ALL NEW CHEVROLET PRIUS!! because they heard some chevy pro-environement ads on TV and radio.  Kind of funny they didn't advertize the CHEVROLET SEQUOIA at the same time don't you think?  Now what am I thinking, the Japanese couldn't buy affordable foreign cars, they're so expensive.  Know why? The yen is manipulated, and under-rated.  This makes exports very profitable and imports too expensive.

I wouldn't have a problem with the asian competition if it was fairplay, unfortunately it is not, so it is the governement's mission to ensure that it is closer to be fair. And shame on the citizens that keep their eyes closed on the economic disaster that an eventual bankrupt Big 3 would cause.



you did not answer the question.

Its not the Union or GM'f fault that they lose 2000 a car due to pesion obligations its the Government's fault?

How do government trade practices impact the pension and benifits hole that GM and the unions caused?

Taritors? So the Canadian and North American people should buy more big 3 cars becuase the Big 3 made huge mistakes? ? rediculous.

Hey look at the top selling cars in China in Nov 08
Santana - 19,300 cars sold
Buick Excelle - 18,500
VW Jetta - 17,300
Corolla - 16,500
Camry - 16,400
Buick and Vw !! What a bunch of traitors.

Offline ovr50

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Kelowna, BC
  • Posts: 18426
  • Carma: +9/-120
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: "Saving GM" CNBC tonight @ 10:00 p.m.
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2008, 03:30:20 pm »
Ah, Patate, you wouldn't be related to Jim Stanford, the Economist for the CAW would you??

Just curious.

Never read about him.

The truth though, is that free trade is against our interests.  Now why did we create this in the first place? Politicians' friends.. owning corporations that wanted to make their products in China.  It has never been in the interests of workers, and they are the country's middle class.  The country's economy is driven by those people. 

Imagine 10 years from now.. we have almost no more industries (America keeps the Aerospacial, pharmaceutical, weapon, industrial electronics.. those are the key industries in America), and China/India now has a middle class.  Imagine what our dollar will be worth if we don't build anything anymore and they build everything else?, I'll give you a hint, it wont be worth :censor:.  Who will want to sell us things? Remember that the US dollar is currently inflated because the 3rd world countries have an interest in selling us things.. but eventually, we will have no production left (except the key industries the US governement intends on keeping), and the people in those countries will consume their own goods.. and we will have nothing.

Oh, boy, another union-led, anti-free-trade advocate.  ::) ::)

I happen to disagree but I'll be damned if I'm going to spend time on an internet car forum arguing the pros & cons of the NAFTA. I leave that to others with more time and inclination to do so.

 :P