Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTC Review: 2009 Dodge Journey  (Read 16563 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14916



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #40 on: July 30, 2008, 05:06:21 pm »

Quote
ALERT!!! Enviro-crazie at large!!! ALERT!!!  Roll Eyes

In the absence of either reason or skills to reason, name calling is preferred some and condoned by many. 

Too bad that this conduct does nothing to reduce the grief and hopelessness that other fellow Canadians are going through at the gas pump.  
So sad it is.
Gas is still cheaper then cup of coffee at Timmys, or at Starbucks
If you need the product you have pay the going rate
Logged
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #41 on: July 30, 2008, 05:21:11 pm »

The difference is 0.6L/100km.

The Journey is so slow I found it unbearable at times.  For me 0.6L/100km is nothing, that's 75 cents over 100km. 



+1.

An I4 engine in a vehicle this big and heavy doesn't make any sense. The minor fuel economy gain (if at all) is not enough to offset the huge loss in driving experience. Load this vehicle up with four adults and gear and go to the cottage ... or not.

I see this combination more and more as a marketing gimmick – smaller engine with better fuel economy… Yeah right!
Logged
Schmengie
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: The Oaken Noggin
Posts: 1724



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #42 on: July 30, 2008, 05:30:49 pm »

Gas is still cheaper then cup of coffee at Timmys, or at Starbucks
If you need the product you have pay the going rate


Not quite an accurate analogy, unless you drink 40 or 50 liters of Starbucks at a time.
As for paying the going rate, who has a choice? You either do or you don't, but I take Analagous' point that today's gas prices hurt those who can least afford them.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2008, 05:35:50 pm by Schmengie » Logged

' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson
Analogous
Guest

« Reply #43 on: July 31, 2008, 08:38:04 am »


I know many here like to place emphasis on power and speed and in the end you help promote something to Canadians that is not very good in the long run.  As I type this I am reminded that my husband is no longer employed because of the GM plant closures in Ontario and now we are even thinking of moving back to his home province because now the only way he can do some work is by driving far and often.  Just looking for work hurts a lot in gas costs alone all the while trying to make ends meet with little money.  Even with the little I know about cars I see 10 L/100km is not good and only in our country would that look OK for some.

So I urge you to think about those canadians whose stress at the pump is only made worse by the the cars and trucks you promote on a regular basis.  They might have been fine or ok at one point but at the moment and going forward they amount to nothing but insensitive advice that digs us further and deeper into the mess many families are in.

I don't speak as an environmentalist and I am appalled at the cruelty that some here resort to protect their likes.  I speak as somebody who has no choice but to make life changing sacrifices to make ends meet and almost all the families that were impacted by the plant closures have a similar story to tell. We drove the cars our loved ones assembled and they were the wrong cars.
If you really love cars, my advice to all is that you start putting a little more effort into the cars we should have been building.  Maybe trucks and vans were never right for many canadian families like mine but the quest for more power and waste made that look good and that has to stop for the sake of many.

God bless you all.
Logged
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6681


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #44 on: July 31, 2008, 10:25:40 am »

^^^  You have some good points but you missed the most important one. People are free to choose what vehicle they want to drive. CTC does not brain wash their readers into buying the cars they review. If somebody bought a gas guzzling pig of a SUV 2 years ago because gas was cheap....suck it up. What did you think would happen?
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
inco
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Explorer XLT 4WD, 2011 Subaru Forester Touring
Gender: Male
Location: Ontaaaarrrrio
Posts: 6796


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #45 on: July 31, 2008, 04:04:31 pm »

I'm sorry that the job is gone and the plant is going through change. but look at it as a chance to go out and try something different and new.

People lose their jobs every day for many different reasons but what they do about is the character or fibre that they are made up of to go out and start again. Winners  do that.

Life isn't always fair and lots of things go wrong - sickness, diseases, storms, layoffs and even deaths of loved ones. Can't avoid everything. Having a good mental attitude and understanding that some things we cannot control goes a long way to helping us get through the tough times.

Now it's your opportunity and good luck.,
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #46 on: July 31, 2008, 04:36:46 pm »

 Huh... Ya BLEW the $100,000 already..... Thinker No No Bang
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #47 on: July 31, 2008, 08:52:44 pm »


I know many here like to place emphasis on power and speed and in the end you help promote something to Canadians that is not very good in the long run.  As I type this I am reminded that my husband is no longer employed because of the GM plant closures in Ontario and now we are even thinking of moving back to his home province because now the only way he can do some work is by driving far and often.  Just looking for work hurts a lot in gas costs alone all the while trying to make ends meet with little money.  Even with the little I know about cars I see 10 L/100km is not good and only in our country would that look OK for some.

So I urge you to think about those canadians whose stress at the pump is only made worse by the the cars and trucks you promote on a regular basis.  They might have been fine or ok at one point but at the moment and going forward they amount to nothing but insensitive advice that digs us further and deeper into the mess many families are in.

I don't speak as an environmentalist and I am appalled at the cruelty that some here resort to protect their likes.  I speak as somebody who has no choice but to make life changing sacrifices to make ends meet and almost all the families that were impacted by the plant closures have a similar story to tell. We drove the cars our loved ones assembled and they were the wrong cars.
If you really love cars, my advice to all is that you start putting a little more effort into the cars we should have been building.  Maybe trucks and vans were never right for many canadian families like mine but the quest for more power and waste made that look good and that has to stop for the sake of many.

God bless you all.


Try working in the mining industry where we live and die on free market pricing with frequent boom and bust cycles. When operations shut down we pack up and move on without crying to the government for handouts to save our jobs. Suck it up.
Logged

airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14916



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #48 on: July 31, 2008, 09:53:35 pm »

opps http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=28bbd45d-e33c-4277-88bf-9c7ba2711b74
Applications are now being accepted under the $1.2 million-a-year

Prospector and Corporation Exploration Incentive Programs. Through the

programs, prospectors may receive up to 50 per cent of eligible

expenditures to a maximum of $7,500 and exploration corporations may

receive up to 25 per cent of eligible expenditures to a maximum of $100,000

on approved projects.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 30 queries.