Author Topic: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005  (Read 9988 times)

Offline xviper

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2008, 02:00:59 pm »
There used to be a marvelous little "gif" file of an Aztek just sitting there, minding its own business, then suddenly bursting into flames, becoming a pile of charcoal on the ground.  Someone captioned it to say something to the effect, "The best part of an Aztek".
If anyone has it, you should post it here.

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Lethbridge, AB
  • Posts: 2925
  • Carma: +18/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2008, 12:06:13 am »
Quote
The camp-in-the-back idea is neat, but a) any serious camper will likely want better off-road performance than this offers, and b) any recreational camper is not going to be seen in such an ugly vehicle to have the privilege of having their tent attached to their car when they go camping twice a year.

I always wondered about the practicality of that tent thing. If you are going camping in this thing wouldn't it be full of all your camping gear? So then if you intend to have two people sleep in the vehicle what do you do with all your stuff, just pitch it outside?

I've been wondering a similar thing.  What is the point of having the tent attached to the car?  What happens during the day, when you want/need to go out exploring, getting supplies, etc, and need to take the vehicle?

seems better to fold down the back seats and sleep in a minivan

Offline auto_enthusiast

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 349
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2008, 01:02:06 am »
One Aztek I woulnd't mind driving (it even looks good!)






2003 PONTIAC ULTIMATE AZTEK
ON SALE: Never
BASE PRICE: Enormous
POWERTRAIN: 7.0-liter, 665-hp, 625-lb-ft V8; rwd, six-speed manual
0-60 MPH: Omygawd, it's real, real fast



A spec sheet sent to us lists Reuss and Co.’s project as the “Ultimate Aztek,” so that’s what we’ll call it. Essentially, it’s a race car-cum-Pontiac-Vibe on steroids.

Above the beltline, the truck is true to Aztek heritage, although the origami rear end has been angled downward, rounded out a bit and fitted with a new spoiler. Door handles, mirrors and front fascia also get fittingly refashioned.

Flared fenders swoop over the wheel wells —complete with gill-slit vents—and positively dominate the design. Twenty-two-inch rims and 295/25 Z-rated treads fill the wells and two pairs of four-inch exhaust tips emerge ahead of the rear wells. Below the grille, a pair of fog lights bookend a lemon-wedge screen behind which sits a C5 racing radiator and other modifications.

All this bodywork does a lot to address the tippy-tall disproportion of the original design, but it is those other modifications that are really what’s worth getting giddy over.



The Ultimate’s firewall has been moved and Reuss ripped out all underhood nonessentials in order to fit the same 7.0-liter aluminum pushrod V8 that powers the C5-R in the cradle. In this case, output was wrenched up to 665 hp with torque at 625 lb-ft. Torque pushes at or near its peak through an intoxicating if straight curve starting at about 4000 rpm through 6800. Air is funneled to the engine through dual tapered conical filters lending the engine bay the same comic, come-get-me invitation as those Dolce & Gabbana bras gave Madonna during her infamous Girlie Show Tour.

Acceleration inspires an eruption of sound and plenty of cabin vibration, as well it should. A modified instrument cluster includes “pro series” gauges for oil pressure, water temperature, volts, speed and engine rpm. Virtually everything else inside you would operate or touch is custom, including front racing seats, abbreviated rear bench, carpet, racing-grade shifter and wheel, and the necessary plethora of “don’t touch without asking” switches. Sorry, no radio, a/c or cupholders. If a six-point roll cage and racing belts don’t convince occupants that this Aztek is for real, nothing will.

A modified six-speed manual with a heavy-duty clutch is mated to the engine, sending power solely to the rear wheels. You really have to thread your way through clutch engagement and be attentive or stalling is inevitable. A bit of jerking is to be expected; we didn’t stall, but we stunk up the cabin once with burning clutch odors. Once was enough. Another smell you’ll encounter is that of 100 octane fuel, required and distributed via a high-pressure fuel pump and racing-type fuel cell.

To further the Le Mans-wolf-in-Aztek-clothing argument, consider the remaining spec sheet. The 36-inch power rack-and-pinion, again heavy-duty, is fitted with steering arm adapters to allow the use of spherical rod ends in place of standard tie rods. Front suspension is a C5 double-wishbone setup with polyurethane bushings, while rear is five-link with adjustable coil-over triple adjustable shocks. Modular antiroll bar assemblies dress the front and rear, as do a pair of 2.5-inch diameter coil springs. There is no official word on how much this thing is lowered, but even the gravel road to your summer cabin is out of the question.

Of course we asked about the potential of ever seeing anything remotely close to this put in production, and Reuss calmed our fears by saying, “None.” Still, we wouldn’t mind seeing this little model pace a lap or two, just for the giggle factor. After that, we’d be content to see the word “ultimate” applied in its other sense: last of a series.

Offline xviper

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #23 on: May 31, 2008, 01:17:00 am »
Anyone remember when Daily Planet featured that rocket powered outhouse?  It doesn't matter how much power you strap onto it or how frilly you make it look.  It's still an outhouse.

Offline Schmengie

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: The Oaken Noggin
  • Posts: 1770
  • Carma: +3/-1
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2008, 05:48:03 pm »
Since this thread was posted, I've been seeing more and more of these, these THINGS! HELP!!! :popo:
' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson

Offline Zoo

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Guelph, Ontario
  • Posts: 984
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Always hungry..
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2008, 06:08:39 pm »
A neighbour of mine has a yellow Aztek. Thankfully they have moved and I don't have to see this eyesore anymore. I think the thing was bringing down the house values on my street! :rofl2:

Seriously though... What was Pontiac thinking? ???

Offline xviper

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2008, 06:27:26 pm »
I think GM used the Aztek platform for the Rendevous, so the Aztek hasn't really left us.  It's just in another form.

Offline Zoo

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Guelph, Ontario
  • Posts: 984
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Always hungry..
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2008, 07:53:07 pm »
I think GM used the Aztek platform for the Rendevous, so the Aztek hasn't really left us.  It's just in another form.

Now call me crazy but... I actually like the look of the Buick Rendezvous. The rear lights are a bit on the large side but all in all it is a pretty harmonious design.

Offline Wolfe

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Tronno
  • Posts: 2806
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • BOO!
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #28 on: June 01, 2008, 12:50:54 am »
I think GM used the Aztek platform for the Rendevous, so the Aztek hasn't really left us.  It's just in another form.

The Buick Rendezvous was discontinued (along with the Ranier and Terraza) last year when the Enclave came out.


To err is human, to blame it on someone else is even more human.

Offline xviper

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #29 on: June 01, 2008, 01:41:41 am »
The Buick Rendezvous was discontinued (along with the Ranier and Terraza) last year when the Enclave came out.
So it continued for a couple of years after the Aztek?  Did it take the buying public 2 years to figure out what was under those things?

Offline Schmengie

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: The Oaken Noggin
  • Posts: 1770
  • Carma: +3/-1
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #30 on: June 01, 2008, 02:39:01 am »
I think GM used the Aztek platform for the Rendevous, so the Aztek hasn't really left us.  It's just in another form.

Now call me crazy but... I actually like the look of the Buick Rendezvous. The rear lights are a bit on the large side but all in all it is a pretty harmonious design.

OK, you're crazy! :stick: The Rendezvous isn't nearly as butt-ugly as the Aztec, but harmonious? I guess that makes the AMC Pacer a design classic, eh?  ;D

Offline xviper

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #31 on: June 01, 2008, 10:36:36 am »
Didn't Tiger Woods pitch the Rendevous?  He can sell anything.

Offline Zoo

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Guelph, Ontario
  • Posts: 984
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Always hungry..
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #32 on: June 01, 2008, 11:05:44 am »
I think GM used the Aztek platform for the Rendevous, so the Aztek hasn't really left us.  It's just in another form.

Now call me crazy but... I actually like the look of the Buick Rendezvous. The rear lights are a bit on the large side but all in all it is a pretty harmonious design.

OK, you're crazy! :stick: The Rendezvous isn't nearly as butt-ugly as the Aztec, but harmonious? I guess that makes the AMC Pacer a design classic, eh?  ;D

The Pacer isn't considered a classic? :D

Okay maybe I overstated my point; but I never thought the Rendezvous was ugly. GM did a good job badge engineering the Rendezvous to make it look more sophisticated than the Aztec.

We should start a thread on some of the worst conceived vehicles ever made. We could list the Edsel, Aztec, Subaru Baja and go from there....

Offline dr_spock

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Canada
  • Posts: 10568
  • Carma: +10/-4
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #33 on: June 01, 2008, 11:17:57 am »

There are 4 or so Rendezvous on my little street.  People in my hood seems to like them over minivans.


Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #34 on: June 01, 2008, 12:45:24 pm »
..HOW MUCH... :shuffle:...fer a BIG BROWN BAG???????

.................
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....

Offline gottarondo

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
  • Posts: 534
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #35 on: June 04, 2008, 12:16:06 pm »
We should start a thread on some of the worst conceived vehicles ever made. We could list the Edsel, Aztec, Subaru Baja and go from there....

A vehicle I'd never seen before caught my eye yesterday and I found myself looking for one of those brown paper bags as I thought "what on earth is THAT monstrosity?"  So I'd add it to your list, Zoo:  The BMW X6.  I suppose it might have a performance and reliability edge over the Aztec, which some people might think would be adequate compensation for its looks. 

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #36 on: June 04, 2008, 04:01:09 pm »
 ::) ??? Tiger Woods pitched a Rendezvous...I wooda used a NEIN IRON..... :P  FORE....................nicators tha lotta U..... :D

Offline Greg B.

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Dartmouth, NS
  • Posts: 567
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #37 on: June 04, 2008, 07:53:32 pm »
It's hideous.  Reliability is poor.  The only redeeming quality is that you can get one for cheap?

I'll take a pass, thanks.  Oh, and speaking of pass, please pass the eye-bleach...

Oh, don't be so quick to judge. There are a number of advantages ot an Aztek, if you think outside the box. Back 7 or 8 years ago I posted the following on Edmunds.com. It still holds true today:

"So I got to thinking, what are the advantages to Aztek ownership? I found a surprising number. Maybe you can add more. But if you own an Aztek you enjoy:

1. No problem finding your vehicle in crowded parking lots. Not only is it visually obvious, but no one will park within 3 spots of you.
2. Theft insurance premium waived by insurance company.
3. Pontiac dealer not only adds you to Christmas card list, but will be eternally grateful for taking it off the lot as long as you don't try to trade it in a few years down the road.
4. No need for costly washing, waxing and maintenance to protect resale value, since there is none.
5. No need for costly Viper anti theft security system.
6. You can explain away door dings and minor accident damage as factory "styling" feature."

 ;D

Offline The Mighty Duck

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Kingston, ON
  • Posts: 7194
  • Carma: +14/-8
  • Gender: Male
  • f*** that duck
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Honda Fit
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #38 on: June 04, 2008, 08:51:36 pm »
We should start a thread on some of the worst conceived vehicles ever made. We could list the Edsel, Aztec, Subaru Baja and go from there....

I thought the Baja was a very cleverly conceived vehicle, albeit one with a fairly limited market segment.  There are people who require the flexibility of a truck box without the accompanying need for high power or an eight-foot box.  My father is one of them - our truck box is always stuffed with something, but we are far from needing an F150 or RAM-sized vehicle.  A Baja would have been very well suited to our needs...

Offline 1TSX

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: London, Ontario
  • Posts: 3311
  • Carma: +28/-26
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Pontiac Aztek, 2001-2005
« Reply #39 on: June 04, 2008, 09:02:08 pm »
We should start a thread on some of the worst conceived vehicles ever made. We could list the Edsel, Aztec, Subaru Baja and go from there....

I thought the Baja was a very cleverly conceived vehicle, albeit one with a fairly limited market segment.  There are people who require the flexibility of a truck box without the accompanying need for high power or an eight-foot box.  My father is one of them - our truck box is always stuffed with something, but we are far from needing an F150 or RAM-sized vehicle.  A Baja would have been very well suited to our needs...

The Baja was a 4 seater too. That limited family appeal.
Mine: 2004 Acura TSX
Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i