|
CD_Editor
|
 |
« on: April 23, 2008, 11:03:29 pm » |
|
 Used Vehicle Review:   Though the Cadillac SRX crossover hasn't proven as reliable as the CTS sedan on which it is based, it's "about mid-pack in the luxury SUV field," says Contributing Editor, Chris Chase. "Brutal" depreciation means used examples are relatively cheap, he says. Read the article | View the photos | All The Used Vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ktm525
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2008, 12:10:04 pm » |
|
V8, AWD, Magnaride shock absorbers make for a very entertaining drive.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Mighty Duck
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2008, 12:29:20 pm » |
|
I love the looks of the SRX... this and the Murano are probably the most unique CUVs on the market. I think I like the SRX a little better, though.  The problems with the sunroof scare me a little, though... shattering for no reason?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
|
|
|
|
ktm525
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2008, 01:16:38 pm » |
|
Will the SRX be doomed with the arrival of the CTW? A CTS based wagon? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2008, 08:10:08 pm » |
|
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
jcon
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2008, 09:10:22 pm » |
|
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better.
How many times has the sunroof spontaneously combusted on you?   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2008, 05:01:44 am » |
|
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better.
How many times has the sunroof spontaneously combusted on you? So far so good....after two months I've even given up wearing the helmet and safety goggles.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
Scaerio
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2008, 09:37:21 am » |
|
I think the SRX is the best looking of all of these luxury crossovers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
-Ken
SAAB: automobile design inspired by Salvador Dali on an absinthe bender.
|
|
|
|
Leviathan
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2008, 12:21:42 pm » |
|
Saw one on the way to work yesterday and thought it was pretty nice looking. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Chris Matthews, CNBC: "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour"
Jon Stewart: "This guy is one scotch away from being Ron Burgundy"
|
|
|
|
|
|
BJB
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2008, 12:33:46 pm » |
|
I think it's good looking until you get the rear quarter, the back of this vehicle just looks so damn disjointed to me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ktm525
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2008, 12:58:19 pm » |
|
I think it's good looking until you get the rear quarter, the back of this vehicle just looks so damn disjointed to me.
I agree. Nice face, shame about the a$$. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
safristi
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2008, 01:10:01 pm » |
|
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !! man thats something......!!! ? but what.  ..a Bargoon or a fools paradise............  ..friend in the States has a second hand Escalade and is bummed at the "whole" experience...the SRX..is a tad behind the 8 ball on the "downsizing"...wot with gas in the USofA @ $3.59 fer their weenie GALLON  ........... I imagine they would be a hoot with 4 golfing buddies onna Hi_Way trip south..but otherwise kinda expensive as a grocery getter..but wotta deal........DE-PREC-I+ATION is drivin me wild...next best thing to sliced Bison bits & Compound Interest..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
|
|
|
|
airbalancer
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2008, 01:47:17 pm » |
|
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !! man thats something......!!! ? but what. ..a Bargoon or a fools paradise............ ..friend in the States has a second hand Escalade and is bummed at the "whole" experience...the SRX..is a tad behind the 8 ball on the "downsizing"...wot with gas in the USofA @ $3.59 fer their weenie GALLON ........... I imagine they would be a hoot with 4 golfing buddies onna Hi_Way trip south..but otherwise kinda expensive as a grocery getter..but wotta deal........DE-PREC-I+ATION is drivin me wild...next best thing to sliced Bison bits & Compound Interest..... It has about the same mileage as any other SUV/CUV in the same class I would look at one used but not new, GM does have a good warranty on it, Also there is usually a Caddy dealer close by, not like the other luxuryury brands where it could be a couple hour drive for service |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cord
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2008, 02:11:59 pm » |
|
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !! I wouldn't get too excited by the depreciation figures in that article. Real life depreciation on any vehicle is never quite as bad as these reported red book figures. A quick search on Autotrader of 2004 SRXs showed that out of 42 available (outside of Ontario), only seven are priced at $19999 or less. And of course, a 2004 model could've been purchased in 2003 which could make it almost 5 years old. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
safristi
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2008, 03:12:21 pm » |
|
IT is the 2005's the article lists as $22K Now...$59K NEW.........   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
|
|
|
|
ktm525
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2008, 03:16:22 pm » |
|
But no one bought these new for anywhere close to MSRP. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cord
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2008, 06:10:49 pm » |
|
IT is the 2005's the article lists as $22K Now...$59K NEW......... Sheesh, do I have to fill in all the blanks? You're the one stating $60K to $20K depreciation in 3.5 years. Okay, so doing the same search for 2005s shows 27 available, one of which is $21995 with next cheapest being $24998. Must be some special math that comes up with $22K as average retail. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 25, 2008, 06:12:47 pm by Cord »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sailor723
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2008, 07:17:21 pm » |
|
Don't forget dealers/brokers have brought in a lot of high end late model used cars such as these from the US in the last year. I don't know what an 05 V6 AWD listed for in the US but I bet it was around 40K. I wonder if the US imports may have depressed the used values in this market segment and caused the depreciation to seem overly large? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My first ever GM ownership experience can best be described as "Fool me once...."
|
|
|
|
safristi
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2008, 01:52:54 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
|
|
|
|
Cord
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2008, 02:08:54 pm » |
|
I was taking it up with the author. You're the one that misread the frickin' article. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
