Jil Mcintosh seems to have a soft spot for the Sprinter, and I happen to agree with her. I don't own one, but the couple of times a year that I need a large vehicle for household stuff I call the only place in town that rents them and book a Sprinter. If they don't have one available the day I need it I simply reschedule my work for a day that they do have one. I agree with McIntosh in all her praise of the vehicle. It is powerful yet fuel-efficient, huge yet very easy to drive. I'm a big fan of diesel engines so this just seems like the right choice. I think it says a lot about the U.S. rejection of diesels that they have a gas engine option.
One thing that McIntosh didn't mention, and maybe out of courtesy, was how the Sprinter compares to the Ford E-Series or the GM twins. It's been a while since I drove a GM van, but the last time I drove a Ford wasn't too long ago. Not that the length of time matters: both of those designs are decades old - and it shows. They are heavy and cumbersome, the fuel economy is poor, and the utility is poor when compared to a Sprinter. After working in the back loading an E-Series the stand-up room of a Sprinter is a welcome gift to my 40-something back. And get this - the folks who designed the Sprinter seemed to think that someone may actually want to carry something in the cavernous cargo area so they have tie-downs. To tie stuff in the E-Series you're hooking to and through sidewall frame members.
As for fuel economy, as they say, you're mileage may vary. I've never hit the consumption that McIntosh did, but she admitted to carrying a large, heavy load. One trip I averaged 10 litres per 100km, which was amazing. Most recently it was a little over 12, which is still amazing.
Overall, the Sprinter is a great vehicle that looks exceptional when compared to the competition.