Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2010 Kia Soul  (Read 5290 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Schmengie
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: The Oaken Noggin
Posts: 1724



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2009, 08:06:30 pm »

^^The Cube too.  It's on the Versa platform.  Though I don't think it's a cool as the Soul.


 I think I probably would've bought a Cube instead of the Versa if they were available. To me, it's a toss-up as to which has the highest cool-factor, but AFAIK the Cube isn't sold here yet, so it's not really in the equation. If the Soul is as successful as I think it's going to be, hopefully other manufacturers will jump into the fray.
Logged

' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2009, 11:20:28 pm »

Every time I see these new cars, mind you entry-level, coming with 4-speed A/T I keep asking how much more expensive would be to put a 5-speed in? Honda does it and Ford will even have a dual-clutch in the new Fiesta. Don't they read the news? It’s not like they have to design a new transmission from scratch because they already have it in other vehicles.

How much more expensive would be to put a telescopic steering wheel in? I don’t understand the manufacturers that go cheap where they shouldn’t (Kia is not the only one though).

Does anyone know if the rear suspension is independent or torsion beam?
I noticed that Kia went out of their way and use 4-disc brakes on higher trims versus the rear drums usual for this class.

It's an interesting vehicle and with an optional AWD it would be even better. It’s nicer than the Cube, Scion and Element IMO.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 08:36:10 am by carcrazy » Logged
Thinking Out Loud
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2012 Jeep Sahara & 2003 Suzuki GSF600 Bandit S
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 915


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2009, 07:37:33 am »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....
Logged

Fortune favours the bold!
Rupert
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 981

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2009, 08:08:10 am »

I don't know about telescopic stearing...I have never had a car with that feature and never felt the need for it...whatever. All singing and dancing drive though is exactly what this segment does not need. People buy A/4 WD that have no need whatever for such a feature just because it is there. It's a reasonably low cost (not very low) small neat vehicle and in a time when ones house is being forcibly checked for draughts by the government, what we need is to add 10/15% to the gas consumption of what might be a high volume sales vehicle...I don't think so. Keep it simple Kia/Hyundai, your doing alright.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 08:38:46 am by Rupert » Logged
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2009, 10:15:54 am »

"People buy A/4 WD that have no need whatever for such a feature just because it is there."

... And some people buy the 4WD because they know they will benefit from the system when needed. Being OPTIONAL it should make both type of buyers happy.

Logged
Rupert
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 981

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2009, 10:38:36 am »

They should concentrate on developing the base product...sound damping if it is needed...everyone can benefit from that all of the time. There are lots of specialty vehicles that have 4/all. Making it a feature of every sector is silly IMO. Keep it on message.
Logged
carcrazy
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 4023

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2009, 10:56:57 am »

I agree that AWD should not be offered on every car, but to me, the Soul looks like it could be a very sensible urban utility vehicle. It's boxy which gives it a very decent cargo and relatively high off the ground, etc. An AWD option (on higher trims eventually) would round up the package for those living in urban areas (e.g. Toronto) where the side streets get plowed days after the snow storms. I do not associate the 4WD with off-roading.

I'm not saying that the 4WD should be a must on the Soul, but a nice to have option. The telescopic steering wheel and 5AT should be a must in my opinion on any newly designed car, regardless of class.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 11:03:46 am by carcrazy » Logged
DockMan
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru WRX
Gender: Male
Location: SW (Lonely Road) Ontario
Posts: 1799



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: February 24, 2009, 11:09:14 am »

 I Agree
Logged

Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all. - John W. Gardner
Schmengie
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: The Oaken Noggin
Posts: 1724



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: February 24, 2009, 12:42:08 pm »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....

I think the differences are too significant to put the Soul into the same category as the PT/HHR, which are basically retro-styled vehicles intended to recall the cars and trucks of a long time ago . Both of them are based on existing platforms and drivetrains.

The Soul on the other hand at least looks like a clean-sheet design, thoroughly modern in design. It's a lot closer to my Versa size-wise than the Element which is really a CUV.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 12:48:20 pm by Schmengie » Logged

' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson
Winklovic
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Chrysler Sebring LX, 17.86@77.61 mph
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 2789



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: February 24, 2009, 01:07:34 pm »

For some strange reason I thought I would keep my Sebring until I retired (14 years to go).  There's no way that'll happen since there's so many interesting vehicles becoming available, the Soul included.
Logged

airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14916



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: February 24, 2009, 01:52:17 pm »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....
Huh
Honda element Production 2003–present
 Hurl
PT Production 2001-2009
Logged
Wolverine
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Ford Focus Sedan 07/08 1.6L Flex Fuel
Gender: Male
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1686



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: February 24, 2009, 03:09:20 pm »

This is one fine looking small runner, Kia has done some great cars lately, the Cerato for instance, is a great looking car with a ton of standard equipments for a right price.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 03:13:34 pm by Wolverine » Logged

"If you wanna make the world a better place take a look at yourself and make a change."
Scaerio
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Renault Clio, 2005 Suzuki Aerio (in storage)
Gender: Male
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3951



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2009, 09:18:10 am »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves.

Isn't the Jeep Patriot pretty much a "car like this," and one that offers an AWD option to boot?
Logged

-Ken

SAAB: automobile design inspired by Salvador Dali on an absinthe bender.
random006
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2003 Kia Sorento EX
Gender: Male
Location: Montreal, QC.
Posts: 4930



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2009, 10:48:24 am »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....

I think the differences are too significant to put the Soul into the same category as the PT/HHR, which are basically retro-styled vehicles intended to recall the cars and trucks of a long time ago . Both of them are based on existing platforms and drivetrains.

The Soul on the other hand at least looks like a clean-sheet design, thoroughly modern in design. It's a lot closer to my Versa size-wise than the Element which is really a CUV.

According to the article, it is based on the Kia Rio.  I will admit that it's hard to tell, though.
Logged
Schmengie
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Versa
Location: The Oaken Noggin
Posts: 1724



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2009, 03:26:59 am »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....

I think the differences are too significant to put the Soul into the same category as the PT/HHR, which are basically retro-styled vehicles intended to recall the cars and trucks of a long time ago . Both of them are based on existing platforms and drivetrains.

The Soul on the other hand at least looks like a clean-sheet design, thoroughly modern in design. It's a lot closer to my Versa size-wise than the Element which is really a CUV.

According to the article, it is based on the Kia Rio.  I will admit that it's hard to tell, though.

Well, I saw my first Soul today. It's in a totally different size category than the tiny Rio and a lot bigger than I expected, that's for sure. The hood and rooflines are so much higher than the Rio's that it's hard to believe they have anything in common at all. It's a really great looking car, even more so in the metal. Kia's gonna sell a ton of these. Thumbs up
Logged

' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson
Thinking Out Loud
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2012 Jeep Sahara & 2003 Suzuki GSF600 Bandit S
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 915


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2009, 06:24:30 am »

Wow, talk about the right car at the right time. I hope the bozos at GM and Chrysler are simmering in a stew of jealousy and angst that they couldn't come up with a car like the Soul themselves. The styling, the size, the price, the practicality, I could go on and on - without actually seeing one, everything about this car seems as close to perfect as a small car can get. I think the Soul is going to be a huge hit for Kia.  Thumbs up  Can't wait to see one in the metal.

Actually, Chrysler thinks they started the funky-car craze with the PTCrus-eon and GM got all-original with the HHRbalt.   Wink

Hats off to the Element for kicking this segment off....
Huh
Honda element Production 2003–present
 Hurl
PT Production 2001-2009

Sorry - I meant the unusual cube/box on wheels design in N/A...
Logged

Fortune favours the bold!
Rupert
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 981

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #36 on: March 05, 2009, 10:58:01 am »

If it's that high then making the seat backs flat when folded should not be too difficult. It's not a deal breaker but flat hard seat backs is a nice feature and looks more finished.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 39 queries.