Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickup  (Read 4922 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2732

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: January 22, 2008, 10:16:52 pm »



Test Drive:
2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickup

2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickupAvailable only in an extended-cab bodystyle, the V6-powered B4000 pickup truck has the highest towing capability of all the B-Series trucks, but its rear flip-down seats "are not really viable adult seating positions", reports contributor Bob McHugh.

 More:
Read the article | View the photos | All The Test Drives
Logged
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14901



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2008, 05:58:13 am »

a 5.3l 4x4 GMC gets better mileage
the B4000 4X4 offers 15.4 L/100 km (18 m.p.g.) city and 11.6 L/100 km (24 m.p.g.) (highway)
5.3l 4WD:                 15.1                                              10.6

So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Logged
Cord
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2008, 01:13:13 pm »

Quote
So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Purchase price?
Logged
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6679


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2008, 01:21:06 pm »

Quote
So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Purchase price?

Not everybody wants a full size truck?
Logged

How is it possible that after electricity has traveled through hundreds of miles of power line then hundreds of feet (or yards) of romex in our home, that changing the last three feet of wire with something exotic, expensive (cool looking, and packaged in a pricey box) is going to make a difference?
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 7090


Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2008, 01:40:30 pm »

Why hasn't FoMoCo updated this beast?  10 years without a significant update.  And no 4 door model available.  My BIL recently purchased his 3rd Ranger in a row.  I question why he would buy another one when there are better/improved competitors?  Oh well...it's not my money.
Logged
Cord
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2008, 02:56:38 pm »

The last few months have produced the largest monthly sales on record for the Ranger in Canada. It's probably a little difficult for Ford of Canada to claim they need a new model to be competitive. Hopefully though we will see an update sooner than later. Those so-called rear seats just get in the way of storage space.
Logged
PJungnitsch
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2004 Pontiac Vibe, 1987 Mazda B2000, 1996 Yamaha TW200
Gender: Male
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 2985



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2008, 03:17:40 pm »

Why hasn't FoMoCo updated this beast?  10 years without a significant update.  And no 4 door model available.  My BIL recently purchased his 3rd Ranger in a row.  I question why he would buy another one when there are better/improved competitors?  Oh well...it's not my money.

Same reason my Dad bought one I imagine, they are half price, and still get the job done:

Base Ranger 4X4 extended cab auto: $23,120 @ 0% for 60 is $385/month.

Base Tacoma 4X4 extended cab auto: $32,975 @ 4.9% for 60 is $621/month.

And that's without any dickering, which the Ford or Mazda dealer is much more likely to do.

It's a shame Ford doesn't put in that new 4 cyl/6 speed auto in all models, they do go for a mileage special but only with the older 4cyl and only in the regular cab.

Adding contemporary safety features like SAB and ESP would be good as well as some modern optimizations for better mileage. That 'you get almost the same mileage in a full size truck' issue always comes up.

If they could do those improvements while keeping the cost the same (and they should, small cars have been upping safety and mileage while holding price) they could do well IMO.

I'd love to replace my B2000 with a similar but modern small and efficient truck, but one doesn't exist.
Logged
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 7090


Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2008, 03:39:30 pm »

The BIL bought an FX4 model.  He previously owned a '90 reg. cab short box 4x4 that he beat the living pi$$ out of (farmer/hunter/angler).  It caught fire about 4 years ago.  It was replaced by a leased 2WD ext. cab.  When the lease expired, he purchased the new FX4.

I will agree that the current Ranger/B series is a 'right size' truck for many people.  The competition has grown noticibly, and some people don't want a mid-size truck.
Logged
jcon
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Something New, 2006 Honda Accord EX-L
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1552



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2008, 04:14:04 pm »

My buddy has '96 Ranger and loves it. He plans to replace it soon with another. Of course he's convinced that they've completely redesigned the model since he purchased his because, and I quote, "They look taller now." Tongue

It's a great little truck. I considered it and would still consider it, if I wasn't planing on having children in the near future.  Cheesy

I think I would get the Ranger over the B4000, but the best deal would win.

These vehicles sell quite well, and Ford/Mazda are not taking any chances with a complete redesign.
Logged
PJungnitsch
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2004 Pontiac Vibe, 1987 Mazda B2000, 1996 Yamaha TW200
Gender: Male
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 2985



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2008, 04:34:01 pm »

These vehicles sell quite well, and Ford/Mazda are not taking any chances with a complete redesign.

That's because they are closing the factory in Minnesota. Shutdown been postponed a little because of the very strong Canadian sales mentioned, but American sales are awful. AFAIK there still is no certain word on what happens next, but it may be dropped altogether.

The future of the Ford Ranger pickup is uncertain. What is certain is that the only plant assembling the Ranger, in St. Paul, Minn., is scheduled to be closed in 2008.

Options include dropping the compact pickup line, moving Ranger production to another plant or redesigning the pickup using portions of the Explorer architecture. If Ford executives endorse the last choice, the redesigned pickup could be on the market at the end of this decade or the beginning of the next. If redesigned, "F-100" has been considered as the new name.

Ford also has studied a global compact pickup design that could be built overseas and exported to several markets, including the United States.

Plans to redesign the Ranger have been delayed several times. The current pickup dates back to the 1993 model year.
Logged
Greg B.
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 567


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2008, 05:44:01 pm »

Last year both my brother and a good friend leased new Ranger V-6 Sport extended cabs at ridiculously low prices -- something on the order of $340/month. They both love them. This is my brother's second Ranger. I have to admit, they have a unique market niche -- there aren't a whole lot of pickups out there this size any more; most are far too big. And with the tooling costs long having since been amortized, Ford can afford to sell these competitively, though maybe not this competitively. I read recently that when Alan Mulally took over at Ford he was told that Ford loses thousands on each Ranger they sell. So its future is dark.
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40331



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2008, 05:58:49 pm »

OK i Owe each of U Guys a cheap Tequilla Or a 1,000 Pak of LAKEPORT ya can call me Ranger Bill ya can calls me Mazda 3000 but ya doesn't have ta CALL ME JOHNSTON....... Wink Grin


* Safs PeeCup.JPG (80.33 KB, 800x533 - viewed 221 times.)

* organ.gif (28.96 KB, 231x200 - viewed 1559 times.)
« Last Edit: January 28, 2008, 12:37:07 pm by safristi » Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
kurtdaniel
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: New York, NY
Posts: 5


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2010, 05:19:46 am »

this is one of the best full size truck i had,, aside from dodge parts, mazda pickup has the est truck parts ever made in auto history..
« Last Edit: January 11, 2010, 09:25:46 pm by kurtdaniel » Logged
Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2010, 08:10:48 am »

Quote
So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Purchase price?

Not everybody wants a full size truck?

Being able to drive and park it in crowded spaces?
Logged

Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2010, 08:14:42 am »

I would definitely be interested in an updated crew-cab B/Ranger with a proper 4-cylinder. I've always loved 'compact' trucks, and the Mazda/Ford offerings are the only ones left. But I need it to have 4 proper doors.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 37 queries.