Author Topic: The real reason for traffic jams: us!  (Read 1418 times)

Offline UmroAyyar

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Canuckistan
  • Posts: 7168
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« on: December 22, 2007, 10:27:17 pm »
No, this is not a rant, its a scientific study. :P
-----------------------------------------

Finally, there's an explanation for those wasted hours we spent on the MassPike today asking no one in particular "what the (dirty word) is this (dirty word)?" A team of mathemeticians from the Universities of Exeter, Bristol and Budapest developed a mathematical model revealing that traffic jams are caused by idiots. Okay, not exactly. The real explanation is that unexpected events, such as being cut off, require slowing below a threshold speed for smooth traffic flow. As we've all observed, when the car in front of you brakes suddenly, you need to brake even harder to compensate for your reaction time; this creates a wave that radiates back through traffic. That "backward-traveling-wave" means that because of one driver's inattention, we all pay for it miles behind.

The results of the study really point up the need to drive smoothly. Roads with heavy traffic volume seem to be more prone to traffic jams, too, but that's not necessarily the case. Heavy volume can proceed smoothly if drivers anticipate and avoid sudden actions. In the end, it appears that the main way to fix traffic jams is driver diligence. The low-tech solution is to pay attention when you're behind the wheel, but we've also now got radar-based cruise control that does this for you, so you can continue blithely on your way. It boils down to common sense; be a smooth driver, expect that everyone around you is a moron, and hopefully you won't be slamming on your brakes, causing a domino reaction.


http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/the-real-reason-for-traffic-jams-us/
(Corolla Upgraded --> (Camry Sold | (Intrepid Taken Out))) --> 1999 Mazda 626 LX 2.5V6

"since the masses are always eager to believe something, for their benefit nothing is so easy to arrange as facts."

¡ʇnɥs ɥʇnoɯ ɹnoʎ dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝɔuɐɥɔ ɐ ssıɯ ɹǝʌǝu

Offline dr_spock

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Canada
  • Posts: 10568
  • Carma: +10/-4
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2007, 10:28:53 pm »
Did you find that on Slashdot.org?   I recall something like that the other day.  :)


Offline random006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Montreal, QC.
  • Posts: 4966
  • Carma: +5/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2007, 10:33:30 pm »
I, or someone else, posted this here quite a while ago.  Here is the full article, explaining the "travelling wave" theory of traffic jams:

http://amasci.com/amateur/traffic/traffic1.html

It's a 3 page article with a FAQ on the 4th page.  Enjoy. :D

Offline UmroAyyar

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Canuckistan
  • Posts: 7168
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2007, 10:35:56 pm »
Here's the link to the original linked article. random006, I recall something on the topic, couldn't remember exactly, could have searched.  :P
----------------------------------------

Traffic jam mystery solved by mathematicians

Mathematicians from the University of Exeter have solved the mystery of traffic jams by developing a model to show how major delays occur on our roads, with no apparent cause. Many traffic jams leave drivers baffled as they finally reach the end of a tail-back to find no visible cause for their delay.
Now, a team of mathematicians from the Universities of Exeter, Bristol and Budapest, have found the answer and published their findings in leading academic journal Proceedings of the Royal Society.

The team developed a mathematical model to show the impact of unexpected events such as a lorry pulling out of its lane on a dual carriageway. Their model revealed that slowing down below a critical speed when reacting to such an event, a driver would force the car behind to slow down further and the next car back to reduce its speed further still.

The result of this is that several miles back, cars would finally grind to a halt, with drivers oblivious to the reason for their delay. The model predicts that this is a very typical scenario on a busy highway (above 15 vehicles per km). The jam moves backwards through the traffic creating a so-called ‘backward travelling wave’, which drivers may encounter many miles upstream, several minutes after it was triggered.

Dr Gábor Orosz of the University of Exeter said: “As many of us prepare to travel long distances to see family and friends over Christmas, we’re likely to experience the frustration of getting stuck in a traffic jam that seems to have no cause. Our model shows that overreaction of a single driver can have enormous impact on the rest of the traffic, leading to massive delays.”

Drivers and policy-makers have not previously known why jams like this occur, though many have put it down to the sheer volume of traffic. While this clearly plays a part in this new theory, the main issue is around the smoothness of traffic flow. According to the model, heavy traffic will not automatically lead to congestion but can be smooth-flowing. This model takes into account the time-delay in drivers’ reactions, which lead to drivers braking more heavily than would have been necessary had they identified and reacted to a problem ahead a second earlier.

Dr Orosz continued: “When you tap your brake, the traffic may come to a full stand-still several miles behind you. It really matters how hard you brake - a slight braking from a driver who has identified a problem early will allow the traffic flow to remain smooth. Heavier braking, usually caused by a driver reacting late to a problem, can affect traffic flow for many miles.”

The research team now plans to develop a model for cars equipped with new electronic devices, which could cut down on over-braking as a result of slow reactions.

Source: University of Exeter

http://www.physorg.com/news117283969.html

Offline random006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Montreal, QC.
  • Posts: 4966
  • Carma: +5/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2007, 10:48:42 pm »
Here's the link to the original linked article. random006, I recall something on the topic, couldn't remember exactly, could have searched.  :P
----------------------------------------


Yes, I followed that link.  The link I gave is a much more detailed study of the phenomenon.  Truly fascinating subject and it should be required reading for all would be drivers taking driver's ed.

NOTE:  I was sorely tempted to say "required reading at the Academy" but refrained.  ;)

Offline Iso Octane

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Toronto
  • Posts: 676
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • to the beat of the different drum
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2007, 11:06:42 pm »
Ah, it's nice to see my anger is justified.

I have this "flow like the water" theory of driving in traffic.  It's really quite zen.  his article justifies my 'theory' as well.  Basically it goes like: pick a maximum speed (say, 10kph over the limit) and as long as conditions allow, try to maintain that speed.  Flow like the water, and traffic shall achieve the same tranquility.  Ahhhh.

Offline UmroAyyar

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Canuckistan
  • Posts: 7168
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2007, 11:11:06 pm »
Well, on the highway your commuting pleasure (safety/well being) is somewhat dependent on the group you are following. I find driving behind a vehicle which accelerates fast and then brakes hard quite annoying 'causes disturbance in the force'.

I change lanes, slow down or speed up to adjust and fall behind a driver that goes with the flow.

Offline PJungnitsch

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Edmonton, AB
  • Posts: 3042
  • Carma: +8/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Travel in Africa
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2007, 11:11:29 pm »
Interesting.

Always wondered why the Deerfoot, wide and straight with absolutely no traffic lights, still turns into a rolling parking lot.

Offline initial_D

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Deer Red Green Lodge, Ab
  • Posts: 12378
  • Carma: +14/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2007, 01:26:49 am »
Interesting.

Always wondered why the Deerfoot, wide and straight with absolutely no traffic lights, still turns into a rolling parking lot.

People stop for random deer crossing.  :)

Online tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14420
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2007, 06:39:41 am »
I, or someone else, posted this here quite a while ago.  Here is the full article, explaining the "travelling wave" theory of traffic jams:

http://amasci.com/amateur/traffic/traffic1.html

It's a 3 page article with a FAQ on the 4th page.  Enjoy. :D

I have had that one bookmarked for years.  It is dated 1998.   I try to drive that way in expressways  Just like:

I have this "flow like the water" theory of driving in traffic.  It's really quite zen.  his article justifies my 'theory' as well.  Basically it goes like: pick a maximum speed (say, 10kph over the limit) and as long as conditions allow, try to maintain that speed.  Flow like the water, and traffic shall achieve the same tranquility.  Ahhhh.

which I take to also mean... try never to use the brakes ;cos if you do then the person behind will have to do so as well... just as the article states.

IMHO one of the problems is these damn automatic transmissions, not the automaticness of them for gear changes but the lack of engine braking.  If an automatic could perform like a manual on the overrun, that is, more or less deceleration depending on gear and engine speed, sooner or later people would stop using the brakes so much and the problem would be somewhat alleviated.    It might be easier to make brake lights work on deceleration rather than just a dumb switch... that would work as well.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Offline Wolfe

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Tronno
  • Posts: 2806
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • BOO!
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2007, 08:24:48 am »
Quote
A team of mathemeticians from the Universities of Exeter, Bristol and Budapest developed a mathematical model revealing that traffic jams are caused by idiots. Okay, not exactly. The real explanation is that unexpected events, such as being cut off, require slowing below a threshold speed for smooth traffic flow. As we've all observed, when the car in front of you brakes suddenly, you need to brake even harder to compensate for your reaction time; this creates a wave that radiates back through traffic. That "backward-traveling-wave" means that because of one driver's inattention, we all pay for it miles behind.



It seems as if the engineers who designed the roads and highways in and around the GTA (I won't speak about other areas but I'm sure some are similar) actually set out to maximize the number of these types of "unexpected events" with all sorts of lanes which appear out of nowhere and then disappear for no apparent reason a little ways down the road.

These now-you-see-them-now-you-don't lanes mean lots more lane changing than would otherwise be necessary which creates many more instances of these cascading brakelights.

To err is human, to blame it on someone else is even more human.

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2007, 08:25:49 am »
Real reason for TRAFFIC JAMS...........TRAFFIC our roads are OVER POPULATED.......dreaming for perfection is just that a NIGHTMARE...remember those POP Mechanics ideas cars funneled onto Hiway "cog Railway" or light beam systems that allowed U hands off driving while towing everyone along safely and swiftly and U programming your EXIT..................maybe someday..if we still have KARS as we know them....
« Last Edit: December 23, 2007, 08:28:20 am by safristi »
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....

Offline Greg B.

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Dartmouth, NS
  • Posts: 567
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2007, 03:57:31 pm »
I'm not sure anyone knows how to design a road for optimal traffic flow. One of the things that I've noticed on my morning comute is how certain design features actually impede traffic flow. We have the MacKay bridge here which has two lanes approaching its toll gates. In the mornings those two lanes are busy but usually flow at a reasonable speed. Then they queue up at 6 toll booths, 3 of which are automated transponder only (ironically, these are usually the slowest of all, but that's not the point of this post). After the tolls the traffic funnels back to 2 lanes, and is stop-and-crawl, bumper to bumper, until you get onto the bridge, where it flows well again.

Now I'm sure the designer thought that 6 toll booths would help traffic flow better, but in practice it seems to be just the opposite. The funnel behavior it creates really slows things down. It occurs to me that with some reconfig, the two transponder lanes could be made straight through, while the other cash/assisted toll lanes could be physically separated from the rest, maintain their existing funnel, but require a stop or yield to enter the traffic. This would motivate more folks to get a transponder and penalize the change-tossing types who impede traffic currently.

Sadly, it's highly doubtful this will ever occur. 

Offline marineboy

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Edmonton
  • Posts: 595
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2007, 04:43:46 pm »
So now we've quantified that a car can act both as a wave and a particle is it also true that time slows down as we approach the speed of traffic??? :rofl:

Offline airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Cobourg Ontario
  • Posts: 15974
  • Carma: +92/-89
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2000 BMW 323, 2010 Toyota Prius, 2011Chevy Silverado LTZ
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #14 on: December 23, 2007, 05:08:33 pm »
I'm not sure anyone knows how to design a road for optimal traffic flow. One of the things that I've noticed on my morning comute is how certain design features actually impede traffic flow. We have the MacKay bridge here which has two lanes approaching its toll gates. In the mornings those two lanes are busy but usually flow at a reasonable speed. Then they queue up at 6 toll booths, 3 of which are automated transponder only (ironically, these are usually the slowest of all, but that's not the point of this post). After the tolls the traffic funnels back to 2 lanes, and is stop-and-crawl, bumper to bumper, until you get onto the bridge, where it flows well again.

Now I'm sure the designer thought that 6 toll booths would help traffic flow better, but in practice it seems to be just the opposite. The funnel behavior it creates really slows things down. It occurs to me that with some reconfig, the two transponder lanes could be made straight through, while the other cash/assisted toll lanes could be physically separated from the rest, maintain their existing funnel, but require a stop or yield to enter the traffic. This would motivate more folks to get a transponder and penalize the change-tossing types who impede traffic currently.

Sadly, it's highly doubtful this will ever occur. 


That not problem, design is fine , it is just no one knows how to drive there :rofl:

Online tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14420
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #15 on: December 23, 2007, 07:26:57 pm »
So now we've quantified that a car can act both as a wave and a particle is it also true that time slows down as we approach the speed of traffic??? :rofl:
no but haven't you noticed that the other driver form interference patterns in front of you when you have to pass through a single lane.

Online tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Guelph On.
  • Posts: 14420
  • Carma: +32/-31
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: The real reason for traffic jams: us!
« Reply #16 on: December 23, 2007, 07:31:21 pm »
I'm not sure anyone knows how to design a road for optimal traffic flow. One of the things that I've noticed on my morning comute is how certain design features actually impede traffic flow. We have the MacKay bridge here which has two lanes approaching its toll gates. In the mornings those two lanes are busy but usually flow at a reasonable speed. Then they queue up at 6 toll booths, 3 of which are automated transponder only (ironically, these are usually the slowest of all, but that's not the point of this post). After the tolls the traffic funnels back to 2 lanes, and is stop-and-crawl, bumper to bumper, until you get onto the bridge, where it flows well again.

Now I'm sure the designer thought that 6 toll booths would help traffic flow better, but in practice it seems to be just the opposite. The funnel behavior it creates really slows things down. It occurs to me that with some reconfig, the two transponder lanes could be made straight through, while the other cash/assisted toll lanes could be physically separated from the rest, maintain their existing funnel, but require a stop or yield to enter the traffic. This would motivate more folks to get a transponder and penalize the change-tossing types who impede traffic currently.

Sadly, it's highly doubtful this will ever occur. 

The toll booths on French and Spanish autoroutes are like this. 3 lanes spreads to 6 or 8 booths some of which are transponer only and some are truck only.   They don't clog up on the output side because they have about a quarter mile or so with no lane markings before they get back to 3 lanes.  Effect: Leave the booth and accelerate flat out towards your chosen lane and everyone has space to adjust behind or in front of you to funnel smoothly into position.

I do realize that not everywhere has the space to do that  ;)