Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8  (Read 4577 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Mighty Duck
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 7036


the mighty duck


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2007, 08:37:07 am »

Really?? Lessee, the SRT8's as-tested price was (gasp) $62,695. For that you can buy an '08 Subaru Impreza Sport ($23,195), an '08 Nissan Versa SL hatchback ($18,573) and still have almost 21 grand left over for a nice used SUV. (hopefully a small one)  There's your 3 cars. Grin

Oh My God!  Really???  Because I'm sure there's absolutely no other costs to owning a vehicle.  Like, say...  insurance.  Finding somewhere to park it.  Equipping them all with winter tires.   Roll Eyes  Not to mention the SRT8 starts closer to $50k.  And neither the WRX or the Versa offer the same combination of size, practicality, and safety that the Jeep does.
Logged

Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2007, 09:15:25 am »

..HOW MANY GOTTLES OF GEER ONNA WALL..............$50K?Huh?? Drool Drool Drool Fall Beer Beer Beer
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2007, 10:27:10 am »

Yes it is. Unlike the Mustang or Challenger, the SRT8 pretends to be useful because of it's huge size. It's back seat is almost useless by regular people, so the SRT8 sounds stupid to me.

Actually, unlike the Mustang or Challenger, the Jeep is useful because it has decent-sized rear seats, a big cargo area, and AWD.  Not to mention available DVD entertainment and navigation.  Sounds perfect for the family with two kids in little league who can't afford three vehicles!

Unless you're going to try and argue that rear seats, cargo space, and AWD are all completely useless, I don't see where you're coming from.  But please, do try and convince me just how stupid we all are for wanting cars that can seat five, carry luggage, and drive confidently in the winter!   Popcorn

 I Agree
Logged

Mark D
Guest

« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2007, 01:17:16 pm »

One thing about the interior space, I don't think its fair to say the SRT8's drawback is space - because its a drawback on all Grand Cherokee's.

I find the fuel figures a little hard to swallow.  How hard was this car pushed?  I think the people that buy it are gonna have fun for the first week or so, but then they'll start driving normal - which would lower the consumption.
Logged
2hondas1BMW
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '04 Acura TSX
Gender: Male
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3016


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2007, 04:40:04 pm »

One thing about the interior space, I don't think its fair to say the SRT8's drawback is space - because its a drawback on all Grand Cherokee's.

I find the fuel figures a little hard to swallow.  How hard was this car pushed?  I think the people that buy it are gonna have fun for the first week or so, but then they'll start driving normal - which would lower the consumption.

Then whats the point?  Huh
Logged

Mine: 2004 Acura TSX
Family: 2005 Honda Odyssey EX, 2006 BMW 330i
chrischasescars
WingMan
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Whatever they're paying me to drive this week
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 929


Automotive journalism ninja


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2007, 04:52:17 pm »

I find the fuel figures a little hard to swallow.  How hard was this car pushed?  I think the people that buy it are gonna have fun for the first week or so, but then they'll start driving normal - which would lower the consumption.

Not very hard. I don't drive hard as a rule, and am especially easy on the gas in vehicles like this, just so I don't destroy my monthly gas budget (I have a cool job, but I don't get to pick what I drive). That said, we have to hammer the gas a few times, at least, to get a feel for how the vehicle performs. It's probably important to point out that my usual driving routine is mostly city driving, so the fact that I only went over the NRCan city rating by a couple litres/100 km is almost respectable considering how powerful this truck is.
Logged

Buy this car to drive to work; Drive to work to pay for this car.
I write stuff here: ThisIsWhatIThinkOfYourCar.com
I sing stuff here: ChrisChasesCars.bandcamp.com/
si
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: si
Gender: Male
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3907



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: November 28, 2007, 05:22:52 pm »

But please, do try and convince me just how stupid we all are for wanting cars that can seat five, carry luggage, and drive confidently in the winter!   Popcorn

Not sure how well you're going to get all that 420hp to the road in winter with a layer of ice between you and the road.  Wink


Though more expensive, the G Cherokee CDI is much more attractive to me than the SRT-8.  Fack I'm getting old.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2007, 05:24:50 pm by SIVIC » Logged

The Mighty Duck
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 7036


the mighty duck


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: November 28, 2007, 06:15:04 pm »

Not sure how well you're going to get all that 420hp to the road in winter with a layer of ice between you and the road.  Wink

A lot better than the RWD Charger or 300C.

Quote
Though more expensive, the G Cherokee CDI is much more attractive to me than the SRT-8. 

Totally different vehicles, though.  I love the theory of the SRT8.  Fuel bill and ludicrous emissions, on the other hand...

Quote
Fack I'm getting old.

Time to trade in the Civic for a Buick, eh?
Logged

Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
si
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: si
Gender: Male
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3907



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: November 28, 2007, 06:33:35 pm »

Not sure how well you're going to get all that 420hp to the road in winter with a layer of ice between you and the road.  Wink

A lot better than the RWD Charger or 300C.

Quote
Though more expensive, the G Cherokee CDI is much more attractive to me than the SRT-8. 

Totally different vehicles, though.  I love the theory of the SRT8.  Fuel bill and ludicrous emissions, on the other hand...

Quote
Fack I'm getting old.

Time to trade in the Civic for a Buick, eh?

You're the second person to say exactly that.   

Off the record, I have been looking into the CX-7, a used Range Rover, FX35, and even that CDI GCherokee (but that model is getting old for my tastes).  Undecided
Logged

safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40332



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: November 28, 2007, 06:34:48 pm »

Sivic yer lookin' OLDE...time fer a HEMI_SEMI_DEMI QUAVER LIFT..... Cool Cool
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
sirAQUAMAN64
Board Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagen TDI Comfortline 6MT. 2009 Dodge Ram 1500 Crew Cab Sport 4X4
Gender: Male
Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
Posts: 13358



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: November 29, 2007, 11:47:20 am »

As a whole I feel the Grand Cherokees are space ineffecient and somewhat uncompetitive. The HEMI and CDI are redeeming qualities.

Have to say I LOVE the SRT8 sound and central exhaust. Can only imagine the fun I'd have piloting that beast. Would be a ball to drive, but not my thing to own.
Logged

AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!
Mark D
Guest

« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2007, 12:49:45 pm »

I find the fuel figures a little hard to swallow.  How hard was this car pushed?  I think the people that buy it are gonna have fun for the first week or so, but then they'll start driving normal - which would lower the consumption.

Not very hard. I don't drive hard as a rule, and am especially easy on the gas in vehicles like this, just so I don't destroy my monthly gas budget (I have a cool job, but I don't get to pick what I drive). That said, we have to hammer the gas a few times, at least, to get a feel for how the vehicle performs. It's probably important to point out that my usual driving routine is mostly city driving, so the fact that I only went over the NRCan city rating by a couple litres/100 km is almost respectable considering how powerful this truck is.

Thankyou for clarifying.

Also, the point of a vehicle like this?  Fun!  A coworker of mine bought his when they first came out, he still owns it, and drives it even in the sick Alberta weather.  He loves it.  He can hang with a Corvette during the summer, he still has 4x4 stick with good rubber in the winter, and the space, although crappy for an SUV, is still far from cramped.
Logged
CarGuy123
Guest

« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2007, 12:02:44 am »

GREAT TECHNOLOGY!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 31 queries.