Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: I want a minivan.  (Read 9663 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Stuff
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1256


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #40 on: May 30, 2007, 11:43:26 am »

I think the Toyota and Honda van's are somewhat cool looking. The others, you will just look like a loser.



  Coming from a guy who drives a G5

Nothing wrong with any of the coupes under 20k.
Logged
dorin
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3 GS
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4873


light makes right


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #41 on: May 30, 2007, 12:30:24 pm »

The sedans and wagons of yore were as long and wide as minivans are today.  They were probably as heavy, if not heavier.  There was lotsa steel in the ol' County Squire.  The wagons, IIRC, sometimes had a rear facing seat for extra passengers.

You're wrong there.
- 1958 Ford Country Squire:  3508 lbs. (seating for Cool
- 1968 Ford Country Squire:  4167 lbs.

- 2007 Chrysler Town & Country:  4442 lbs.
- 2007 Chevrolet Uplander:  4233 lbs.
- 2007 Honda Odyssey:  4678 lbs.
- 2007 Kia Sedona:  4387 lbs.
- 2007 Toyota Sienna:  4266 lbs.
Logged

My favourite MTB site in Ottawa: http://www.mtbkanata.com
dorin
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3 GS
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4873


light makes right


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #42 on: May 30, 2007, 12:32:14 pm »

I'd find your openmindedness for minivans more praiseworthy (i.e., "I do think that people should realize that things like hipness and sex appeal are both relative and subjective") if you weren't so snotty about "piece of station wagons."  As things stand, I think you're a bit of a hypocrite.

I Agree
Logged

My favourite MTB site in Ottawa: http://www.mtbkanata.com
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 7090


Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #43 on: May 30, 2007, 01:28:03 pm »

Links, please.  Tongue
Logged
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #44 on: May 30, 2007, 01:38:22 pm »

I want a minivan.

Although it sounds like an innocuous desire, I am often met with a barrage of disparaging groans and snickers when I admit this in mixed company. “Don’t do it!,” the crowd will yell as they look at me with mix of horror and pity on their faces. Apparently, minivans symbolize something undesirable to many people. From what I can gather, many believe that purchasing a minivan is tantamount to surrendering any chance of being hip, spontaneous, and most importantly, sexy. I think this population of knee-jerk minivan-phobes is sorely misinformed.

I will concede that my desire for a minivan is pragmatic, even banal. Basically, I want the ability to transport more than just my family of four in a safe and comfortable fashion. Right now, I can offer an extra passenger in our car about eight inches of butt space (complete with lap belt) between two booster seats in the backseat. I know that in the good old days, we piled ourselves two deep into the front seat and such, but there are laws against that now. Besides, I want a vehicle with some room to stretch out during long road trips.

So, the only vehicles still currently being manufactured that offer the kind of space I want are oversized SUVs and minivans. While an oversized SUV might render me cool in some circles, my personal belief is that if you own that type of vehicle, you better damn well be using it to pull a large boat or horse trailer - not to take your kids and their friends to the movies. This belief makes the minivan the obvious choice for me.

When I explain my logic to the anti-minivan camp, they inevitably conclude that I can circumvent this dilemma by purchasing the apparently now hip and ironic full-size station wagon. Strangely enough, nobody ever suggests the full-size conversion van - complete with swivel seats and card table -which, if you’re into being ironic, has far more bang for the buck. But that’s beside the point. My point is that I’m not going to choose some piece of station wagon over a minivan. It may be hip in some circles, it is certainly has an air of spontaneity, but in my world view there ain’t a damn thing sexy about a station wagon.

So lately, I’ve taken a different tack. It is this. I am claiming, with a straight face, that minivan is really the sexiest ride around. First of all, if you need a minivan, you’ve been getting busy on a regular basis in the past few years and you have the goods to prove it. Secondly, anybody who has taken a ride in the recent crop of minivans cannot tell me these vehicles don’t offer a smooth ride. If a smooth ride brought Prince to a falsetto in Little Red Corvette, the minivan can do the same for fathers in their 30s and 40s. Finally, all that space I’ve been talking about? I have a friend, a mother of three, (I am not making this up) who insists that the biggest advantage of her minivan is the ample space it has for her and her husband to get down to business while the kids are at piano lessons. If a vehicle in which you can have sex is not sexy, then I guess just don’t get it.

While I don’t really expect people to believe that the minivan is the sexiest vehicle out there, I do think that people should realize that things like hipness and sex appeal are both relative and subjective. I’m going to buy the car that suits my needs regardless of what other people say, but I’m going to have some fun doing it, and part of that is changing the image of the minivan, one group of nay-sayers at a time.

So all you folks with your Subarus, your mini-SUV’s, and your cramped sedans, listen up. The question is no longer “is the minivan cool?”, but rather, “are you cool enough for the minivan?”

“but in my world view there ain’t a damn thing sexy about a station wagon”  Huh 
Your world must be hell.
Logged

DockMan
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru WRX
Gender: Male
Location: SW (Lonely Road) Ontario
Posts: 1799



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #45 on: May 30, 2007, 01:44:29 pm »

amen, Snowman, amen.
Logged

Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all. - John W. Gardner
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14916



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #46 on: May 30, 2007, 01:44:42 pm »

Black or Blue is probably better to for sexy, grey / silver does not cut it for sexy
Logged
Titanium48
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Saturn SL2
Gender: Male
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 288

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #47 on: May 30, 2007, 01:47:51 pm »


I'd like to see a minivan that is actually mini and not a 2000 kg hulking monster.  Start with a 5-door subcompact hatchback, make it 10 cm wider, stretch the wheelbase by 30 cm and add 20 cm of rear overhang.  There is now room for a third seat between the rear wheels while the middle seat has become wide enough to accomodate 3 people with a modicum of comfort, giving a total seating capacity of 7.  Add a set of rear hinged doors (like you find on extended cab pickups or saturn "quad coupes") to access the rearmost seats.  The whole 7-door, 7 seat package should come in under 1500 kg and be adequately powered by a 2.2L 4 cylinder engine, giving decent fuel economy.

You've almost described a Mazda5.....

I guess I did.  I still think the "quad coupe" style rear doors would be an improvement - they'd give a wider opening and be easier to use than a slider.  I also wonder why Mazda doesn't offer a 3-person bench middle seat as an option.  8.0L/100km on the highway is dissapointing, but that might be due in part to a 2.3L engine spinning at 2750 RPM at 100 km/h in 5th gear - it could probably use a wider ratio transmission.  My Saturn has the same power to weight ratio and 5th gear has the engine doing 2200 RPM at 100 km/h.
Logged
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #48 on: May 30, 2007, 03:59:50 pm »


I see many couples panic when they have one or two children and run off to buy a vehicle because they think they need a bus all of a sudden.


I Agree

Exactly!!

I'm gonna get a two seater for me and the baby, and a two seater for the wife, with room for another baby! HOWZAT!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbGEOob5x4g

 Tongue Tongue Tongue
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

mdxtasy
Guest

« Reply #49 on: May 30, 2007, 04:05:05 pm »

A minivan isn't a need, but it sure is handy.  Having a vehicle that can be the versatile jack of all trades vehicle is a very nice and convenient.  Haul stuff?  No problem.  Seat 7?  Of course.  Family vacation with room to spare and room for luggage?  Easy peasy.  Efficient?  Yes.  Comfortable?  Of course.  Nobody NEEDS the room....as most times you will be carrying excess cargo capacity that won't be utilized.  But for what a minivan can do, it's a good all rounder.

"When growing up we were a family of 5 and the minivan was not available yet and we traveled well on vacations in sedans and wagons with enough luggage for holidays."

You probably didn't have flushing toilets and electricity when you were a kid, doesn't mean it's not nice to have now.   Kiss   Grin
Logged
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #50 on: May 30, 2007, 04:13:35 pm »

Prior to the Highlander purchase my wife was pressuring me to buy a minivan. I presented her an excel spreadsheet populated with utilization factors which indicated we could rent a van for 3 weeks a year and be ahead. If you analyze how many time you utilize the vehicle to its full capacity it will be clear.  Smiley
« Last Edit: May 30, 2007, 04:15:29 pm by Snowman » Logged

mdxtasy
Guest

« Reply #51 on: May 30, 2007, 04:15:44 pm »

Prior to the Highlander purchase my wife was pressuring me to buy a minivan. I presented he an excel spreadsheet populated with utilization factors which indicated we could rent a van for 3 weeks a year and be ahead. If you analyze how many time you utilize the vehicle to its full capacity the answerer will be clear.  Smiley

I agree.....I'm more of a wagon man myself.
Logged
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #52 on: May 30, 2007, 04:19:22 pm »

Prior to the Highlander purchase my wife was pressuring me to buy a minivan. I presented her an excel spreadsheet populated with utilization factors which indicated we could rent a van for 3 weeks a year and be ahead. If you analyze how many time you utilize the vehicle to its full capacity it will be clear.  Smiley

You consultants, I bet you do a cost/benefit for everything!
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

G0dspd
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 2539


Vroum Vroum


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #53 on: May 30, 2007, 05:35:51 pm »

Changing the plugs on a V6 or V8 Mini Van ....
Pray tell, what is this beast? 
Mercedes R Class?

I'm sure Dodge will introduce the Dodge Caravan SRT-8 with the new generation.  Roll Eyes
Logged

"If you go through the pearly gates backwards in a fireball, that's a cool way to die!"
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #54 on: May 30, 2007, 05:37:21 pm »

Changing the plugs on a V6 or V8 Mini Van ....
Pray tell, what is this beast? 
Mercedes R Class?

I'm sure Dodge will introduce the Dodge Caravan SRT-8 with the new generation.  Roll Eyes

Yes, and I like it.
Logged

Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #55 on: May 30, 2007, 06:09:53 pm »

Dad had one of these. Considered intermediate at the time. Not too far off the porkiness of the current "mini" vans, but could tow a hell of a lot more. Dad had the 400. Best mileage he ever got was 18mpg IIRC. He traded it in on an '82 Escort, which got double the mileage. A bit tight with three kids in the back though!

Available with wood-grained side trim and Rally II wheelswas the stylish Grand LeMans Safari. It was a plush station Wagon with features, on the standard equipment list,like cut-pile carpeting and extra acoustical insulation.Designated by Style Number G35, this 4,505 pound haulercould be bought for as little as $5,479. That included the400 cubic inch V-8; Turbo-Hydra-Matic transmission;power steering, and power front disc brakes. Interestinglyenough, PMD records do not give a production total forthis car. However, Crestline Publishing has discoveredthat 6,094 examples were built.

http://www.abodysite.com/76hisbook.html


« Last Edit: May 30, 2007, 06:13:03 pm by Big_Thumb » Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
Turbo Bob
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Gender: Male
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 9172


Profesional Dash Stroker


View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #56 on: May 30, 2007, 06:19:44 pm »


“but in my world view there ain’t a damn thing sexy about a station wagon”  Huh 
Your world must be hell.


Snowy, it might upset the ride quality a tad but that wagon needs bigger rims!



 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Logged

Power is how fast you hit the wall... Torque is how far you take the wall with you!

Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #57 on: May 30, 2007, 07:02:27 pm »


“but in my world view there ain’t a damn thing sexy about a station wagon”  Huh 
Your world must be hell.


Snowy, it might upset the ride quality a tad but that wagon needs bigger rims!



 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



  Shocked 
Logged

Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2011 Subaru Outback 3.6R Limited, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 6800


You call this an angry mob?


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #58 on: May 30, 2007, 07:16:09 pm »

Oh god, are there a lot of cars like that down here. There's a mint green late 80s Buick with 24s on it. I've seen a Corolla with ~22s on it. Horrible.....

(not my picture)


* 24inbitch.jpg (22.39 KB, 400x205 - viewed 57 times.)
Logged

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. –
Carl Sagan
dorin
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3 GS
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4873


light makes right


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #59 on: May 30, 2007, 07:21:28 pm »

Links, please.  Tongue

Google is your friend Mr.T.  Wink

I got the minivan weights from Edmunds.com and I just googled "country squire".
Logged

My favourite MTB site in Ottawa: http://www.mtbkanata.com
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 39 queries.