Author Topic: CTC Review: 2007 Ford Edge (Read 10478 times)

wing · « **Reply #40 on:** March 09, 2007, 01:58:05 pm »

Whoops route that is.

Stodge it seems average for this type of vehicle unfortunately, I rate based on cars in the class, I believe I gave the suzuki a 2 or 1.5.

Benhaze · « **Reply #41 on:** March 09, 2007, 06:59:12 pm »

Thanks Wing. I certainly appreciate your reviews and the real world facts you are reporting here. Some car magazine only do highway runs and their stated fuel economy doesn't mean much. In this case, it demonstrates that a new crossover in not necessarily that much better than other SUVs that have a bad rep.

inco · « **Reply #42 on:** March 10, 2007, 07:07:13 am »

Quote from: wing on March 09, 2007, 01:58:05 pm

Whoops route

Is that a route you take to the washroom before the trots really get you

Or maybe it's the route you take on the way home over icy roads

Or maybe this is what you call a beaten path that's just plain slippery

Or maybe there is a guy down the road whose name really is Whoops and that's the way you have to go to see him - or her.

safristi · « **Reply #43 on:** March 10, 2007, 10:25:16 am »

Whoops .. he's done it again .....Inco has been at the sauce ..............Whoopee stay over last NITE....

wing · « **Reply #44 on:** March 10, 2007, 11:12:02 pm »

No overly impressed by the fuel mileage now that I drove to Toronto and back, I average 12.2L/100km to Toronto and 10.7L/100km on the way back which is about the same as the XL7.

Loudpedal · « **Reply #45 on:** March 12, 2007, 05:35:10 pm »

Quote from: wing on March 10, 2007, 11:12:02 pm

No overly impressed by the fuel mileage now that I drove to Toronto and back, I average 12.2L/100km to Toronto and 10.7L/100km on the way back which is about the same as the XL7.

Any difference in speeds either way? Btw, what would you say was your average speed?

wing · « **Reply #46 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:13:47 pm »

No difference in speed, set my cruise to 120 both directions. Average is obviously less but never really sped up or slowed down much the entire way, traffic was light.

airbalancer · « **Reply #47 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:43:40 pm »

When you drive west on the 401, the wind you are driving into can be pretty bad

stodge · « **Reply #48 on:** March 13, 2007, 11:43:10 am »

Must be uphill all the way to Toronto!

Snowman · « **Reply #49 on:** March 13, 2007, 11:51:55 am »

Quote from: stodge on March 13, 2007, 11:43:10 am

Must be uphill all the way to Toronto!

Sh!t flows downhill

Loudpedal · « **Reply #50 on:** March 13, 2007, 11:54:54 am »

Quote from: Snowman on March 13, 2007, 11:51:55 am

Quote from: stodge on March 13, 2007, 11:43:10 am
Must be uphill all the way to Toronto!
Sh!t flows downhill

Then wing would get better mileage from Ottawa to Toronto...

wing · « **Reply #51 on:** March 13, 2007, 11:56:07 am »

Quote from: stodge on March 13, 2007, 11:43:10 am

Must be uphill all the way to Toronto!

I can't explain the phenomenon but this happens every time I make the trip.

sirAQUAMAN64 · « **Reply #52 on:** March 13, 2007, 12:01:07 pm »

Quote from: airbalancer on March 12, 2007, 07:43:40 pm

When you drive west on the 401, the wind you are driving into can be pretty bad

True from my observations as well.

quadzilla · « **Reply #53 on:** March 13, 2007, 12:10:05 pm »

Quote from: sirAQUAMAN64 on March 13, 2007, 12:01:07 pm

Quote from: airbalancer on March 12, 2007, 07:43:40 pm
When you drive west on the 401, the wind you are driving into can be pretty bad

True from my observations as well.

I second that. I do a lot of trips from Toronto to London and notice the same thing. I think the wind shifts before summer though...at least that is what I noticed on my daily bike commute.

safristi · « **Reply #54 on:** March 13, 2007, 03:23:31 pm »

I ....LIVE WEST of TORONTO.....................Co_inky_DINKY???

...it's a HELL of a Time gettin' past tha MINKIE.......

jim beam · « **Reply #55 on:** March 19, 2007, 06:06:34 pm »

Funny how some people say the chrome grille looks cheap or out of place...usually comments from import owners...wonder if anyone has seen the cheap grill on the new Acura MDX. Looks pretty cheap if you ask me! Overall though the MDX is real nice.
Or how about the new CR-V!! UGLY face and UGLY grille! The rest of the vehicle looks good though. Funny how some just like to jump down the domestic manufacturers throats - oh well.

AVToller · « **Reply #56 on:** March 19, 2007, 08:15:31 pm »

If you will actually go back and look at the comments about the CR-V grill, you will see that a lot of people complained about its appearance.

Mitlov · « **Reply #57 on:** March 20, 2007, 11:20:56 am »

Quote from: jim beam on March 19, 2007, 06:06:34 pm

Funny how some people say the chrome grille looks cheap or out of place...usually comments from import owners...wonder if anyone has seen the cheap grill on the new Acura MDX. Looks pretty cheap if you ask me! Overall though the MDX is real nice.
Or how about the new CR-V!! UGLY face and UGLY grille! The rest of the vehicle looks good though. Funny how some just like to jump down the domestic manufacturers throats - oh well.

I actually like the new MDX's grill. As for the CRV, its new grill was the subject of an eight-month flame-fest on car forums--as it deserved.

Snowman · « **Reply #58 on:** March 20, 2007, 11:25:36 am »

The grill of the Edge works very well with the overall design of the SUV. The CRV’s grill is an error of Tribecaian proportions IMO.

UmroAyyar · « **Reply #59 on:** March 20, 2007, 11:37:37 am »

Murano had a chrome grill and that signature colour.

Edge's styling does its job.

Gets noticed.