Author Topic: History of Mazda  (Read 5316 times)

Offline dorin

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Ottawa
  • Posts: 4873
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • light makes right
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2006, 03:23:05 pm »
They've taken all the sport out of the Civic?  I guess you haven't heard of the Si?  The Integra only died last year as the RSX...I don't consider that "long dead".  I drove both the Civic and the Mazda 3 hatch when shopping for my wife's car (we ended up with a Jetta).  I found the Civic to be tighter and a little more responsive than the Mazda which felt a little pudgy in comparison.

With that said, Mazda is definitely making some fantastic, sporty cars these days.

I've heard of the Si, but I haven't driven one and if it really is that great of a driver's car, then it's not indicative of the run-of-the-mill Civic IMO.  I have driven the regular Civic DX a few times however and there's no doubt in my mind that it's not as sporty of a drive as the Mazda3 GS (the 2.0L version, not even the 2.3L version).  In back-to-back comparisons between the new Civic and the Mz3 I found the Civic to have less road feel, lighter steering and, my pet peeve, underdamped suspension, especially on the rebound.  The differences may seem minor to some but they were glaring to me.   So overall, I have no problem saying that the Civic doesn't qualify as sporty in my books.  Now the Si might be a different kettle of fish but it's also 50% more expensive than a regular Civic and as such is more comparable to the Mazdaspeed3 which I have also not driven.

Having said all that, I don't think the Mz3 is the end-all and be-all of sportiness either.  I also find its steering to be rather uncommunicative, although better than the Civic's, but it's the best I could find for the price.
My favourite MTB site in Ottawa: http://www.mtbkanata.com

Offline Iso Octane

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Toronto
  • Posts: 676
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • to the beat of the different drum
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2006, 05:13:35 pm »
Mattesa, This was a Mazda party.  :banana:
Just got back from a nice drive.  No snow.  So I'm feeling the Mazda love. :drive2:

IMO Honda from the 90s is what Mazda is today.
Yeah, that's probaby a bit more accurate.

Offline Julie

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: KW
  • Posts: 5319
  • Carma: +78/-188
  • Gender: Female
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2006 TSX, 2010 BMW 335i coupe
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2006, 10:47:39 pm »
The website doesn't cover all cars...didn't even have one of my ride back in the 80's


Guess what it is..

That's a beautiful car boytoys, thanks for sharing.  :)

Offline Julie

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: KW
  • Posts: 5319
  • Carma: +78/-188
  • Gender: Female
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2006 TSX, 2010 BMW 335i coupe
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2006, 11:13:44 pm »
Interesting thread.

I haven't tested a lot of cars yet and I don't remember well my Mazda3 test drive two years ago (except that I was very impressed with the car, but couldn't get over my no-so-good previous experience with a 91 Protege), but the Civic Coupe (with tighter suspension than the sedan) felt like it had very good handling to me.

My TSX's handling feels even better.

On the other hand, I felt disappointed with the TL's handling, and I don't remember the 2006 Accord's handling as particularly standing out....

I need to test drive more Mazdas. :)




Offline Arthur Dent

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Lethbridge, AB
  • Posts: 2925
  • Carma: +18/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #24 on: December 12, 2006, 11:18:15 pm »
I drove an 06 Accord V6 and a 04 TSX back to back - the TSX has superior handling by a long shot.

Offline Incredible_NATE

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
  • Posts: 137
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #25 on: December 12, 2006, 11:43:46 pm »
Obviously.

An Accord is a family sedan and the TSX is a sports sedan. So, we can't compare these two cars in drive feel.

The Accord V6 will beat the TSX in accleration though. But that's the only thing. The V6 is furociously fast.

I drove an 06 Accord V6 and a 04 TSX back to back - the TSX has superior handling by a long shot.

mdxtasy

  • Guest
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #26 on: December 12, 2006, 11:47:49 pm »
An Accord is a family sedan and the TSX is a sports sedan. So, we can't compare these two cars in drive feel.

Yet you continually comment on how soft the handling characteristics are and how you wish they firm up the next Accord blah blah blah....flip....flop.

Offline Incredible_NATE

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
  • Posts: 137
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #27 on: December 13, 2006, 12:06:59 am »
There is always something called improvement.

An Accord is a family sedan and the TSX is a sports sedan. So, we can't compare these two cars in drive feel.

Yet you continually comment on how soft the handling characteristics are and how you wish they firm up the next Accord blah blah blah....flip....flop.

mdxtasy

  • Guest
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #28 on: December 13, 2006, 12:13:30 am »
There is always something called improvement.


Can you call something an improvement when you are fundamentally changing a feature/characteristic that is critical to the success of a product?  Changing the Accord's suspension to be more agressive and sporty counters the key market position that the Accord occupies....one of the main advantages of the Accord is the smooth ride and more luxurious float.  Buyers like that....lots of buyers.  Making a stiff Accord isn't considered an improvement for the target market. 

Offline Incredible_NATE

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
  • Posts: 137
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #29 on: December 13, 2006, 12:32:30 am »
Not meaning to change it to be so sporty, but tune it to the sporty side just a bit more. An example of a competitor could be the Saturn Aura; apparantely, that family sedan is suppose to be fun to drive.

There is always something called improvement.


Can you call something an improvement when you are fundamentally changing a feature/characteristic that is critical to the success of a product?  Changing the Accord's suspension to be more agressive and sporty counters the key market position that the Accord occupies....one of the main advantages of the Accord is the smooth ride and more luxurious float.  Buyers like that....lots of buyers.  Making a stiff Accord isn't considered an improvement for the target market. 

Offline Giant Dwarf

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Over Yonder
  • Posts: 10242
  • Carma: +25/-340
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Descending TV
  • Cars: 2008 BMW 335i, 2010 Mazda6 GT
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #30 on: December 13, 2006, 10:05:57 am »
The current Civic Si is, by all accounts, one of the sportiest-handling FWD cars on the market today.  The Mini Cooper may be more agile, but that's it as far as I know.  Sure, the Si completely lacks torque (especially compared to the firebreathing Mazdaspeed3), but it's rev-happy engine, light weight, and razor-sharp handling make it sportier than any version of the Mazda3, in my mind.  The MS3 is awesome, of course, but I don't see it as quite as narrowly focused on pure sport as the Si is. 

Also, in terms of Honda's sportiness, what about the S2000?  By all accounts, it's sharper than the MX-5, though less well-rounded.  [edit: I just remembered that the price gap between a well-equipped MX-5 and the S2000 is much larger in Canada than the States, so this might not be a fair comparison).

I agree, though, that in some areas, Mazda is sportier.  The CX-7 is far, far sportier than a CR-V (and comparisons to the RDX aren't fair because of the huge price gap).  The Mazdaspeed6 versus the Accord V6 6MT?  No contest, the Mazda is worlds sportier.

Ahh... but you (and Dave, and others) are missing the point here.  It's not about comparing Honda Model X to Mazda Model Y to determine which is sportier... it's the fact that Mazda lives up to its marketing hype about putting "Zoom Zoom" in every vehicle they make (again, I offer this position with the exclusion of the rebadged Ford trucks).  Whether you prefer a flimsy, light clutch and over-boosted steering (Honda  :rofl2: ) or kick-in-the-pants turbo boost (Mazda), the fact is that each of Mazda's automobiles have a strong element of driver enjoyment built-in.  With Honda, this is not so.  Pointing out the Si model doesn't mean all Hondas are sporty and fun to drive. 

If Honda was really concerned about maintaining a sporty edge to the consumers' perceptions of their products (the way Mazda is), they'd want to have a competitor that not only meets the standards of the industry (ie. Si, versus GTI, SS SC, MS3... does it really excel at anything against the competitors?) but strives to exceed them.  It's the competitive nature that's borne out of real die-hard auto nuts that obviously worked on the SS SC, SRT cars or Mazdaspeed's division. 

Honda has one sports car.  And while I'll be the first to admit that it's an absolutely lust-worthy machine, it's in the last year of its life now isn't it?  Then what?  And don't even get me started on comparing an S to an MX-5.  Consider what $15,000 worth of parts can do to an MX-5 (the difference in cost between a top of the line GT model MX-5 versus the base price of an S2000).  Would I rather have an S2000?  Sure, but they're leagues apart in terms of price. 

Offline haris

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 557
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #31 on: December 13, 2006, 10:34:05 am »
Honda vs. Mazda?
Let's see... Honda's first car in North America was N600, with 600cc engine and less than 40hp, in 1970.
Mazda's first car in North America was 616, with 1.6l engine, 105hp. One could opt for a Wankel engine (130hp) and make it into RX-2.

Honda made their name selling tiny slow commuter cars.
Mazda made their name selling fun to drive cars.
Ask someone who's been around in '70s what Honda and Mazda cars they remember and if they remember anything about them... the above bit about commuters and fun is what you'll get.

Back to the thread, and it's about Mazda.

Mazda Cosmo, introduction of rotary engine, 1967


Not only was this car the first to sport the rotary, it was the car that started RX cars for Mazda...


Offline Panzer

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Location: Ottawa
  • Posts: 799
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #32 on: December 13, 2006, 10:42:03 am »
My 81 Rx-7 and 86 B2000 were bullet proof.

Really?  No rotary engine woes?

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #33 on: December 13, 2006, 10:46:01 am »
"I LUV TO WANKEL".......oom OOM !!!............Buddy in VanHoofer had one of those early Rx2 Wankleydoodles...wot a lil rocket...tinny as hell but went like STIG-NK..!!!
  Took Him about 13 seconds to go from one end of Robson to the other......even whilst scoping the CHIX :run:
THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Lethbridge, AB
  • Posts: 2925
  • Carma: +18/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #34 on: December 13, 2006, 11:02:20 am »
Honda vs. Mazda?
Let's see... Honda's first car in North America was N600, with 600cc engine and less than 40hp, in 1970.
Mazda's first car in North America was 616, with 1.6l engine, 105hp. One could opt for a Wankel engine (130hp) and make it into RX-2.

Honda made their name selling tiny slow commuter cars.
Mazda made their name selling fun to drive cars.
Ask someone who's been around in '70s what Honda and Mazda cars they remember and if they remember anything about them... the above bit about commuters and fun is what you'll get.

Back to the thread, and it's about Mazda.

Mazda Cosmo, introduction of rotary engine, 1967


Not only was this car the first to sport the rotary, it was the car that started RX cars for Mazda...



actually the NSU Spider was the first rotary powered production car. Still Mazda made it work.


Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Bethlehem
  • Posts: 40872
  • Carma: +141/-51
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #35 on: December 13, 2006, 11:11:32 am »
 NSUFERASTU...Now that woz scary....... :rofl:

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Lethbridge, AB
  • Posts: 2925
  • Carma: +18/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #36 on: December 13, 2006, 11:24:43 am »
My 81 Rx-7 and 86 B2000 were bullet proof.

Really?  No rotary engine woes?

nope - the Rx-7 was awesome - just an add oil and gas kinda car. Properly maintained the N/A rotary engines go almost forever.

Offline dave

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 640
  • Carma: +7/-52
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • www.clownpenis.fart
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #37 on: December 13, 2006, 01:35:14 pm »
The current Civic Si is, by all accounts, one of the sportiest-handling FWD cars on the market today.  The Mini Cooper may be more agile, but that's it as far as I know.  Sure, the Si completely lacks torque (especially compared to the firebreathing Mazdaspeed3), but it's rev-happy engine, light weight, and razor-sharp handling make it sportier than any version of the Mazda3, in my mind.  The MS3 is awesome, of course, but I don't see it as quite as narrowly focused on pure sport as the Si is. 

Also, in terms of Honda's sportiness, what about the S2000?  By all accounts, it's sharper than the MX-5, though less well-rounded.  [edit: I just remembered that the price gap between a well-equipped MX-5 and the S2000 is much larger in Canada than the States, so this might not be a fair comparison).

I agree, though, that in some areas, Mazda is sportier.  The CX-7 is far, far sportier than a CR-V (and comparisons to the RDX aren't fair because of the huge price gap).  The Mazdaspeed6 versus the Accord V6 6MT?  No contest, the Mazda is worlds sportier.

Ahh... but you (and Dave, and others) are missing the point here.  It's not about comparing Honda Model X to Mazda Model Y to determine which is sportier... it's the fact that Mazda lives up to its marketing hype about putting "Zoom Zoom" in every vehicle they make (again, I offer this position with the exclusion of the rebadged Ford trucks).  Whether you prefer a flimsy, light clutch and over-boosted steering (Honda  :rofl2: ) or kick-in-the-pants turbo boost (Mazda), the fact is that each of Mazda's automobiles have a strong element of driver enjoyment built-in.  With Honda, this is not so.  Pointing out the Si model doesn't mean all Hondas are sporty and fun to drive. 

If Honda was really concerned about maintaining a sporty edge to the consumers' perceptions of their products (the way Mazda is), they'd want to have a competitor that not only meets the standards of the industry (ie. Si, versus GTI, SS SC, MS3... does it really excel at anything against the competitors?) but strives to exceed them.  It's the competitive nature that's borne out of real die-hard auto nuts that obviously worked on the SS SC, SRT cars or Mazdaspeed's division. 

Honda has one sports car.  And while I'll be the first to admit that it's an absolutely lust-worthy machine, it's in the last year of its life now isn't it?  Then what?  And don't even get me started on comparing an S to an MX-5.  Consider what $15,000 worth of parts can do to an MX-5 (the difference in cost between a top of the line GT model MX-5 versus the base price of an S2000).  Would I rather have an S2000?  Sure, but they're leagues apart in terms of price. 

Jeff, what makes you think I missed the point?  I never said Honda has a sportier line overall...I was just commented that there is in fact a sporty Civic (the Si) and that I found the Civic EX better than the Mazda 3. 

If I had to say who has more interesting cars in their lineup...Mazda vs. Honda...I would definitely say Mazda.

Offline Giant Dwarf

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Over Yonder
  • Posts: 10242
  • Carma: +25/-340
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Descending TV
  • Cars: 2008 BMW 335i, 2010 Mazda6 GT
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #38 on: December 13, 2006, 01:40:25 pm »
Jeff, what makes you think I missed the point?  I never said Honda has a sportier line overall...I was just commented that there is in fact a sporty Civic (the Si) and that I found the Civic EX better than the Mazda 3. 

If I had to say who has more interesting cars in their lineup...Mazda vs. Honda...I would definitely say Mazda.

Well... alright then.  Don't let it happen again.   :shuffle:

Offline Julie

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: KW
  • Posts: 5319
  • Carma: +78/-188
  • Gender: Female
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2006 TSX, 2010 BMW 335i coupe
Re: History of Mazda
« Reply #39 on: December 13, 2006, 08:02:25 pm »
Interesting thread.

I haven't tested a lot of cars yet and I don't remember well my Mazda3 test drive two years ago (except that I was very impressed with the car, but couldn't get over my no-so-good previous experience with a 91 Protege), but the Civic Coupe (with tighter suspension than the sedan) felt like it had very good handling to me.

My TSX's handling feels even better.

On the other hand, I felt disappointed with the TL's handling, and I don't remember the 2006 Accord's handling as particularly standing out....

I need to test drive more Mazdas. :)




Hey Julie, what was your bad experience with the '91 Protege? I always loved Mazdas and owned 3 in the past but would like to forget my '91. It was awful.

- Premature rusting in B pillar area (dealer said it was known and kept paying for repairs), then the moonroof mechanism after 5 years.
- Paint fade, to the point that there were different patches of color after 3 years (many asked, was your car repainted?) 
- Rather strong vibrations at idle.

- (Minor stuff: you had to yell to the person sitting next to you on the highway to talk, it wasn't very economical, nor very sporty...)

What happened to your '91?