Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ford of Canada annouinces 2007 Fusion AWD MSRP  (Read 5470 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cord
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2006, 04:50:57 pm »

Quote
There's not a lot of used Fusions out there yet.  So I could only work with what's available.  I doubt the "AWD" and "V6" features will account for that large of a difference though.  The depreciation gap is more likely due to a real or perceived quality difference between the Ford brand and Subaru.  Time will prove me right or wrong.

Doing a quick Canada-wide search of 2006 Fusions shows 54 results. Interesting how you choose to post the cheapest one on there which happens to be $2000 cheaper than the second cheapest one. There over 20 Fusions priced over $26000.
Logged
ScoobyDriver
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Sport Wagon
Gender: Male
Location: Fredericton NB
Posts: 71

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2006, 05:26:43 pm »

It's also interesting how I posted the cheapest Legacy that had close to the same km's.  That was the whole point of my comparison! 

Quote
There's not a lot of used Fusions out there yet.  So I could only work with what's available.  I doubt the "AWD" and "V6" features will account for that large of a difference though.  The depreciation gap is more likely due to a real or perceived quality difference between the Ford brand and Subaru.  Time will prove me right or wrong.

Doing a quick Canada-wide search of 2006 Fusions shows 54 results. Interesting how you choose to post the cheapest one on there which happens to be $2000 cheaper than the second cheapest one. There over 20 Fusions priced over $26000.
Logged
ScoobyDriver
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Sport Wagon
Gender: Male
Location: Fredericton NB
Posts: 71

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2006, 05:58:29 pm »

I forgot to mention this fact too.  I was looking at the SEL's since they're the top model.  So reduce your 54 result because it includes SE's.  I was viewing models that had a price listed - reduce your result for thsoe who don't include a price or list a lease price.  I was looking at models that had the KM's listed - reduce your result for all those that don't list the KM's. 

When you take a look at that number I'd say there's not a lot of Fusions to make a direct comparison (54 in all of Canada also seems like not a lot of Fusions to me to begin with).  As for it being the cheapest.  Yes - it is.  You can pay 2k more for the same car.  I'm going to go for the better deal.

It's also interesting how I posted the cheapest Legacy that had close to the same km's.  That was the whole point of my comparison! 

Quote
There's not a lot of used Fusions out there yet.  So I could only work with what's available.  I doubt the "AWD" and "V6" features will account for that large of a difference though.  The depreciation gap is more likely due to a real or perceived quality difference between the Ford brand and Subaru.  Time will prove me right or wrong.

Doing a quick Canada-wide search of 2006 Fusions shows 54 results. Interesting how you choose to post the cheapest one on there which happens to be $2000 cheaper than the second cheapest one. There over 20 Fusions priced over $26000.
Logged
MKII
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2007 Ford Focus Ghia SW 1.6l TI-VCT
Location: Tallinn Estonia
Posts: 2413


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #23 on: September 27, 2006, 06:12:57 pm »

The Fusions gene pool starts from a $23,000 price level, the Legacy from $28,000 price level. Size wise these vehicles are similar but segment  reality is quite different. The Legacy is playing in the TSX, S40,  level.

When you go on about the depreciation factor, well no sherlock, the consumers perception of Ford in general is at an all time low.

For all the negative I shed on Ford, you have to give them credit for even offering a AWD sedan in this segment. Who would've thought that 10 years ago Ford would be selling a midsize car with AWD in North America.
Logged
Cord
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #24 on: September 27, 2006, 06:16:50 pm »

Top wholesale values as published in Canadian Black Book:

2006 Fusion SEL V6 $22300
2006 Legacy $22600

Looks a lot closer than the approx. $10,000 difference that is being claimed.

« Last Edit: September 27, 2006, 06:20:30 pm by Cord » Logged
MKII
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2007 Ford Focus Ghia SW 1.6l TI-VCT
Location: Tallinn Estonia
Posts: 2413


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #25 on: September 27, 2006, 07:04:37 pm »

Cord what are the 24, 36 & 48 residuals on the Fusion?
Logged
Cord
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2006, 07:15:05 pm »

For 25,000km/yr

SE: 58, 51, 43
SEL: 57, 51, 43

For 20,000km/yr add 2%

*these are for FWD. AWD residuals n/a yet.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2006, 07:19:38 pm by Cord » Logged
MKII
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2007 Ford Focus Ghia SW 1.6l TI-VCT
Location: Tallinn Estonia
Posts: 2413


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #27 on: September 27, 2006, 07:18:14 pm »

Thanks Cord Thumbs up
Logged
ScoobyDriver
Learner's Permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Sport Wagon
Gender: Male
Location: Fredericton NB
Posts: 71

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2006, 08:08:57 pm »

Interesting numbers.  The resudual on my 36 mo Impreza 20k/yr lease is 50.  Making the residual value 12500.  But if you try finding a used 2003 impreza with 60,000 k on it - good luck finding one for 12500. 

The market will determine what the value is going to be in 2, 3, 4 years - not some pencil pusher.  The Fusion came out in Oct 2005 as an 06 model I believe so we'll see what they're really worth in 24, 36, 48.  Having said this I think Ford's making great strides in improving customer perception of quality and probably in actual quality.  If I was going to buy an AWD Fusion I'd look at a 3 yr lease with that residual value protecting me from hefty depreciation (residual on the AWD might be better - but it's n/a yet according to Cord)) - as long as it was a good rate. The 3-4 yr resudual difference is big.  I got .8% with my Subaru.  I should be able to sell my Impreza privately for more than my resudual if I choose to at the time. 

I could try to buy a 4 year old Fusion if I wait a little...  Or maybe I'd look at an 07 Sebring  ROFL  They might be giving those away in 4 years.
Logged
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 21003



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #29 on: September 28, 2006, 06:35:45 am »

For all the negative I shed on Ford, you have to give them credit for even offering a AWD sedan in this segment. Who would've thought that 10 years ago Ford would be selling a midsize car with AWD in North America.

I agree, not many makers in this segment at this pricing. This is one example in Ford’s shift to profitability and establishing a market perception and I applaud them. The true measure of the effort will be in four years so any comments are just speculation.
Logged

Shemp
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Location: here nor there
Posts: 274

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2006, 07:52:16 am »

I find the fusion to be one of the most attractive cars on the market and have considered purchasing one. My wifes 01 Focus and its amount of problems have left me a little gunshy.that said , after spending quite abit of time driving my in-laws Legacies and hearing about there problems , I would be quite hesitant to purchase one of those also.
Logged
y2chuck
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2012 Mazda5, 2011 Ford Fiesta, 2008 Ford Mustang V6 Convertible
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 1422



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2006, 09:05:21 am »

I drove an 06 Fusion SEL a while back, it's a really nice family car.  My biggest complaint was the engine.  Seemed very sluggish compared to the Mazda6 GT even tho it's the same engine.  The manual shift auto makes a big difference. Otherwise it handled great, rode great, nice interior (albeit a cheaper upper dash plastic) and there is tons of room in it (big trunk, huge back seat with lotsa leg room).

Do they offer any extra content in the AWD model compared to the non-AWD models?
Logged

Current Cars: 2012 Mazda5 GS, 2011 Ford Fiesta SE Hackback
MKII
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2007 Ford Focus Ghia SW 1.6l TI-VCT
Location: Tallinn Estonia
Posts: 2413


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2006, 09:29:42 am »

I drove an 06 Fusion SEL a while back, it's a really nice family car.  My biggest complaint was the engine.  Seemed very sluggish compared to the Mazda6 GT even tho it's the same engine.  The manual shift auto makes a big difference. Otherwise it handled great, rode great, nice interior (albeit a cheaper upper dash plastic) and there is tons of room in it (big trunk, huge back seat with lotsa leg room).

Do they offer any extra content in the AWD model compared to the non-AWD models?

No extra content in the AWD variants, only difference is the AWD fuel tank on the ADW is 63l, compared to 66l on the FWD.
Logged
si
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: si
Gender: Male
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3907



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2006, 10:00:22 pm »

Still no manual tranny?  I'd pass.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 35 queries.