Author Topic: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005  (Read 2644 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3206
  • Carma: +50/-5
  • member
    • View Profile
CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« on: March 16, 2006, 01:15:05 am »
Used Vehicle Review:
GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005

2002 GMC YukonGeneral Motors knows a thing or two about building big trucks, says Chris Chase. "Reliability is a little below average," he says, and "crash safety is only about average." Among the models available - Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade -  "The best deals are to be found among lower-end versions of the Tahoe and Yukon," he says.        More...

Offline Bullet Blue

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Dartmouth, NS
  • Posts: 6795
  • Carma: +9/-19
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Re: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2006, 09:57:35 am »
WIth those resale prices and the models virtually unchanged for 5 years, the 50 cent wannabe's will be happy to pick one up used and throw some chrome rims on it  :rofl:

I swear, I'm seeing so many older Yukons and Escalade's now a days driven by 17 year old males with chrome rims. Just me?

Offline Howswedeitis

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Location: Canada
  • Posts: 147
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2006, 11:45:02 am »
Yeah...and those kids will quickly learn "image" comes at a price...
a buck a litre for gas...now that will make their "DUBS" spin!

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Board Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
  • Posts: 13372
  • Carma: +1/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2006, 01:13:26 pm »
I'm surprised it took so long for the US coastal urban trend to make its way up here.

Gas doesn't seem to be coming down anytime soon, if ever. I've driven these trucks, and I don't know how people can do it. They're expensive, and even if I could afford it, I don't know why I would want to. Must admit, they make great couches on wheels, but I found the 3rd row shockingly small for such a large vehicle. A Sienna AWD would make a much better option for both people and cargo, but just doesn't look aggressive or masculine enough I guess.
AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!

Offline airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Cobourg Ontario
  • Posts: 15974
  • Carma: +92/-89
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2000 BMW 323, 2010 Toyota Prius, 2011Chevy Silverado LTZ
Re: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2006, 02:08:29 pm »
probably the drive seat is much more comfortable then  minivans. Mind you I have not drive one for 7 years

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
  • Posts: 10333
  • Carma: +62/-80
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: GM full-size SUVs, 2000-2005
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2006, 05:37:57 pm »
just doesn't look aggressive or masculine enough I guess.

Ya can't drive a Sienna if you're concerned about the size of your...
No place I'd rather be...