Author Topic: 2007 Chevy Avalanche  (Read 4149 times)

Offline Bullet Blue

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Dartmouth, NS
  • Posts: 6795
  • Carma: +9/-19
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
2007 Chevy Avalanche
« on: February 01, 2006, 11:10:23 am »

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2006, 11:31:28 am »
That ain’t no Ridgeline.

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Board Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
  • Posts: 13372
  • Carma: +1/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2006, 11:48:23 am »
I read the comments and thought the same Snowman.
Not to mention Avalanche came first, and the new styling is evolutionary.

The interior of the new GM's and fantastic. Really.
But the pricing is bound to be thousands more than a RidgeLine.
AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!

Offline G0dspd

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Ottawa, ON
  • Posts: 2591
  • Carma: +8/-1
  • Gender: Male
  • Vroum Vroum
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2006, 03:18:49 pm »
That ain’t no Ridgeline.

I agree ... the Ridgeline ain't no truck!  ;D  The new styling looks great but they could've done a better job with the grey plastic supports.

Also, the "old" Avalanche is already more expensive than the Ridgeline ... it's a full-size truck not a minivan in disguise.

2005 Chevrolet Avalanche     40 400$ - 50 960$
2005 Honda Ridgeline           35 200$ - 44 400$
« Last Edit: February 01, 2006, 03:23:18 pm by G0dspd »
"Can we make this quick? I have to give a banana to Annie's Boobs."

Offline si

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: West Coast
  • Posts: 3907
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2006, 01:35:29 am »
I'm FULLY impressed by the Ridgeline, and to me  there would be no other truck I would want.

The Avalanche and it's GM clones can go away.

Offline inco

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Ontaaaarrrrio
  • Posts: 6868
  • Carma: +2/-19
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2006, 08:59:03 am »
I'm FULLY impressed by the Ridgeline, and to me  there would be no other truck I would want.

The Avalanche and it's GM clones can go away.

But laddie you've got to live a little now and then and there's no living like the rumble of a mighty V8.

The Honda is a great vehicle (not truck) but it isn't a truck and the V8 makes the Chevy an awesome hauler. Been there and know that. But I too would probably consider the Honda only because I no longer want the big truck.

Still you should try these things out and see first hand that things have changed even if it doesn't meet your needs. They won't go away either - too many people love 'em.


Offline si

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: West Coast
  • Posts: 3907
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2006, 10:56:01 am »
I'm FULLY impressed by the Ridgeline, and to me  there would be no other truck I would want.

The Avalanche and it's GM clones can go away.

But laddie you've got to live a little now and then and there's no living like the rumble of a mighty V8.

The Honda is a great vehicle (not truck) but it isn't a truck and the V8 makes the Chevy an awesome hauler. Been there and know that. But I too would probably consider the Honda only because I no longer want the big truck.

Still you should try these things out and see first hand that things have changed even if it doesn't meet your needs. They won't go away either - too many people love 'em.



true.  But unless you are towing, or want to go fast (in a truck?), why bother with the V8?  Personally the Ridgline TRUCK has more utility and would suit my needs more than any other.

Offline airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Cobourg Ontario
  • Posts: 15973
  • Carma: +92/-89
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2000 BMW 323, 2010 Toyota Prius, 2011Chevy Silverado LTZ
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2006, 09:01:39 pm »
I'm FULLY impressed by the Ridgeline, and to me  there would be no other truck I would want.

The Avalanche and it's GM clones can go away.

But laddie you've got to live a little now and then and there's no living like the rumble of a mighty V8.

The Honda is a great vehicle (not truck) but it isn't a truck and the V8 makes the Chevy an awesome hauler. Been there and know that. But I too would probably consider the Honda only because I no longer want the big truck.

Still you should try these things out and see first hand that things have changed even if it doesn't meet your needs. They won't go away either - too many people love 'em.



true.  But unless you are towing, or want to go fast (in a truck?), why bother with the V8?  Personally the Ridgline TRUCK has more utility and would suit my needs more than any other.

I can see someone has not been out in a 5.3l yes they can go fast.
I can not see how a Rigdeline has mor utility then a Ava.

You can low the the back of a Ava and put a 4x8 sheet in the back.
It come with a cover so you can lock things in the back. the cab is bigger.
I guess we need truck people to talk about trucks.

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2006, 09:09:08 pm »
Trucks that I have known:

1986 Ford F-150 4x4 Regular Cab Regular Box
1991 Ford F-150 Lariat 4x4 Super Cab Short Box
1994 Dodge Ram 4x4 Regular Cab Regular Box
1995 GMC Sierra SLE Extended Cab Short Box
1997 GMC Jimmy 4x4 SLT
1999 GMC Jimmy 4x4 SLT
2001 Ford F-150 Lariat 4x4 Super Cab Short Box
2002 Toyota Highlander 4x4 V6
« Last Edit: February 02, 2006, 09:25:06 pm by Mccombie 5 »

Offline AVToller

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: At home in NS
  • Posts: 10170
  • Carma: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Going to the dogs
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2006, 09:22:41 pm »
"1901 Ford F-150 Lariat 4x4 Super Cab Short Box"

Must have been a real collector's item!  :rofl2:
Retired, married, and loving it
Ross

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2006, 09:25:24 pm »
"1901 Ford F-150 Lariat 4x4 Super Cab Short Box"

Must have been a real collector's item!  :rofl2:


asre hole  ;)

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Board Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
  • Posts: 13372
  • Carma: +1/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2006, 12:03:39 pm »
Well I'm impressed by the new GM's, that's for sure.

RidgeLine pricing is really good tho, I must admit.

mr_meow

  • Guest
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2006, 01:09:35 pm »
this and its brother the caddy is the most stupid pick-up ever created by man - its totally useless and drinks a lot petrol and can't carry more than a shopping bag


.

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2006, 01:26:29 pm »
this and its brother the caddy is the most stupid pick-up ever created by man - its totally useless and drinks a lot petrol and can't carry more than a shopping bag


.

Mr. Meow the last three posts you have made have been all negative. Have you nothing good to say? The Chevy Avalanche has been a good reliability and quality story for GM. Before you post negative statements regarding a specific vehicle please do your homework and have factual data to back up your claims.

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2006, 01:30:35 pm »
Consumer Reports:

Chevrolet Avalanche

REPORT CARD
________________________________________
Highs: Cargo versatility, ride, quietness, standard stability control, full-time four-wheel-drive system.
Lows: Fussy to convert midgate, fuel economy, tire grip, visibility, turning circle.

The Avalanche is a full-sized, crew-cab pickup with a unified bed and cab. An innovative "midgate" at the back of the cab can be folded down and the rear glass removed to extend the cargo bed into the rear of the cabin. Along with a standard three-piece removable bed cover, this gives the Avalanche flexibility and versatility. Fussing with all the pieces, however, can be tedious. Rear visibility is very poor. The 5.3-liter V8 provides impressive acceleration but is thirsty. The ride is comfortable and quiet. The four-wheel-drive system can remain engaged indefinitely--a plus. Reliability has been average.

mr_meow

  • Guest
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #15 on: February 03, 2006, 01:39:36 pm »
Mccombie 5 I never said anything about reliablity - its just that its hopeless at being a pick-up - its not a real pick up - they hardly anything you can stick in the back of them - if want to talk about reliabity they only score a 3 in a JD power survey

http://www.edmunds.com/used/2002/chevrolet/avalanche/100002135/ratings_jdpower.html
.

Offline si

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: West Coast
  • Posts: 3907
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2006, 05:22:44 am »
I'm FULLY impressed by the Ridgeline, and to me  there would be no other truck I would want.

The Avalanche and it's GM clones can go away.

But laddie you've got to live a little now and then and there's no living like the rumble of a mighty V8.

The Honda is a great vehicle (not truck) but it isn't a truck and the V8 makes the Chevy an awesome hauler. Been there and know that. But I too would probably consider the Honda only because I no longer want the big truck.

Still you should try these things out and see first hand that things have changed even if it doesn't meet your needs. They won't go away either - too many people love 'em.



true.  But unless you are towing, or want to go fast (in a truck?), why bother with the V8?  Personally the Ridgline TRUCK has more utility and would suit my needs more than any other.

I can see someone has not been out in a 5.3l yes they can go fast.
I can not see how a Rigdeline has mor utility then a Ava.

You can low the the back of a Ava and put a 4x8 sheet in the back.
It come with a cover so you can lock things in the back. the cab is bigger.
I guess we need truck people to talk about trucks.

It's true I've never owned a truck, although I may need one for property development.   I took a good look at the current trucks on the market and the Ridgeline most impressed me.  I've driven the F150 along with others and was only more impressed with bed space.

The unibody construction + excellent handling, safety, relative fuel efficiency, comfort, cabin space, trunk space (yes, trunk under the bed), and durability don't come in a better package.  For someone like me not in need of holding a 4X8, the Ridgeline is very attractive.  I guess the question is though, for those that don't need the bed utility to carry a 4X8 or related tools, why not just get an SUV?  I just know that Honda will bring in new segment buyers, like myself.

As far as the common truck V8 goes in terms of performance, yes, they are fast.  From my experience driving them I really hate how 80% of the time when you have no loads and are driving city traffic, the V8 is loudly churning along while gulping fuel.  You can hear the engine pumping power (and gas) regardless of utilizing a heavy load and it feels so inefficient.  FOR ME, a diesel or Ridgline fit the bill in the truck category.


Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Oakville
  • Posts: 21599
  • Carma: +45/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD. 2004 Honda S2000
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2006, 09:20:05 am »
Mccombie 5 I never said anything about reliablity - its just that its hopeless at being a pick-up - its not a real pick up - they hardly anything you can stick in the back of them - if want to talk about reliabity they only score a 3 in a JD power survey

http://www.edmunds.com/used/2002/chevrolet/avalanche/100002135/ratings_jdpower.html
.

 ??? JD Powers is an industry funded group that have little creability with “real” automotive people. It is just an advertising arm of the auto industry to self promote vehicles well within the warranty period.

Offline G0dspd

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Ottawa, ON
  • Posts: 2591
  • Carma: +8/-1
  • Gender: Male
  • Vroum Vroum
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #18 on: February 04, 2006, 04:03:55 pm »
I guess the question is though, for those that don't need the bed utility to carry a 4X8 or related tools, why not just get an SUV?

SUVs are relatively more expensive, the space in the back is very limited (even worse if you have the spare back there), the towing capacity is usually diminished, you are limited in height, there's the whole dirt issue, real SUVs have useless gadgets for harcore off-roading ... bla bla bla ... there's tons of reason why SUVs can't replace a truck.  But you're right ... if you just want a "off-road minivan", SUVs are the answer.

The Ridgeline is for peoplle who want to haul groceries or small objects... what else can you do with a 5' box?  You can't even put a dirt bike back there with the gate closed.  That 2-way gate was tried by Ford a few years ago and it didn't last very long ... but the Ridgeline is not for the truck market so maybe it'll work this time.  They could call it the Pilot EXT ... it's basically a SUV with a small box in the back.

Offline barrie1

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: London Ont Canada
  • Posts: 14832
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 Chevy Avalanche
« Reply #19 on: February 04, 2006, 08:35:53 pm »
The Avalanche is in the real truck market for a reason. The new ones are actually getting much improved gas milage over the older ones as well. It has also been around a lot longer then the Ridgeline as well. I am a owner of a full sized pickup from GM and know just how verstile it can be as well. Mine is only a day cab with the 8ft box on it but rides almost as good as a car. Even better with a heavy load on it. For some owners the Ridgekine will serve them very well but for many who need a real truck for heavier work or play or anything else the Av is a very good answer. The GM trucks come with a big 6cyl engine as well if that is your need. I don't know if you can order the Av with the 6cyl but all of the other models I beleive you can. Maybe with exception of the Caddy model as well.  I have a friend who works at GM and is on his 6th AV as he deals every 6 months. He can have any truck he wants but really likes these.  :)