Autos.ca Home  


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2006 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx SS  (Read 4538 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2732

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: January 15, 2006, 11:03:01 pm »

You may discuss our cover story of the day in this thread....
Test Drive:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx SS

2006 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx SSWith a hatchback/wagon bodystyle and a wheelbase that is 152-millimetres longer than the Malibu sedan, the Malibu Maxx has more interior room and a flexible cargo area, reports Paul Williams.  The 'SS' model adds more horsepower, bigger tires and wheels and more performance features.       More...
Logged
The Mighty Duck
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 7036


the mighty duck


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2006, 11:22:25 pm »

I'm undecided on the looks of the Malibu Max...  on the one hand, I like it.  But on the other, I'm not sure I'd want to drive a car that looks like this.

*shrug*

None of GM's products do a whole lot for me, and the Malibu is just another "Oh...  okay." sort of car.  For that money, it would not be my first choice.  Probably not even in my top five...
Logged

Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
AVToller
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Subaru Forester Touring, Sage green
Gender: Male
Location: At home in NS
Posts: 10170


Going to the dogs


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2006, 11:31:34 pm »

I've always been a hatchback/wagon lover, but I saw a Maxx "up close and personal" yesterday, and it just looked wrong somehow. The proportions just didn't seem to work.  Huh Tongue
Logged

Retired, married, and loving it
Ross
random006
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2003 Kia Sorento EX
Gender: Male
Location: Montreal, QC.
Posts: 4930



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2006, 11:45:09 pm »

I've always been a hatchback/wagon lover, but I saw a Maxx "up close and personal" yesterday, and it just looked wrong somehow. The proportions just didn't seem to work.  Huh Tongue

Interesting comment.  It might explain why I seem to be looking at two different cars depending on whether I'm viewing it from the front or the rear.  I don't like its front but the rear is quite attractive.  I've seen quite a few Maxx's over the last 6 or 7 months and my opinion has not changed.

Overall, though, I think it has some of the most potential of all the new "mainstream" or "daily driver" models to come out of the GM braintrust.  In short, lumping it in with the latest Corvette would be grossly unfair.  Grin
Logged
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Stage 2 2010 WRX STi, 2004 Honda S 2000, 2011 Toyota Venza, and Mom's 1996 Nissan Pathfinder
Gender: Male
Location: Oakville
Posts: 20999



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2006, 06:45:42 am »

GM should take a page from DC and FORD and at least make some of their cars look interesting.
Logged

airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 14901



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2006, 07:02:32 am »

GM should take a page from DC and FORD and at least make some of their cars look interesting.
I Agree

that is one of GM's biggest problems
Logged
Shnak
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Hyundai Sonata I4 Limited w/Nav, 2006 Kia Sportage LX-V6 AWD
Gender: Male
Location: Hull
Posts: 7308


New toy! :)


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2006, 09:23:47 am »

GM should take a page from DC and FORD and at least make some of their cars look interesting.

IMO, other than the Mustang, I don't think GM has many design lessons to learn from Ford... Ford doesn't have any G6 or Soltstice in its lineup... those are two very well done designs...
Logged

Bullet Blue
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 6775



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2006, 09:24:08 am »

At least they got rid of that huge chrome bar that they pasted across the grille of the old malibu. Roll Eyes

A friend of mine has one of these. I agree, looks very odd. I think it has something to do with the rear. I can't quite say why. Maybe because the hatch isn't rounded off? Or they wanted it to be a hatch, but tried to make it look like a sedan somewhow? I don't know.
Logged
mdxtasy
Guest

« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2006, 09:28:08 am »

The fit on the right side of the centre stack seems to be mis-aligned.  Or is that just from the angle of the picture?
http://www.canadiandriver.com/cgi-bin/schlabo/sp.pl?/photos/2006/chevrolet/malibu-maxx/06maxxss_9.jpg&info=2006%20Chevrolet%20Malibu%20Maxx%20SS

As for the vehicle, I think it's alright.  The versatility is the trump card, being a hatch and all, but the extreme sloping rear glass does cut into cargo capacity.  For the $35K, it's priced with much of the competitors looking for a 240hp 6 banger family hauler....the question is...can it hold its own with the perinnial favorites like the Honda Accord?  How about a Nissan Altima?  These match power numbers of the Maxx SS but gives up a bit in the trunk no hatch configuration.  If you can stomach a few less ponies, a Mazda 6 hatch or sportback offers similar setup....and can save a few dollars.  How about the Acura TSX?  Near luxury, good handling, and less ponies.  Same price. 
Logged
chrischasescars
WingMan
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Whatever they're paying me to drive this week
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 929


Automotive journalism ninja


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2006, 09:56:19 am »

The fit on the right side of the centre stack seems to be mis-aligned.  Or is that just from the angle of the picture?
 

Looks like a shadow to me.

GM's build-quality issues aside, I love the Maxx and would gladly drive one, for the cargo flexibility alone. It doesn't hurt that I love the way it looks. Sure it's odd, but I think it works. To me, the Maxx is a nifty evolution of the mid-size station wagon.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2006, 11:48:22 am by stickshift » Logged

Buy this car to drive to work; Drive to work to pay for this car.
I write stuff here: ThisIsWhatIThinkOfYourCar.com
I sing stuff here: ChrisChasesCars.bandcamp.com/
mdxtasy
Guest

« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2006, 10:31:52 am »

Like BB says, the front looks so much better without that front chrome eyebrow thing.  It's a good looking vehicle.  A bit bland but so are the competitors for the most part.  The Maxx is probably not a $35K vehicle, I can see good value and content for a family without the SS trim.  Like stickshift says, good versatility.
Logged
Bullet Blue
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 6775



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2006, 11:24:05 am »

Who has Chevy listed as its competitors? Mazda 6 hatch or even the wagon?
Logged
The Mighty Duck
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 7036


the mighty duck


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2006, 01:19:20 pm »

Quote
IMO, other than the Mustang, I don't think GM has many design lessons to learn from Ford... Ford doesn't have any G6 or Soltstice in its lineup... those are two very well done designs...

I agree...  Chev missed the boat on the Malibu, but some of the offerings from Saab, Pontiac, and even Hummer (if you're into that sort of thing) are pretty solid.  Ford is, in a word, boring.  The new Fusion is okay, and the Mustang is good...  what else?

Dodge has style down, imho.
Logged

Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
sirAQUAMAN64
Board Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagen TDI Comfortline 6MT. 2009 Dodge Ram 1500 Crew Cab Sport 4X4
Gender: Male
Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
Posts: 13358



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2006, 01:23:46 pm »

That hatchback parcel tier shelf/divider thingie really bothers me. It's hard... it's bulky... frustrating to remove, and when you do more than likely you'll scratch the side lining of the trunk when you fiddle with it... and it has to be moved all the time as opening the trunk does not automatically lift it. It's a supremely annoying contraption!  Angry

I like the Maxx though. Interesting shape... great sliding rear seating area, and sunlight. Front seats really are suitable for just any driver - no exageration. The base V6 is quite fuel efficient as well. Good deal at mid-$20G's - not so much above $30Gs. The base seats are more comfy and look better to me too.

The Saturn Aura should have more fashion sense with a large interior, to complement the G6.
Logged

AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1997 Ford Ranger; 2012 Hyundai Veloster tech package.
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 40331



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: January 16, 2006, 01:24:01 pm »

Barrie ....what happened to the "MALIBOU MAXX!!?..... Wink........drillin fer oil inna Alaska PARKS?
Logged

THERE IS NO CURE FOR "LOTUS"......ONLY TREATMENT.....
AVToller
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Subaru Forester Touring, Sage green
Gender: Male
Location: At home in NS
Posts: 10170


Going to the dogs


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #15 on: January 16, 2006, 01:30:29 pm »



Dodge has style down, imho.

 I Agree You can't get much lower stying than that.  Tongue Grin
Logged

Retired, married, and loving it
Ross
Scaerio
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Renault Clio, 2005 Suzuki Aerio (in storage)
Gender: Male
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3951



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #16 on: January 16, 2006, 01:51:55 pm »

The MAXX reminds me of a Renault 21 (Medallion to us) hatch... ...from the late '80s/mid '90s.

Logged

-Ken

SAAB: automobile design inspired by Salvador Dali on an absinthe bender.
Bullet Blue
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 6775



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #17 on: January 16, 2006, 03:02:10 pm »

That hatchback parcel tier shelf/divider thingie really bothers me. It's hard... it's bulky... frustrating to remove, and when you do more than likely you'll scratch the side lining of the trunk when you fiddle with it... and it has to be moved all the time as opening the trunk does not automatically lift it. It's a supremely annoying contraption!  Angry

I noticed that too in my friend's maxx. She finds it quite frustrating, especially when she's got two hands full or groceries or something. I understand the point of it, but I can't see it being very practical.

What I do like is the reclining rear seats idea.  Smiley
Logged
Zoo
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Chevy HHR, 1969 Chevelle, 2007 Yaris Hatchback
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 982


Always hungry..


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2006, 07:03:30 pm »

This should have the 250hp 3.6L V-6! Also, have a no charge option of a manual transmission! Cheesy
Logged
Bullet Blue
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 BMW 128i & 2008 Volvo C30
Gender: Male
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 6775



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2006, 07:54:53 pm »

I would take it with a manual tranny for sure, however, I don't really think that it has much of a market to include a manual transmission for the samew reason that Honda doesn't give us the Accord V6 sedan with a stick.  Cry
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Brkdmrcn v4 By [BrKDmRcN]
| Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 39 queries.