Howswedeitis
Learner's Permit
OfflineVehicle: Volvo V70 SE
Gender: 
Location: Canada
Posts: 147
member
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: October 06, 2005, 09:52:58 am » |
|
The fact remains that the S2000 has got no torque and anyone who knows anything about what makes a car fast will tell you that it's torque that is most important. Sure a s2000 at full song on a racetrack will be quick but in the real world where top gear acceleration, rolling acceleration will definately be lacking. Who cares about 0-60 times... I've smoked a s2000 in my Saab turbo on the highway when the hammers went down I was off like a shot (from 120kph to 210kph) and however hard this guy tried in his s2000 he just couldnt keep up. Honda knows this that's why the increased the displacement (longer stroke) of the recent model to improve the torque but it's still really lacking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: October 06, 2005, 09:55:52 am » |
|
Who cares about top gear acceleration?  Certainly not me, I certainly don't think the S2000 was "racing" in top gear, that wouldn't make much sense. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 06, 2005, 10:03:28 am by wing »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: October 06, 2005, 10:09:50 am » |
|
Oh and Honda didn't increase the displacement to improve top gear acceleration they did it to shut the fatties in the US up. An extra 10 lb/s of torque, the cars don't feel much different. Only the US and Canada get the 2.2L engine, the rest of the world still gets the 2.0L. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
a4_tom
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: October 06, 2005, 11:56:19 am » |
|
2.0 still performs better than 2.2 in auto-X track.
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
davidm
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: October 06, 2005, 01:07:58 pm » |
|
James, surprised at those 1/4 mile times for an S2000. Not bad. As Ovr nicely points out - all moot as we mess up the launch anyways. Saab turbo, nice car, but don't chase that S2000 through any corners (and please, dear god, do not try and out brake one - I don't want anyone to have to clean up that mess). Who cares about 120-210 kph acceleration? Talk about non-realworld scenario. Maybe 60-120 kph acceleration (as in a hwy onramp), but not a very interesting test. Besides, when you zip past someone on the street you have no idea if you are even racing - the other guy probably doesn't even care (I know I usually don't). Besides, as James said, this is about fun cars. High strung cars are just too much fun - kinda lets you feel 5% of what a bike is about. Going 200 in a straight line in the Saab, or my 328 for that matter, is boring. Try going 80 through some corners, much more compelling. Enough about this. Anyone wanna drag a 93 Miata - I think it might hit 16s (in a tail wind)  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'02 911 C2 Cab + '04 Volvo XC70 My sordid past - '07 Mini Cooper S, '01 Volvo V40, '97 BMW 328i, '04 A4 Avant 1.8TQ, '93 Miata LE, '91 Miata LE, '03 Protege5, '93 Pathfinder SE-V6, '97 Jetta K2
|
|
|
Howswedeitis
Learner's Permit
OfflineVehicle: Volvo V70 SE
Gender: 
Location: Canada
Posts: 147
member
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: October 06, 2005, 04:58:07 pm » |
|
The point I was trying to make is that torque is more important than horsepower which the S2000 lacks. As for passing acceleration I do have to disagree with the person that said that's not an important criteria when looking at a cars performance. To be sure, my "run" with a S2000 from 120 - 210 only goes to illustrate my point on torque. Yes maybe a better test would be 60kph to say 120kph (highway merging etc) which I'm sure my lowly Saab at the time (95 900 turbo) would still easily beat a S2000. Of course acceleration is only one criteria and handling and braking also are very very important in real world conditions. That said, I've driven various porsche 911's, a 944 porsche cup racer and went for a run as copilot in a 1970 911 all out race car (at Mont Tremblant) with a 3.8l slide valve injected motor putting out close to 500 hp and at least 350ft/lbs of torque and so when I say I'm not so impressed with the buzz bomb Honda calls the s2000 that's where I'm coming from. Sure it's a nice sports car but it has never done well at the track and any well tuned 80's vintage 911 (OK 84 n up 3.2l carrera) will make mincemeat of a S2000 on the track and off. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Howswedeitis
Learner's Permit
OfflineVehicle: Volvo V70 SE
Gender: 
Location: Canada
Posts: 147
member
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: October 06, 2005, 05:40:03 pm » |
|
Is a 1985 911 with a 3.2l motor a full blown race car? I dont think so! Now let's not get testy! It's hard to compare a car that spins at 18,000rpm and puts out some 800hp to a road car... If 4 cylinder engines are your thing and it interests you to see what can be done with them this might interest you... This Saab might just take a f1 car 0-60 or come close! Technical specification of Per Eklund's all-wheel drive Saab 9-3 Turbo Engine Longitudinally mounted, four-cylinder, 16-valve with twin overhead camshafts, Garrett turbocharger with 45 mm restrictor (to meet the competition rules), and intercooler. Displacement: 2.0 liters. Bore/stroke: 92/77 mm. Compression ratio: 9.0:1. Original Saab engine block and cylinder head. Engine tuned by Trollspeed of Trollhattan. Rating 550 - 600 hp at 6,500 rpm (750+ hp 2001-2003) Peak torque 592 Ib.-ft. at 4,000 rpm Transmission Four-wheel drive with programmable active differentials and six-speed Prodrive gearbox Weight 532 Ibs. (1999 regulations) 0 - 60 mph Under 2.5 seconds Top speed 124 -155 mph, depending on the drivetrain ratio |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: October 06, 2005, 06:01:39 pm » |
|
What does this have to do with a solstice or miata or S2000?
I want a convertable that I can pay $25k or less for I can drive to and from work, to the track, auto-x etc. And not spend a dime on maintenance (warranty or none).
People don't buy '85 porsche 911's with those critiria you are just argueing for the point of argueing.
I guess you only like Saabs, which is fine, but give up the Saab's are wholly than thou mantra.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: October 06, 2005, 06:04:06 pm » |
|
You seem to hate Hondas......  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sterling
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: October 06, 2005, 07:12:21 pm » |
|
Boy, where's a moderator when you need one to keep things on track. 
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: October 06, 2005, 07:13:50 pm » |
|
I don't think that's a moderator's job. Otherwise I'd be deleteing or moving everything posted  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ovr50
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: October 06, 2005, 08:12:11 pm » |
|
It's tough being the Moderator when you're both the Moderator and the Arguee!! Talk about 2 hats for James - you're doing a good job, James, hang in there.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport and 2005 Toyota Highlander in Indigo Ink
|
|
|
|
84im
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: October 06, 2005, 08:34:25 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 track/street Miata - I need a turbo!
|
|
|
|
AVToller
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: October 06, 2005, 09:24:15 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Retired, married, and loving it Ross
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: October 06, 2005, 11:04:05 pm » |
|
84im, how does that V8 affect handling? I'd throw in a super charger or turbo charger on a miata if it were me.
Although the roar of a V8 can be fun once and awhile for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ovr50
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2005, 11:07:36 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport and 2005 Toyota Highlander in Indigo Ink
|
|
|
|
ovr50
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: October 06, 2005, 11:09:45 pm » |
|
84im, how does that V8 affect handling? I'd throw in a super charger or turbo charger on a miata if it were me.
Although the roar of a V8 can be fun once and awhile for sure.
Ah, James, how about "all the time" - only unknowledgible youngsters don't appreciate the roar of a good V8 - one of the sweetest sounds in autodom. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2011 BMW X3 35i Vermillion Red, MSport and 2005 Toyota Highlander in Indigo Ink
|
|
|
|
mdxtasy
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: October 06, 2005, 11:16:13 pm » |
|
That V8 Miata would eat the Mustang and S2K for a snack. I cannot imagine what the rush would be like in such a machine. I've piloted a FM Turbo Miata running 11psi.....and I suspect that the V8 would be a tad quicker.
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
davidm
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: October 07, 2005, 12:40:09 pm » |
|
MDX, fun stuff isn't it. I drove a Greddy turboed Miata at 12.5 psi. First gear, what first gear? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'02 911 C2 Cab + '04 Volvo XC70 My sordid past - '07 Mini Cooper S, '01 Volvo V40, '97 BMW 328i, '04 A4 Avant 1.8TQ, '93 Miata LE, '91 Miata LE, '03 Protege5, '93 Pathfinder SE-V6, '97 Jetta K2
|
|
|
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
   
OfflineVehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: 
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 17630
If you ain't first ... you're last!
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: October 08, 2005, 08:37:45 pm » |
|
So I just went to gm's site to price out a solstice. It certainly doesn't come with much  Optioned out it's $31,915 you have to pay $700 for cruise and $1000 for A/C then $250 for limited slip. For $32k, no doubt you could buy an '03 S2000. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|