Author Topic: Kia cost cutting safety  (Read 2597 times)

Offline Shnak

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Hull
  • Posts: 7350
  • Carma: +1/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • New toy! :)
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2010 Hyundai Sonata Limited, 2006 Kia Sportage
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2005, 09:09:32 am »
Am I seeing triple?  :think:  SAM, you've got some company in logo-land.

my logo is bigger though... and bigger is always better, right?  :think:  ;D

Offline jeeper

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1395
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2005, 10:08:46 am »
i though the F150 was the best selling vehicle in Canada...am i wrong?  :o

Offline Brigitte

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Of What?
  • Posts: 8736
  • Carma: +55/-87
  • Gender: Female
  • Class Clown, Moderatrix and Resident Hag
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Santa Fe GLS 3.3L V6
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2005, 10:33:46 am »
Quote

And bigger is always better, right? :think: ;D

Quote

Depends on the specimen to which it's attached.  :)

a4_tom

  • Guest
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2005, 12:39:34 pm »
i though the F150 was the best selling vehicle in Canada...am i wrong? :o

Actually the best seller across North America.

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Board Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
  • Posts: 13372
  • Carma: +1/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2005, 01:28:41 pm »
...the world.
AQUAMAN64 also posts on BDFD.com!

Offline Shnak

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Location: Hull
  • Posts: 7350
  • Carma: +1/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • New toy! :)
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2010 Hyundai Sonata Limited, 2006 Kia Sportage
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2005, 03:03:05 pm »
Yeah but what about only in Canada? Does the F150 outsell the Civic here?

Offline Wetson

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario
  • Posts: 2537
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Moi
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2005, 03:15:36 pm »
Quote

And bigger is always better, right? :think: ;D

Quote

Depends on the specimen to which it's attached.  :)

Not neccessarily.

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Board Moderator
  • *****
  • Location: Oshawa/Havelock, ON
  • Posts: 13372
  • Carma: +1/-34
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2005, 03:17:34 pm »
It appears so.

August YTD:

F-Series: 49,113
Civic: 46,143
Caravan: 46,100 (2 years ago it was #1 I believe)
Mazda3: 38,322
...
Silverado: 26,002
Sierra: 27,212
Ram: 25,477
...
Tundra: 2,055
Titan: 1,075



Offline Drivesideways

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • *****
  • Location: 53.5N, 113.5W
  • Posts: 2371
  • Carma: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2005, 03:28:31 pm »
So, combined, the GM trucks are also ahead of the Civic....and the F-150.
"PC Load Letter...what the f_ck does that mean?"

Offline village

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 221
  • Carma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Kia cost cutting safety
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2005, 08:04:19 pm »
*shrug* While I agree, options like ABS/SAB etc. should be available.  I don't care for the automatic inclusion of them in every vehicle.  I'm too cheap and would rather save a few grand without them.  Now on the other hand, heated seats, power windows, doors and seats...  That's a requirement.

But then, I've never been (knock on wood) in a situation where either were required.  Of course, any future kids I have will be driving around in fisher price, foam coated, rubber bumpered, bounce proof cars as I can get them.